#section12

Effect of Marriage Consent Obtained by Fraud or Force | Section 12 Part 3 HMA 1955

Effect of Mental disorder & Insanity | Section 12 Part 2 HMA 1955 | Advocate Neeraj Gupta

Section 12 - Highgate to Stoke Newington

1. Erlinda Aguila 2. Enrico Albuerne 3. Clementina Aquino 4. Elizabeth Awitan 5. Raynita Barte 6. Estella Benavince 7. Enrique Bugarin 8. Ofelia Buenaventura 9. Digna Calderon 10. Renato Canlas 11. Ednabel Causing 12. Antonietta David 13. Carmen David 14. Lolita David 15. Zenaida de Lara 16. Eduardo Delfin 17. Adoracion del Rosario 18. Virginia Domingo 19. Ramon Duque 20. Tomas Espiridion 21. Jose Felices 22. Imelda Fermin 23. Caridad Fernandez 24. Benjamin Garcia 25. Jose Genuino 26. Honorario Gobencion 27. Benita Gonzaga 28. Felicidad Gonzalez 29. Nelia Gutierez 30. Elizabeth Halili 31. Benita Lim 32. Lourdes Liong 33. Amelia Malibiran 34. Teresita Malonzo 35. Reynaldo Ocampo 36. Jovito Ortiz 37. Rosalia Pangilinan 38. Myrna Penson 39. Edgar Quinones 40. Dalisay Regala 41. Jaime Santos 42. Rolando Santos 43. Josefina Sarmiento 44. Franco Silva 45. Melba Tesaiona 46. Resureccion Torres 47. Ofelia Valerio 48. Herminio Villanueva 49. Eulinia Vista 50. Armando Wong

This might have arguably been my favorite series of classes. Within these few lecture periods, we discussed the inclusion of feminist ideals into technology. I, for one, took the view of liberal feminism in support of the move towards equity. I honestly didn’t know what equity was before that class period and I can say that I was enlightened from my experience and participation in the discussion. I learned that equity is used to address the reasons for inequality. From the projects presented in class, I can also see that everyone in my class (section 12 rocks, btw...) that liberal feminism was the way to go. The project also encouraged leadership within technology which is important to have so that women may have the resources needed to get the same opportunities as others. 

I honestly didn’t expect to get so emotional during this film. This plenary was an amazing idea and I learned so much. I learned that in the 1960′s, people were put into shoes that they might not necessarily fit. What I mean by that is that shortly after birth, if one had ambiguous genitalia, the doctor would surgically alter it to conform to either male or female genitals and that individual would be made to conform to that sex. Although this was something I knew little about before watching this film, I believe that is very unfair; an individual has the right to choose who they want to be. A film like this is something that should be watched by more viewers because I can honestly say that I wasn’t aware that people were living this struggle before this movie. This can be a medium used to enlighten those who are ignorant of such things such as the invalidity of what was originally thought of sex. 

I enjoyed the last plenary that was created and produced by the Voorhees mentors. It was very creative and I could tell they put a lot of time into designing the format of our last plenary. I think my favorite part about the plenary is the fact that it was designed and run by students. The audience also did a lot of participating which was great. I feel the last plenary was the most conducive to what the goal of this class was because it allowed students to participate and share views on important topics like politics and macro and micro aggressions used in everyday life.