âCourts Reeking With Perjuries, Judge Charges,â Toronto Star. October 8, 1930. Page 19.
----
âSome Day Soonâ There Will Be âClean-Up,â Justice Kelly Warns
----
RAPS WITNESSES
---
Comment Roused at Bigamy Trial of Vittoria Farmer
----
Special to The Star
Simcoe, Oct. 8. - Warning that there was a âclean-upâ threatening to purge the courts of perjury, Mr. Justice Kelly commented on the conflicting evidence at the F. H. Davis bigamy trial here to-day.
Pleading belief that his first wife had died since their separation nine years ago, Frederick Hugh Davis, middle-aged Vittoria farmer, stoutly denied the crownâs allegations that he willfully committed a bigamous marriage at Mimico last August 27.
He is on trial before Mr. Justice Kelly at the supreme court assizes. Evidence was completed soon after court resumed to-day, A. H. Boddy of Brantford defended and G. W. Morley, K.C., of Collingwood, prosecuted for the crown.
Davisâ first marriage, according to evidence, was contracted at Ann Arbor, Michigan, in 1906. Until 1920, he and his wife lived happily together. The complaining Mrs. Davis alleges he deserted her and that for nine years past she has lived in Niagara Falls, Ont.
Accused countered that the wife of his youth had him arrested for non-support and did not return to live with him. A few months ago, his niece and nephew told him they had seen a newspaper notice of the death of Minnie Davis, wife of Frederick Davis. âI would never have married if I had not heard of that piece in the paper,â accused declared to-day.
Edward and Mrs. Jarvis both swore they saw the death notice and told accused. âYour wife is dead.â
âDavis believed the statements that his wife was dead, defence counsel argued.â They had been separated for years. He had seen her only once in that time and there was no communication between them. There was no reason why he should have chased down the newspaper notice. He was reasonably sure she was dead when he married again.
Referring to contradictory evidence heard during the trial, Justice Kelly declared:Â âSome day soon there is going to be a clean-up of perjury. The courts are reeking with it. In this case there has been a serious conflict of testimony about matters which we cannot reasonably believe the waitresses have forgotten.â