Olivier Messaien, Vingt regards sur l'enfant-Jésus (1944)
Robert/Clara, Barenboim/du PrĂ©, Chopin/Sand, the Mahlers, and hey, Britten/Pears, why not?âlikewise Messaien/Loriod as muse and musette, angel and prophet, these pairwise âdefinitionsâ blurred and shifting, each half-erased into the otherâs substance, indistinguishable. This was, is, TurangalĂźla recrystallised, shorn of all orchestral pomp and vaguery so as to clarify its mystic figures, e.g. compare the Symphonieâs Joie du Sang des Ătoiles with the tenth contemplation, de l'Esprit de joie, and its âair de chasseââand hear the same ecstasy pierced through both. And compositionally TurangalĂźla and the Vingt regards both involve the exploration, throughout the workâs length, of a set of themes, and but so consider the latterâs ThĂšme de Dieu as a consonant sibling of the formerâs statue themeâthough one is no doubt more menacing, both are equally monumental.
Alban Berg, Piano Sonata (1910)
No wonder Gershwin did balk before Berg for even in the Op. 1 we find those distant kin of the dominant seventh that came to characterise le Jazz hot and the 30s showtunes that were to follow: ninths straight, flat, sharp, raised elevenths, etc. (tritones abundant) and but plus the obligatory Second Viennese complexity. And then formwise you could reveal without too much effort a sonata-allegro proper with first and second subject, though over a harmony that does to Tristan what Tristan did to cadential resolutionâwhere Wagner defied catechism by witholding arrival until Isoldeâs Liebestod, three hours after the Tristan chord was posed, Berg here, with a chord of his own (C#-G-B-F#, see measure 1.1), defies Wagnerian extenuation and crafts not temporal distance but extreme harmonic distance, a drawing far, far out, even beyond harmony itself, before returning and resolving C#-G-B-F# to a B-minor in mock excuse for the otherwise utterly useless key signature, comical against the forest of accidentals and deviant spellings of basic triadsâa parody that was to foreshadow Boulezâs attempt to âdestroy the first-movement sonata formâ (given the nature of the DeuxiĂšme sonate, the violence of phrase here is apt, if not still wanting).
Richard Strauss, Ein Heldenleben (1898)
Horn players owe much to, for one, Joseph Leutgeb, for whom Mozart wrote his four seminal horn concertos, and for another, whomsoever it was that coaxed the young Brahms into learning the natural hornâand for a third take Franz Strauss, perhaps fourth in the hierarchy of musically renowned Strausses, but yet father to (I would argue) the first, and also a horn player, this being one of the reasons the son Richard wrote so favourably for the instrument in compositions not just limited to the two concertos, for particularly in the tone-poems there unfolds line after line of sublime horn figures both in tutti and in solo, and Ein Heldenleben is no exception, e.g. the opening motif tracing E-flat major up two octaves and a third (precisely the range and tonality of the opening to Das Rheingoldâshuddering drone in the primeval depths, Wagnerâs very own Creation) before leaping a resplendent fifth (you could, perhaps should, play it on one harmonic, you know, let loose the F-sideâs brazen upper register)âhow many do you need; what numbers will suffice for this chilling tutti? As many as Don Juan? Or six horns? Eight?
Alexander Scriabin, Prométhée / Le poÚme du feu (1910)
Was the (comparatively) tamer PoĂšme de l'extase merely a flexing of the mystic vice that was yet metastasising headwards, the madness advacing synapse by synapse over the Russianâs mind? From those glittering motifs to these sinuous trails so wicked, indulgent, languishing, daemonic; a thoroughly Romantic treatment of dissonance left unresolved and begging for a full 20 or so minutes, to close on an F#-major sonority, this sole consonance robbed by all preceding of any harmonic meaning; a resolution that should have carried all the gratification of a V-I but which context-less, key-less, was only more sound, brighter-timbred, yes, but still only noiseâand this was Scriabinâs atonality (kin with Debussy, BartĂłk).
Igor Stravinsky, Agon (1957)
Well it hardly sounds like âart musicâ in the Teutonic sense but of course Stravinsky had long since outgrown the lineage that drew from Sebastian Bach to Ludwig van to Wagner to early Schoenberg to (and this perhaps the greatest leap) Schoenberg proper. No, the Russian cosmopolitanâs aesthetic was to keep aloof, study from without, gaze from distant vantages (both cultural and physical), e.g. from Paris examining his homeland folk, from California examining Europe itself. It was cubism in music, though there was yet one perspective he had still to include in his palette, and not until dodecaphony had become history (âSCHOENBERG IS DEADâ) did the chameleon enter his third, and final phase.