PuSh 2014 Recap
I was really hoping to catch the closing weekend PuSh Assembly roundtable led by Forest Fringe, a UK artist-led organization co-directed by Andy Field and Deborah Pearson. Together, they support the work of a diverse community of writers, theatre makers, musicians, dancers and live artists that started out as an alternative, artist-driven platform amidst the Edinburgh Fringe Festival. As a past attendee of the Edinburgh Fringe, one of the largest of its kind in Europe, and a former resident of Edmonton, the host of the largest Fringe in North America, I was curious to know how they developed and processed anything amidst the total saturation of the "fringe" festival model.
From its event blurb, "Forest Fringe has used its adventurous and award-winning programs to explore what a festival is and what it could be. What is the relationship to art-making and curation? How has the growth and development of artist-driven networks over the past decade changed performing arts infrastructures for dissemination? What if we committed to developing, rather than performing, work?" I unfortunately could not make it to the panel, but in using these questions to reflect on PuSh 2014, how does the festival stack up in terms of what a live arts festival could be?
This is only the third PuSh Fest I've covered, and looking back at some earlier ruminations, I am reminded by how surprising and unique I found this festival to be in 2012. Then, I could only grapple with comparing PuSh to other live arts festivals (and not Fringes) in Montreal and in Europe where there are networks of practicing interdisciplinary artists. Three years on, I am still slightly thrilled to live in a city that can pull off an international festival of this artistic caliber and fill the seats with a diverse local audience.
Because as an addendum from my first recap, the context for a festival like PuSh, if only spatially, is so vastly different from its European counterparts in terms of maintaining artist networks and curatorial reach. If I have learned anything about Vancouver in the past three years, is that it is a very isolating place, geographically and otherwise, in terms of staying within the flow of an international exchange of networks, resources, and ideas. Eventually things make it over here, and PuSh appears to be establishing itself as the premiere festival to partner with for presenting a touring show like Night or Nanook of the North/Tanya Tagaq.
After three festivals, I can only surmise that the artistic direction of the festival is firmly rooted in an appreciation of traditional theatre, but with a healthy appetite for experimentation of form. The slightly edgier content work falls into the late evening Club events and the critical reflections into daytime Assembly events. While certainly I don't feel like I have seen anything at the cutting edge of contemporary performing arts, I am really impressed by the number of great performing arts spaces available in this city, including the two latest spaces, The York and the Fox, as well as finally getting a glimpse into The Chan Centre at UBC, which is just an insane space for not being somewhere more central.
Each festival is still only as good as its last, and by these measurements, PuSh is still pretty good, and also pretty safe.












