Of course someone who thinks its okay to let dogs hump zoophiles (which btw shouldn't be tolerated or encouraged or else it'll cause behavioural issues and can definitely be considered *contact*) is neutral on a community that inherently accepts abuse, rape, pro-contact and shit like "transnazi". Neutrality doesn't exist for stuff like that.
If this is about the comment Melody made on a post asking if believing dogs should be allowed to hump humans without reciprocation was considered comp contact, why would you go to Melodyβs profile to check for Melodyβs stance on radqueerness and send a hate anon about it instead of just replying to the comment there
Also the fact that you immediately think βso you let ZOOPHILES get humped?β is paramisia. Itβs not suddenly more dangerous when the person letting the dog express their silly dog behaviour is zoophilic. If you think itβs bad, then itβs bad for everyone. Get rid of your double standards.
Also thereβs bad people in everywhere. Yeah there are transitioning transharmfuls and pro abuse paraphiles. But radqueer doesnβt equal pro-harm and neu radqueer doesnβt equal neu-harm.
