me, whispering softly to a room full of philosophers: relativism
philosphers scatter, panic ensues, I triumph

seen from Italy

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Brazil

seen from France
seen from Canada
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Pakistan
seen from China

seen from Malaysia

seen from Canada
seen from United States
seen from Singapore

seen from United States
seen from China
me, whispering softly to a room full of philosophers: relativism
philosphers scatter, panic ensues, I triumph

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Nowadays I'm thinking of Idealists as the ruthless, bad guys who don't care enough about people. And that Loyalists at least care for people as they are, and how caring for people could ever be wrong? Would you please help me, and talk of how each primary can be really bad and really good? Or if you have already, if you could please redirect me to that post.
I talk about this a lot. I think it's the unifying theme of my blog.
And I do watch the discussion go through trends. At the beginning there was a lot of anti-Snake stuff which I thankfully haven't seen for a while. Then it was all anti-Badger, and I got private messages from Badger primaries all concerned that Badger was being turned into the "bad guy" sorting. And so I made a point to write a lot about Universal Badgers, and how Badger primaries can be healthy and heroic.
And so maybe I've over corrected. But I'm an Idealist, I adore Idealists, both characters and real people. I think that's more than reflected in what I write, and the heroic characters I and other people have sorted. In my summary of the system, I write a lot about how each primary can be unhealthy or immature. And that's mostly because, at my core, do not like the words good and bad. I think they are flattening and overly simplistic and thought-killing. And I truly believe I could not write this blog if at any point I EVER considered ANY of the people I write about to be 'good' or 'bad.'
So right now, Iām hoping that this just isn't something baked in. That there's always got to be a baddie, and so I run round and round trying my best to take the heat off each one in a sequence. I know it's hard trying to understand morality systems and ways of being that are not your own, but that is the entire point of this entire system.
in life, there is no good and bad
there is no right and wrong
there is no heroes and villains
there is no good people and bad people
there is just people and facts
there is just storytellers and listeners
there is just pov's and interpretations
What is the difference between the way a Snake loves and a non-Snake primary loves??
Basically, the way Snakes tie morality into love. Everyone can love just as intensely, but it's only Snakes who think that loving and protecting Their People is the highest moral good there is. (More than the good of the group, more than the Truth, more than the Cause, more than the Art.)
Sartre has the example of the student who had to choose between joining the French Resistance, and staying to protect his mother.Ā And his conclusion is that neither option was objectively morally correct, and his student would have to decide for himself.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
exploded bird primary (lion system ā burnt badger system) + lion secondary (bird model)
Hello, you have a really interesting blog! Itās fascinating to read the process of you sorting someone. I was wondering if you could help me find my sorting.
I donāt know my primary OR my secondary. They might be burnt, but I think this is mostly a result of me overthinking and being shite with self-analysis. Which is a horrible combination.
Iāve found my best work is usually the result of me taking what someone else has done, ripping it apart, adding or removing parts as needed (usually all of them) and then making a cohesive Thing out of it. Itās how Iāve made projects, stories, art, etc.
What an interesting thing to say. Wanting something to start with something which you can then respond to is making me think Improvisational secondary. Snake or Lion?
The process of picking apart someoneās work/advice gives me an idea of what I want to make. Which is why I usually end up doing my work at the last minute, by begging everyone else for their work.
Oooh weāre leveraging the community. So a social secondary like Snake is still very possible, especially with that description of pulling something together last minute using pieces. Very improvisational. But Iām wondering if thereās going to be any Badger in your sorting. Maybe as a primary.
Itās also how I treat advice and suggestion (which annoys my sister a lot, heh). I listen to someoneās suggestions on how to act or react to some problem, and then decide what I want to do. Itās like I need a base to completely disregard. A signpost which tells me, āGoing left looks like a decent ideaā so that I can decide for myself to go whether to go right or centre. The metaphor is somewhat nonsensical but itās the best Iāve right now.
So I could read this as just being contrary (rebelling to rebel), or maybe being in a situation where you need to utilize negative indicators. It could be a way to bootstrap a Lion primary - get some outside advice, then see if you emotionally respond positively or negatively. But the fact that you depend so much on your community when deciding what to do makes me think an external primary - Badger or Bird.
Making a plan makes me feel secure, because āFinally! A direction to move in.ā However, Iāve never been able to follow any of the plans I have. I usually end up just doing stuff at the last minute when I canāt worry about other things. You know, when my head is too full with an overwhelming sense of āI have to do this right now!ā to get distracted. The planās just to get me started.
Oh this is executive dysfunction stuff. And not to armchair diagnose, which is super not ethical⦠but a LOT of neurodivergent people write into me, and a LOT of them have helpful bird secondary models that function as toys/coping techniques.
My go-to method for solving people-problems is to think of the things I want to get across, psyche myself up for the confrontation and just barge on with it. Just, do it. Yeet myself into the tense and undesirable situation and weāll see what happens. Itās the only good method. The other two are āpretend this problem doesnāt existā and āignore that person/those people foreverā.
Super DUPER Lion secondary. There are two choices 1) Charge at the problem, see what happens 2) Do nothing.
Itās easy for me to fake my investment in things. I got into the Environment Club recently, and in the application form I remember writing about oil spills in a way that made it seem as though it was an issue Iāve been passionate about for a long time. It had only come to my attention when āOcean on Fire in Mexican Watersā became a headline. I was very proud of that one. While I wonāt fake an opinion, I can and will control how passionate I appear about a thing. I am rather proud of this.
Still Lion. That is how Lions face-change - they can raise or lower their intensity.
Secondaries are easy to understand for me. The idea that there is a way of doing things that comes naturally to me is fairly plausible. Primaries on the other handā¦.they are murky as fuck for me. I always end up getting in tangles over it.
On one hand, itās natural for a person to prioritise their loved ones and the issues that affect their people over other issues. On the other hand, this is the sort of mindset that stops us from caring about issues beyond our tiny sphere. The sort of things that makes us indifferent towards the suffering of those who are not a part of your group or one of your people. What is the correct mode of action here?
Stop fuckin flirting with me I am trying to talk about the Infinity with you you absolute moron
lion primary (bird model) + slightly burnt lion secondary
Hi there! Iām a fan of your sorting posts, and of your kind and insightful way of supporting people in finding out more about themselves. So naturally Iād be very interested in your take about my own sorting, if youāre game! :)
I wonāt talk much about my Secondary, because now that Iām starting to unburn my Lion seems very clear to me, even when my explosion-prone Badger model still tries to get in the way of that clarity sometimes. The more interesting riddle is my Primary. So far Iām operating under the working theory that I am a Lion with a very strong Bird model - or is it the other way āround?
The supposed dichotomy between āthinkingā and āfeelingā in many of the more binary personality models has always bugged me, so itās no wonder this is the area where whenever I feel like Iāve decided on who I am (for now) a new question mark pops up (so much fun!).
If āthinkingā and āfeelingā doesnāt work for you as terminology, it might help to think of Lion as leading with subconscious reasoning, and Bird as leading with conscious reasoning.
Instead of trying to formulate a cohesive text, which would have gotten even longer, Iām putting together an associative list of thoughts and stories that kept turning up while I was trying to figure out my Primary.
A very Lion primary way to solve a problem, not gonna lie ;)
- I think I got my Bird model from my father, who made quite an effort to teach me to look at things from all angles. As a child, whenever I got in a fight with this friend I had, he would sit me down and ask me to put myself in my friendās shoes. It was hard, because a lot of the time my friend was being unfair to me and I actually could have used some support, someone to tell me that it was not okay to treat me this way. But Iām still immeasurably grateful for my fatherās lessons, through which Iāve learned to understand peoplesā motivations and gained an understanding for the complexities of every conflict. He also taught me to doubt, to look closer, to not just believe the first thing I see, or want to see. To this day I still consider my ability to pin down the relevant factors of a situation before I make judgments one of my strengths.
That definitely sounds like a very strong, beloved Bird model.
- Whenever I had to write an essay at school or uni, I first had to come up with some aspect about the subject that I really cared about, even could be passionate about. (I am passionate about many things, so it was usually possible to find some connection to that.) Then I would use the essay to discuss this aspect in great detail, ending with a polemic flourish. I had the time of my life doing that; meanwhile the text would structure itself magically in relation to the issue I had chosen to focus on. Whenever I tried to write without such a focus, Iād get bored, stressed and the text would be of a much lower quality.
- Something similar happened in oral exams at uni: Only when I got the opportunity to bring a discussion paper (a few pointed statements regarding the exam topic) which I could then debate, I was able to recollect all the important details I needed for that. If I just had to report on the topic or answer questions, I often got confused, to the point of drawing a complete blank.
Linking things to emotion and passion - thinking with emotion and passion, basically - is a Lion primary thing. Especially if doing that makes you feel safe & comfortable & effective & happy.
- Even as a teenager I was very interested in philosophy, ethics and moral decision making.
I love teaching philosophy to teenagers. Itās the perfect time for it, they are so into it, and if it were up to me I would absolutely make it a required class.
I picked up certain philosophical ideas and concepts that I liked and integrated them in my belief system (yes, I know how very Bird that sounds).
I had my mind blown by Genealogy of Morals in high school, and I still wonāt shut about Eichmann in Jerusalem. But what was so staggering to me in high school was⦠here are these ways of thinking that are possible and allowed. The fact that here they are in words in front of me made me a great deal more expansive.