thinking that. compersonally (<- systemwidely & personally) we prefer to describe our plurality as polyrhythmic rather than use any consciousness labels. understand that to many, may look same - polyrhythmic vs (poly)conscious label - but not so to us. feel that for us consciousness labels in general too close associate with metric of "validity" as system and not relate to any definition of any consciousness label really and felt/feel that plural community sometimes use monoconsciousness or non-("sufficiently"-)polyconsciousness as way to recategorize certain pmsc& folkel into singlethood or "close enough" again. aucosm not go there. will not go there. will not be put into singlethood again ever ever. hate force of normativity about it. do not feel fair to us at all.
talk sometimes on this blog about how if us not plural, us dead. to us, much like "death over detransition" feelings that many of but not all us have. which mean very significant when thanatophobic. death over singlethood for us. but also more literally if had not pluralized, very truly would have died in many of us opinion.
polyrhythmic capture perfect energy to us about distinctly nonsinglet but ALSO (important) NOT collection of singlets in room sitting together. in some way, many us not "whole people" like singlet. well, disagree with idea of pluran = not whole people of course and generally metric of whole(person)ness/hood but is culturally relevant concept and so often relevant us especially when internalized pluralmisia. tie into being kaleitien and fracturebased and astraplex bc concept of whole personhood also simultaneously unrelevant a la inapplicable via rejection of idea. yes, fractured some way, which reveals distinctness of existence and dissociation all the way down in cracks everywhere. but not less than singlet or less than plural system (on two difference measures of worth for first and valid of second).
do additionally identify as mediple[flux] but polyrhythmic capture altogether different aspect of it if make sense. other thing is different understanding said above in previous paragraph also why use ceter instead sysmate. bc ceter mean nontraditional sysmate technically who not "fully" or meet certain qualities compared to others in system. but for us, noone traditional sysmate who "full"(er) of others. everytwo (<- feel better internally than everyone bc connection to two in partner way *and* us way. should also talk about how twoy = us sometimes as well. maybe after this? w(i/e)ll see) equal. [also not say that other pmsc& folkel who use ceter + sysmate/headmate/alter/etc think ceters less or anything!! how people label self(&ves) like ceter/sysmate = self(&ves) business. for us particulars of internalized pluralmisia and ocdness mean this us use.]
truly feel like orchestra in some way where could be music on individual instrument but also maybe missing something when compare to full collective. cacophony of sounds and melodies and rhythms and. polyrhythmic! [absolutely not say singlet = individual instrument missing out. singlethood important for many. good thing exist. point is different understanding altogether!!]
capture existence of being inside system soulscape too. mix and mixture of sounds and colors and times and spaces and thoughts and things other too so many. like polyrhythmic song always. related to amismbased-ness too think. but usually not overwhelm ing even when for sensitive ceters including becaus own internal [tho soulscape not viewed fully internally or externally to us] mind/soulscape experience. and when is, overwhelm mean, combine to make beautiful music. do not need monorhythmicness to be wonderful; polyrhythmic wonderful.
