okay iām sorry to beat a dead horse but iām angry about this again. i genuinely cannot believe that we did not get an OUNCE of izzy backstory beyond āoh he and ed have known each for a REALLY long timeā (and even then thereās inconsistencies in the amount of time implied). like. not one single flashback to his childhood, or to him and ed when they were younger
now, only three characters in the show actually get backstory flashbacks: ed, stede, and jim. why ed and stede get flashbacks is obvious, but jim is interesting because they only really get flashbacks because their backstory in season one affects the showās plot. after that, they kind of just get pushed to the side
but izzy is an extremely important character from day one, and he becomes even more crucial to the plot in season two. and i think part of the reason why a lot of people still hate his character is because we never get an explanation for WHY he acts the way he does. we can infer, but without anything concrete itās very easy to just dismiss it as him being an asshole
i really think a flashback to how his and edās relationship used to be was very needed, and an explanation for how everything went downhill and why the two of them turned out the way they did. we can gather that they were very close, and their relationship deteriorated due to ed getting bored of being blackbeard, but thereās so many little nuances to their relationship that are never really explained
not to mention that, in my opinion, izzy has more unexplained character details than any other character in the show. roachās character design has a lot of details, but as far as iām aware all of them have been explained, just not in-show. and of course wee john has all his tattoos, but those are just kristian nairnās actual tattoos, so i donāt think they really count as character details
but we never get any kind of explanation (whether in-show or not) for izzyās āxā tattoo, or the spade on his hand, or why he only wears one leather glove, or the RING ON HIS TIE, or the fucking LASH SCARS ON HIS BACK. those last two especially drive me fucking insane to think about
because with the ring, some people think that con oāneill requested to have it for his mother, but he actually only asked them to change the gem to an emerald. the ring was always going to be there. but, again, why? itās so strange to me to have a pirate, and especially one who (at least in season one) totes being a pirate as this big, scary, masculine career, wear a dainty little ring around his neck with absolutely no explanation as to why
and with the lash scars, that is SO MUCH makeup and special effects work just for them to a.) never be addressed, even though stede could clearly see them; and b.) be barely even visible to the viewer because of the dim light and the lack of a clear shot of them
and idk if you guys have seen that BTS picture of the scars, but uh. there are a LOT of them. and again, where the fuck did they come from? i use them as fuel for my headcanon that izzy was in the navy, but is that what weāre meant to assume? is that whatās being implied here? or is it that he served on hornigoldās crew with ed and jack, even though thatās also never mentioned? did ed give them to him? we know he canonically enjoys pain (thanks for that at least, guys), at least to a certain extent, so is it meant to be implied that he had that done to him as a kink thing? is it supposed to be a joke and thatās why itās never addressed?
i truly donāt know. i can talk myself in circles about this for hours, but at the end of the day the only good answers i can think of for why izzy didnāt get a backstory are budget and bad writing. and no, it really isnāt that serious, and iāll move on eventually, but itās still just extremely disappointing to me. okay, rant over