seen from China
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from Sweden
seen from Malaysia
seen from China
seen from France
seen from China
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from Germany
seen from China
seen from Netherlands
seen from Malaysia
seen from Malaysia
seen from Germany
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States
"Miss Marx" biopic de Susanna Nicchiarelli (2020) - sur la vie d'Eleanor Marx (1855-1898), fille cadette de Karl Marx (1818-1883) - avec Romola Garai, Patrick Kennedy, John Gordon Sinclair, Felicity Montagu, Oliver Chris, Karina Fernandez et George Arrendell, mars 2024.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
{T}he smartphone has eroded the limits of the workday in almost every pocket of the economy. Effective altruists, the techy philosophy cadre lately made famous by the disgraced entrepreneur Sam Bankman-Fried, say the threat of artificial intelligence is that it may someday become conscious, like Skynet in Terminator, and decide to oppress us. The Right to Be Lazy suggests that machines have already been used to that end for nearly 250 years.
https://www.theatlantic.com/books/archive/2023/01/right-to-be-lazy-quiet-quitting-work/672698/?utm_source=pocket_reader
After hauling in the last sack of looted weaponry from the Hanse, Geralt crosses his arms before an alarmed Lafargue.
The man is too polite to gasp. At least the smith is not afraid. The Witcher would feel guilty after all the fine work the grandmaster had done for him.
“Do you buy in bulk?” Geralt asks.
He looks at the pile and grimaces. “There’s a discount for all the... stains.”
Lafargue blinks and collects himself.
“Oh my. How many clubs, maces, and swords? Also, are the swords of Beauclair, Nilfgaard, or Skellige?”
The Witcher smiles. Geralt loves Toussaint.
Super quick sketchbook comic ~ I’m doing my deathmarch new game + run and the biggest issue I’ve been having is selling all my loot. Lafargue is the only one rich enough to buy everything. Not that I need the crowns... but it’s hard NOT to loot everything... what can I say I’m a greedy goblin.
The reaction I give capitalism when it wants to exploid my manpower and fob me off with the promise off social promotion which will never happen
In France the long expected split has taken place. The original conjunction of Guesde and Lafargue with Malon and Brousse was no doubt unavoidable when the party was founded, but Marx and I never had any illusions that it could last. The issue is purely one of principle: is the struggle to be conducted as a class struggle of the proletariat against the bourgeoisie, or is it to be permitted that in good opportunist (or as it is called in the Socialist translation: possibilist) style the class character of the movement, together with the programme, are everywhere to be dropped where there is a chance of winning more votes, more adherents, by this means. Malon and Brousse, by declaring themselves in favour of the latter alternative, have sacrificed the proletarian class character of the movement and made separation inevitable. All the better. The development of the proletariat proceeds everywhere amidst internal struggles and France, which is now forming a workers’ party for the first time, is no exception. We in Germany have got beyond the first phase of the internal struggle, other phases still lie before us. Unity is quite a good thing so long as it is possible, but there are things which stand higher than unity. And when, like Marx and myself, one has fought harder all one’s life long against the alleged Socialists than against anyone else (for we only regarded the bourgeoisie as a class and hardly ever involved ourselves in conflicts with individual bourgeois), one cannot greatly grieve that the inevitable struggle has broken out.
Friedrich Engels’ letter to August Bebel, London, October 28, 1882.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
O Laziness, mother of the arts and noble virtues, be thou the balm of human anguish
Paul Lafargue
Un dogma disastroso
Una strana follia possiede le classi operaie delle nazioni in cui regna la civiltà capitalista. È una follia che porta con sé miserie individuali e sociali che da due secoli torturano la triste umanità. Questa follia è l’amore per il lavoro, la passione mortale per il lavoro, spinta fino all’esaurimento delle forze vitali dell’individuo e della sua progenie. Invece di reagire contro quest’aberrazione mentale, i preti, gli economisti, i moralisti hanno santificato il lavoro, lo hanno sacralizzato. Uomini ciechi e ottusi, hanno voluto essere più saggi del loro Dio; uomini deboli e spregevoli, hanno voluto riabilitare ciò che il loro Dio aveva maledetto. Io, che non mi dichiaro cristiano, economo e morale, contro il loro giudizio mi appello a quello del loro Dio; alle prediche della loro morale religiosa, economica, di liberi pensatori, oppongo le spaventose conseguenze del lavoro nella società capitalista. Nella società capitalista il lavoro è la causa di ogni degenerazione intellettuale, di ogni deformazione fisica.
P. Lafargue, [Le droit à la paresse. Réfutation du «droit au travail», (1848). La religion du Capital (1886)], Il diritto all'ozio. La religione del capitale, Firenze, Il Ponte Ed., 2015 [Trad. L. Binni]
παίζοντας με το chatGPT
———
«1880. Άνοιξη. Ο Γάλλος πολιτικός Jules Gueste επισκέπτεται τον Μαρξ στο Λονδίνο προκειμένου να συντάξουν από κοινού το πρόγραμμα που ο εν λόγω πολιτικός σκοπεύει να προτείνει στο ιδρυτικό συνέδριο του Εργατικού Κόμματος της Γαλλίας. Τα αιτήματα του προγράμματος διαμορφώνονται από τους Μαρξ-Gueste, με τη συμβολή των Ένγκελς και Πολ Λαφάργκ. Με το που εγκρίθηκε το πρόγραμμα, προκύπτουν διαφωνίες: Ο Gueste και ο Λαφάργκ (παρεμπιπτόντως, ο Λαφάργκ ήταν γαμπρός του Μαρξ) θεωρούσαν πως τα αιτήματα του συνεδρίου δεν ήταν παρά πρόσχημα για την προσέλκυση ακροατηρίου —ο στόχος, γι αυτούς, ήταν πρωτίστως να χάσουν οι εργάτες τις αυταπάτες τους, όσον αφορά το ενδεχόμενο βελτίωσης του συστήματος. Ο Μαρξ διαφωνεί! Θεωρεί πως όσα προγραμματικά αναφέρονται είναι επιτεύξιμα στα πλαίσια του Καπιταλισμού. Μάλιστα σε επιστολή του προς τους δυο, σημειώνει, μεταξύ άλλων, πως αν αυτοί ήταν μαρξιστές, όπως διατείνονταν, τότε “ce qu'il y a de certain c'est que moi, je ne suis pas Marxiste” [=αυτό που είναι βέβαιο είναι ότι εγώ δεν είμαι μαρξιστής]»
