Thought only half cooked but when queerness is associated only and exclusively with femininity, it seems to onlookers like trans men already have it "all". Like its as if we don't have to struggle to acquire queer identity (if it's associated with femininity) because people take one look at our (presumed) agab and think, surely it is a leg-up to be afab. Even though it's the thing often causing us the most distress.
When there's lateral aggression by other queer people being transandrophobic, could some of our concerns that we don't feel welcome due to our acquired masculinity be meeting the belief of others that we have nothing to complain about, because *surely* trans men already had a leg-up in the queerness department?
So when queerness is exclusively seen as feminine, this is a problem it creates. It means that transmasculinity is dismissed because surely we already had an "in" based on presumed agab and *surely* don't need any help or support. When in reality we are often expelled from queerness when our masculinity is seen as incongruous to it.
I only just woke up so brain is soup. But this explains why some transandrophobic trans women have said things along the lines of "trans men are privileged over trans women" because our presumed agabs are seen as an unfair advantage when it comes to access to the queer community. If queerness = femininity, then the logic is those afab have an edge over those who weren't. But this is predicated on a misunderstanding of queerness in the first place. When queer masculinity isn't allowed to exist, neither is transmasculinity. The whole conception/stereotype of queerness is flawed and leads to this.
The only remedy is to insist on queerness including all expressions. Not just a narrow set.