âMy Two Dadsâ was Simply Ahead of its Time: A Short Essay by an Offspring of Same-Sex Parents
In 1987, the show âMy Two Dadsâ premiered on NBC, staring Paul Reiser, Greg Evigan, Staci Keanan, and Florence Stanley. Nicole Bradford (Keanan) is a 12-year-old girl whose mother Marcy Bradford dies suddenly, and she is âwilledâ more or less to two men her mother was once in love with, Michael Taylor (Reiser) and Joey Harris (Evigan), who were lifelong friends before they fought over Nicoleâs mother. Despite attempts at blood tests, the paternity of the child was never confirmed, and after a rocky start, Michael and Joey agree to live together and raise Nicole as a family.
What we have here is a simple, relatively family friendly, prime-time sitcom that shows a very positive interpretation of a kid with same-sex parents. And it is delightful.
I am speaking openly as a queer person raised by two mothers (now four w/step-moms). When I decided to try this, I was bracing myself for the absolute worst most offensive thing Iâd ever seen.
And I swear to God, what I got instead is one of my new favorite shows of all time. The characters are lovable and well-rounded, the acting is great, the humor is actually funny, and, whether this was intentional or not, is one of the most progressive shows of its time.
I keep seeing people throwing around the word âhomophobicâ with this show, and Iâm here to politely and firmly disagree with that. Instead, I will opt for the word âdated.â âMy Two Dadsâ was still a product of its time, so I firmly believe many of the choices regarding Joey and Michaelâs dating life were made to appease the censors. I never felt like any decision was made in malice to target the queer community. (Not to mention, I could/will make a whole LIST of reasons why Michael and Joey are 100% in love, if not an active couple, despite many attempts to convince the audience they are straight.)
I spent a good chunk of the show laughing to myself and saying âitâs like homosexuality doesnât even exist in this universeâ for how much NOBODY cares about Nicole having two dads or questioning why the dads live together. (Them being potentially gay is only questioned ONCE in the series.)
In the 90s and early 2000s, people never shut up with the questions once I told them I had two moms. I somewhat think this exclusion was also a writing tactic, not wanting Nicole to have to constantly repeat what the audience already knows.
There are jokes that havenât aged amazingly well, but I feel like it was much more that the writers were ignorant as opposed to being active bigots.
I also really appreciated this showâs depiction of a kid who has a great and loving relationship with a parent she may not be or isnât biologically related to. Nicole doesnât care who her biological father is, and loves Joey and Michael equally. Again, as someone with two moms, I get really defensive over the notion that someone isnât your real parent unless their DNA matches yours. (Side note, always say âbiologically related toâ as opposed to âREAL parentâ whenever asking someone about their parentage. Please. It hurts every time.)
If I admittedly had one qualm about the show, Iâd say it hasnât aged amazing in terms of sexism. Throughout the whole show, it always felt like the women Michael and Joey dated were either complete jerks or bimbos. With the women they finally end up with being boring and rushed. And they also at one point have a female boss, andâŚitâs pretty bad. Nicole and Judge Margaret were great (Judge being my 2nd favorite character, behind Michael.), but other female characters not so much.
But overall, I really do love this show. Itâs one of those really nice warm & fuzzy shows, too (Think âFull Houseâ with slightly funnier writing. Yeah, I said it!). I really wish more queer viewers would try it.










