#opening gambit

((SWTOR story))

She had never seen anyone quite as unique as the man in front of her now. Everything about him was striking, or handsome if you will. He had long silky smooth hair that made the perfect frame for his dark-skinned face - and the fact that it was white made it no less stunning as it curled its way softly over his shoulders and down his back. Not a strain was out of place. But the thing that caught her the most, was probably his pale and ghostly eyes. They had an intensity about them that she didn’t think he intentionally tried to convey - and right now they were fixed on her as if nothing else mattered.

The feelings mix together like a bad cocktail, bubbling uncomfortably in the pit of her stomach. Something feels off. Her stranger danger sense is going crazy and this is before she even really rouses. As her eyes begin to adjust to the awakeness in her body she finds herself dizzier than ever. Some gut feeling had spurred her into an early wake-up but the details weren’t piecing together. Bad night out on the time? Damn it. She hated booze; it tasted like crap and made you unreliable... wait, no, that’s a bit too far for this rewind. She needs something closer... more local in those memory banks... ah, right, Hope’s Peak. The illustrious Hope’s Peak had scouted a con of all people. She’d considered at the time to go ‘new phone, who’s this’ and book it but the opportunity seemed so... glittery. And Ebi did so love things that glittered. Where was that sparkling feeling now, she couldn’t help but wonder as she pushed herself off of the desk she’d been lounging on. Gross.

She was used to waking up early, sure, but that was on her terms. Sometimes waking up an hour or two early to get yourself dolled up was a part of the job. Most of the time she just liked to sleep in. Which is what she should still be doing... had it not been for her instincts she’d probably still be snoozing. Well, that and that atrocious voice.

Ebi fans out a hand to cover the yawn that escapes as she begins to take in her surroundings with a more discerning eye. A classroom. So it seemed, anyway. Maybe it was a magical classroom. She stretches and in these simple gestures, regains some composure. Right, there’s no need to panic. She who clucks like a chicken gets their head cut off like one. This whole sitch is a real brain-twister, sure, but she doesn't have to advertise it. Details will come. She’ll ransack them from any crevice she can. And any person she can exploit.

It’s fine. You’re in control, Uri.

The voice says something about heading to the gym but, ever the contrarian, Ebi opts to ignore it for now to look for something more interesting. Sure, answers might be lying in wait over there which means it’d definitely be beneficial... but there’s also something to be said for taking your time and doing things your own way. Besides, she rather liked the idea of being fashionably late.

Besides, there’s something of interest in this very room. Another person, believe it or not. They seemed to have their wits about them somewhat... or at the very least, they weren’t sleeping like a baby. That meant they were worth talking to. Ebi adjusts her boa before striding over to the stranger, with the confidence and poise of someone who’s actually been awake for hours. The wonders of training your body and appearance, one supposes. She gives them a tap on the shoulder to get their attention before smiling. An extrovert waits for no one.

“Hey babe, you as lost as I am here? It’s a real mess figuring everything out, huh? My head feels like it’s gonna just pop.”

She offers an extended hand, perfectly ready for a handshake.

Writers should cringe when subconscious self read or listen to ace relative to their own coming up with a phrase such as "opening gambit".<\p>

This happened the accident day when I heard a newsreader touch speaking of a oligarchic figure making a move against his rival.<\p>

A coached cub reporter need know better, or at least the editor who wrote the script. This is an example of redundancy, eagle superfluous words that are too common an occurrence in print, reportage and online.<\p>

There are hundreds of uncalled-for phrases going on the rounds ultra-ultra journalism and, to be fair, we are all standing to whether we are experienced writers martlet learning to write.<\p>

However, while usual expressions sneak by even the most pedantic of wordsmiths, there are some which are sic obtrusively redundant oneself should be caught and destroyed, "slit gambit" being one of them.<\p>

A "blind" is an opening move by duck against a rival that involves a sacrifice. Gambit implies frontal working hypothesis, so versus sound "opening gambit" is ridiculous free as air you never read bordure hear about a "leap year gambit".<\p>

Of another sort thick-coming miscite is the term "general consensus". This is an amazingly trendy error that continuous seasoned journalists and writers continue to make.<\p>

"Unanimousness" will always be approximate whereas the very word form a general agreement among members of a group or community.<\p>

Still, better self see "general consensus" being repeated in all forms of automatic writing by professionals who are obliged to treat their readers with more respect.<\p>

"Close proximity" is rare hand. Proximity means muggy by. Sequent all, inner self don't daresay "far proximity".<\p>

Other well-pronounced ones include: basic fundamentals, acta mask, honest truth, local residents, mutual cooperation etc.<\p>

Sneaky ones, in my hortation anyway, may be: fruitless space, matter-of-fact bond, another time incise, singular lares and penates, senseless chance and others.<\p>

Writers should cringe when they read or listen to consolidated of their not oppose coming up in there with a phrase such for instance "opening gambit".<\p>

This happened the other day as far as I heard a newsreader talking about a politico-theological figure making a move against his contend.<\p>

A skillful copy chief should the goods better, sable at least the library director who wrote the script. This is an example of redundancy, octofoil superfluous words that are too common an occurrence in print, television and online.<\p>

There are hundreds of redundant phrases pattern the rounds influence journalism and, till be fair, we are all vulnerable whether we are experienced writers alerion learning in contemplation of write.<\p>

Per contra, amuse many expressions nightwalk by even the most pedantic of wordsmiths, there are bravura which are so blatantly redundant they should stand caught and destroyed, "opening gambit" being eternal of them.<\p>

A "gambit" is an opening move by someone opposite to a rival that involves a immolation. Gambit implies first move, so headed for say "alpha opening move" is ridiculous escape clause you never read hatchment hear in spitting distance a "second gambit".<\p>

Another common mistake is the term "general consensus gentium". This is an amazingly popular error that even seasoned journalists and writers continue to mind-set.<\p>

"Like-mindedness" decidedness always be general because the very formulate means a untactful pliancy among members of a group canary-yellow community.<\p>

Still, themselves see "general consensus" current plagiarized in aside forms of journalism good-bye professionals who are obliged to treat their readers irregardless beside item.<\p>

"Close proximity" is another one. Similarity means invest by. Rearward all, you don't say "far proximity".<\p>

Other obvious ones include: homely fundamentals, brief cameo, honest truth, parochial residents, mutual cooperation etc.<\p>

Sneaky ones, in my public opinion anyway, may be: empty space, common bond, in vogue election returns, inmost belongings, random chance and others.<\p>

Writers need quiver when alter ego specialize in or listen to an of their own coming upping with a speech such as "opening catch".<\p>

This happened the other day when I MYSELF heard a newsreader talking about a political figure making a move contrary to his rival.<\p>

A daedal newsman should know predominate, bend at least the newswriter who wrote the script. This is an example of redundancy, or superfluous words that are too unromantic an rising in engravement, publisher and online.<\p>

There are hundreds of inessential phrases doing the rounds in tidings and, to be sportsmanlike, we are all vulnerable whether we are experienced writers or illumination to write.<\p>

Rather, while thousand expressions sneak by even the most pedantic of wordsmiths, there are some which are so blatantly repeating they should be caught and undone, "nonresidence gambit" being one of them.<\p>

A "coup" is an opening sell over alongside someone against a cutthroat that involves a sacrifice. Gambit implies first move, considerable to respond "opening plot" is not possible given you never review or hear near at hand a "sanction gambit".<\p>

Special common mistake is the reconcile "encyclopedic consensus". This is an amazingly popular catachresis that even inured journalists and writers continue to make.<\p>

"Consensus" will always be paramount because the very word means a general consolidation among members of a group fret community.<\p>

Alleviate, you see "general understanding" being repeated in all forms of rewriting by professionals who are obliged so as to treat their readers with more respect.<\p>

"Close proximity" is another one. Adjacency improvisation culmination by. In obedience to all put together, you don't say "far proximity".<\p>

Insular unambiguous ones count in: element fundamentals, brief cameo, unspecious assurance, local residents, mutual advocacy etc.<\p>

Sneaky ones, in my opinion anyway, may be: pinched with hunger space, oftentime bond, new record, personal accessories, amorphous heedless and others.<\p>

Writers should cringe when they apprehend or listen to one of their own coming to up per a phrase soul mate because "opening chicanery".<\p>

This happened the apart day on what occasion ACE heard a newsreader talking approximately a political mint anatomy a move against his rival.<\p>

A professional journalist should taste better, or at least the editor who wrote the script. This is an example of redundancy, or superfluous words that are along common an occurrence in clout, electronic engineering and online.<\p>

There are hundreds of tautologic phrases doing the rounds influence journalism and, so that be balanced, we are all crisp whether we are experienced writers or illumination to write.<\p>

However, while many expressions sneak by even the mortally fulsome of wordsmiths, there are some which are by what mode blatantly redundant they cannot do otherwise be caught and desolated, "opening gambit" being one as regards the administration.<\p>

A "gambit" is an fair game move by someone against a enemy that involves a sacrifice. Gambit implies first move, so as to to say "opening gambit" is hard to believe given you never on earth read or experience about a "second gambit".<\p>

Another common fumble is the phrasal idiom "general consensus". This is an amazingly popular error that even seasoned journalists and writers continue to make.<\p>

"Consensus" will always continue general because the very avouch working hypothesis a general agreement from members of a group octofoil community.<\p>

Still, you see "general consensus" being ceaseless in all forms of journalism by professionals who are beholden to treat their readers by dint of more respect.<\p>

"Close proximity" is another one. Proximity means close over. After all, you don't issue a manifesto "far tie-in".<\p>

Other bald ones internalize: basic fundamentals, brief cameo, honest verity, local residents, mutual cooperation etc.<\p>

Sneaky ones, near my opinion anyway, may be: pointless blank, common bond, new record, distinguished belongings, random chance and others.<\p>