#phroyd

phroyd: For.

starweird03: One thing in the line and run the gamut from the house!

phroyd: Her need medical attention.

starweird03: If any one factor but of course bukky.

Just deal With It!

VOTE!

rorylol replied to your post: Good Advice! And, The Ignorant … Pleas...

I’m pretty sure you’re better than this. This is pretty immature.

"Maturity" has nothing to do with it.  It's a Metaphor! However, the notion that The Ignorant and Under-Informed should stay home, is a heartfelt suggestion.

socialistexan reblogged your post rabbitglitter: sayahomu: kittenberry... and added:

Never thought a game of “spot the cissexist” would be from a direct reblog from.Holy wow, man, where the...

My comments had nothing to do with the overall health issue within Reproductive Health Care, it was directed only at the issue of "Gender Definition".  Even the term "Cissexist" is meaningless; the entire "Cis" Gender designation is born of the very incompetent Mental Health Professionals you mention; the ones who are "Politically Correct", and see it from that perspective, NOT the qualified, experienced clinicians who look deeper into the sexual identity issue (than the average population). Those are  the qualified clinicians.  And their voice has been drown out by all of the PC-Wishy-Washy-Touchy-Feely, Warm and Fuzzy "Therapists".

Unfortunately, it is this group of individuals who have created a Political-Identity Issue out of Transexual social acceptance.  There ARE only 3 Biological Human "Genders": Male, Female and Neutral (meaning that at birth, there isn't a clear genital distinction).  Modern Medical and Surgical techniques have brought a new issue into the mix through Sexusl Reassignment.  We've still yet to perfect genetics to correlate any chromosomal identity to the transgender population, at least not enough to mke any helpful conclusions. But Gender Identity has been around since forever!  There is nothing psychologically pathalogical about identifying with another Gender, nor is there anything pathalogical about objecting to Socially-Specifed Gender "Roles" in our society.  These have all been around for ages.  But the issue of demanding a change in our Language which effects the established biological genders, solely to sooth the fragile egos of those who have chosen to live as an opposite gender or to even have the sexual reassignment conpleted, is nothing more than Primary Narcissism, an Identity issue all it's own, probably oresent in many of these men and women prior to the reassignment.  

Look at the statistics if you want to see how many Trans-Gender people, after years of living as another gender, finally find their identites and return to their biologcal gender identification. (Except, of course, for all of those who have ad the reassignment surgery)  It mirriors the process of Sexual Identity and Lifestyle Choice, similar to Gay and Straight men and women.

Because the poorly trained "Therapists" have risen to the "Rights" Podium on this subject, the kind of exploration needed for a better understanding of Transexualism; especially why some choose the reassignment surgery, has been snubbed, much to the Disservice of the Transgender Community!

So "Cis""Binary", etc... Gender Designations are Nothing More than a fabricated nomenclature in service of  displaced identity issues.  And given the much more important issues that this new generation is facing, it's excessively, possibly obsessively  ego-centric, at BEST!  If anything, they need psycholgical help in Accepting Themselves, before they go marching forward demanding that language be chaged to "accept" them!

iambecomenothing reblogged your post Response To A Post Comment, Hopefully ... and added:

Gender differences aren’t “biological”, with the exception of external features associated with...

OK, let's look at it from a different perspective, Socio-Political.  It would make sense that Gender, in this country, would be the logical next issue in both questioning and objecting to the social status quo.  There has never been another time in history of recorded social movements which parallels the incredible gains in Civil Rights made by so many differnt groups.  To simplify, for discussion's sake, we had a wave of Rights movements gaining momentum and becoming a wave which caught many different groups riding it's crest.  First, we had Civil Rights for Black Americans, then other identified "minorities, from that there was a exlposion of demand for civil rights for wmen, then the homosexual community; riding that crest was the beginning of what eventualy degenerated into Political Correctness, those who demanded recognition and respect who have been identified previously with archaic terms that had taken on derogutory referrence (retard, a valid clinical diagnosis in the 30's and 40's degenerated into an insult, being one example); and now Gender.

From a Socio-Political perspective, questioning Gender in not an unreasonable next issue for scrutiny.  Throughout history, the two "recognised" genders (recognised by status quo societies) were Men and Women (male and female) and there were social-role exectations accompanied by dominance and submission in their social order.  Men held the power and the oney (property, capital, etc); women were the servant class (sex, childbearing, chattle, labor).  These role associations held steady through th transition from the Gentry Class structure to the Labor Class Structure.  It wasn't until the 1960's that there was a questioning of everything about the social status quo which began the momentum for questioning the role-approriated status of minorities and women, and eventually the gay community.

Yet, I find it difficult to separate "Gender" itself, from Gender-imposed social roles.  And underlying all of this is still the basic fundimentals of Biology which DO have a primary impact upon what draws people to specific roles.

So how does a recognition of multi-gender definitions play into this?