Hey about your post on trans men;
You're making a very heavy accusation; that a lot of trans men are indirectly playing into transphobes' hands and being transmisogynist
because acknowledging their oppression as people who are transgender and afab (for those who were afab and not intersex) means that by the same logic trans women are "less" oppressed because amab = not oppressed....
But that's absolutely not true. That's the whole point of intersectionality; there are no categories that you can add up until you get a positive or negative result because everyone's unique situation leads to different types of oppressions and power dynamics are not set in stone; the oppressed can be oppressors and vice versa. Being transgender, and being afab, are simply two of the many parameters that can help describe the different oppressions they face
At the intersection of being afab, and being trans, and identifying as a man specifically, they threaten the patriarchy's concept of masculinity, and the patriarchy's control on the bodies and behavior of those who are assigned "women". and leads which leads to specific types of abuse that target trans men like corrective SA with threats of impregnation with the aim to remind trans men of their "true place".
I love the implication that AFAB and intersex are mutually exclusive categories, subtly reinforcing bioessentialism by suggesting that AGAB == "biological sex"
Great job alluding to the TWERF concept of "sex-based oppression" without ever saying it outright! A key tactic for propagating TWERF ideology in trans spaces is to never outright use TWERF language, instead couching it in terms that are more agreeable for unsuspecting trans people, so good job! Bonus points if that wasn't your intention, that just shows how effectively that rhetoric is spreading!
Unfortunately I will have to dock some points because the strategy of saying "intersectionality" followed by a complete misunderstanding of how it actually works is kind of old hat by this point; intersectionality is not about "everyone's unique situation", it's about how multiple overlapping oppressions reinforce each other and it was coined by Black women to demonstrate how Black liberation and women's liberation were both incomplete without a focus on their struggles because they were often left behind by both white women and Black men
And sadly the conclusion of your ask leaves a lot to be desired, not only do you imply that manhood is a meaningful axis of oppression (lol), your final point implies that sexual assault is an AFAB-only experience that's only meaningful with the risk of impregnation, completely erasing the very real sexual assault that trans women experience constantly
Overall, this ask makes the common mistake of assuming that the statement "trans men aren't oppressed for being men" to mean that they aren't oppressed for being trans, when that's blatantly untrue; the primary difference is that trans men, generally speaking, are seen by the patriarchy as gendered property that needs to be fixed (through horrific abuse), while trans women aren't even good enough to be property, we're a thing to be discarded entirely, not corrected; both experience transphobic abuse, but trans women experience the additional axis of transmisogynistic abuse, for daring to see womanhood as more desirable than manhood
