#pedojacketing

-it depicts transgender viktor with a tdick

-her reblog has her claiming that its 1. a micropenis. 2. clearly a pedophilic piece of art

-she is corrected 50+ times that it is a t-dick and not pedophilic

-she triples down on all porn depicting anyone with micropenises is pedophilic. she calls everyone correcting her racist (she is black) or a pedophile. she continues to harass people correcting her and calling them pedophiles (and still is!).

so apparently having sex as someone with a micropenis or as someone with a micropenis is ‘pedophilic’ yeah. not. intersexist at all pal …. (bonus: she then claims having sex with people who have dwarfism is also pedophilic because they ‘look like kids’ what the fuck is she on)

this is intersexism, transandrophobia and ableism for the end bit.

It has gotten to the point that I scroll past any "pedo" accusations I see online because more often than not, they don't actually mean "an adult who sexually victimizes children." It's far more likely that they mean "This person is 22 dating an 18 year old" or "This person drew cartoons I don't like" or "This person wrote a story that portrays CSA without glorifying it, but I'm media-illiterate and think any portrayal is glorification and that's the author's fault" or, also entirely too common, "This person consensually practices kink with other adults and I don't like it."

the transmisogynists are once again trying to pedojacket a trans woman who speaks about her experiences with transmisogyny! like what the fuck is anon even talking about here??? this Pinocchio part is referencing this post where i detail my traumatic experience with a scene from Shrek 2 as a child as part of a larger discussion about the prevalence of transmisogyny in all forms of media.

‘she was saying that pedophiles are people too and their paraphilia doesn’t necessarily make them a bad person nor a child predator!’

I understand that the subject matter may seem inseparable sometimes, that's why it's so extremely important not to make light of such serious language like anything Big Three related when someone is referring an archetype of fictional character.

It creates burnout in the person reading that eventually becomes an outright dismissal of any and all abuse accusations with "Ugh, they're just complaining about Onimai or Madoka or whatever."

It won't matter if there are real victims vouching for your post, or even if it was posted by one-such survivor, after the reader finds that the likelihood that they'll stop reading and stop caring gets a little higher. Apathy then grows overall.

THIS is why equating fiction with reality is damaging to victims, especially when done so often and so brazenly: because victims are NOT fictional characters.

Victims are not narrative constructs created in someone else's imagination for the sole purpose of providing entertainment.

Victims are not forever-convienent talking points with which internet strangers can gossip about each other.

Victims are not fandom discourse or drama.

Please stop treating them as such, you're causing more harm than good.

I think this is the most mask off, transphobic thing I have ever seen by people that call themselves allies. Like holy shit they’re just reaching right wing talking points now what the actual fuck