#religious phrasing

This perspective I can get behind.

If I use these phrases, it's usually in application against Christians in a "use their weapons against them" format, or when the participating audience at large is in agreement they're not to be taken seriously.

But I can see how it's just spreading those mores when the latter is the case.

There might be some person in the audience who misinterprets and uses your words as proof they're correct disregarding the greater context.

It's interesting to consider.

How can one change a phrase to remove the religious reference?

Does one need to respond to it at all if it actually displeases us?

What about if we desire to encourage expansion of an idea or a reposting whilst also appearing above it all, which is clearly not the case because of the interaction and reposting?

In what ways do we need to consider the audience of the person we are reblogging from, versus the greater future audience we aim to spread to?

If they really wanted to police you, and promote these mores in the first place, they'd report you/block you instead of spreading what was posted, so actions run counter to the phrase telling the wider audience something is juicy and possibly spicy.

What says that, all of that, most accurately, without incorporating religious imagery into the mix?

"You've gone overboard"? "Walk the plank"?