Aaah, so there's this NHK program where it's like "the Nobubrat that you thought was dumb is actually smart though". It's something I would've wanted to watch, but I don't have NHK (and I don't know how to rent/buy/access the episode it "on demand").
Thankfully some guy provided a rather detailed summary of the program's content. Basically there were letter artefacts that indicate that Hideyoshi did view Nobukatsu with highest respect, and his tactics in Komaki-Nagakute was actually good.
As much as I like this interpretation, without seeing what the actual artefacts and how things work I can't judge for myself whether it's all forced and crock, or if it has merit.
Like, there's this part where they said he "consolidated his territory(?)" by focusing on pacifying the Iga riots or something. Which, based on my own reading of what little text I have access to, doesn't feel like it. It seems to me he wasn't confident that he could put up a stand if he entered Azuchi, and just turned back and left.
But there's still missing details that I don't have, like whether he even moved out to Azuchi at all, or if he never even headed there, and just focused on Iga right away.
Anyway, the Shizugatake circumstances is important. If as of Shizugatake Hideyoshi is still acting respectful, even if he's just pretending that could mean that the big dramatic seppuku Nobutaka did was false.
Like, that had always sounded absurd to me. Even if people can and will do crazy things in legitimate records, I always cautiously assume outlandish stories to be false first. Edo era stories tend to be super crazy and then turn out to be false, so I don't trust crazy stories now.
They're fun to tell on a fictional basis (for spice in otome/other Sengoku fiction), but for history it's just bunk.
Like, maybe it's just a respectable seppuku and Nobutaka is like "ah damn, my brother defeated me, I guess" and there's no dramatic tantrum of throwing bloody guts at the wall.
That, and that also means Nobukatsu bringing down the order of death on his brother was his own prerogative as the "leader", and not because he's Hideyoshi's underling.
The Komaki-Nagakute one is also something I really want to see the paper trails/maps for, because typically this was seen as "Ieyasu's battle", and I really want to know how the army movements went. Even when some of those annoying pop infotainment article acknowledge that Nobukatsu was the figurehead, they still claim Ieyasu did a lot of the work.
Also, this program mentioned that both Ieyasu and Nobukatsu were in accordance to want to negotiate peace with Hideyoshi. That would explain why Ieyasu wasn't pissed that Nobukatsu randomly just went "Nope, I'm done" and made peace instead of pushing ahead for victory. The reason the program said why Ieyasu and Hideyoshi still has beef afterwards is because the Tokugawa side of the negotiations failed, while Hideyoshi's agreement with Nobukatsu went through just fine. I need more info about this, because like... what happened???
I really want the details for why there's peace treaty. Wikipedia has been updated to now say that Hideyoshi was too strong, sacked too many of the castles, so both Nobukatsu and Ieyasu thought it was a lost cause and agreed to try to negotiate for peace.
Also, apparently Hideyoshi was already offered the post of shogun shortly after Komaki Nagakute but he said no, WTF.
I'm even more confused now honestly, but hopefully more info will come out and people will finally stop treating Komaki Nagakute like a Hideyoshi vs Ieyasu battle.