Framing Star Wars, narrative implications, all roads lead back to colonial violence
Title: Chasing Wild Space: Narrative Outsides and World-Building Frontiers in Knights of the Old Republic and The Old Republic by Cody Mejeur
As I continue my foray into watching all of Star Wars with the first two episodes of Andor, I found myself asking not about the big picture of the larger story, but the frame itself. I talked with (sometimes at) my brother--who is visiting for a few days and is my primary source for all things SW--about the implications of "A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away". Who is this narrator? What is this narrator's relationship to the SW galaxy? Is it us, the Milky Way Galaxy human from Earth? Is it a third party external to both our galaxy and theirs? Will the narrative eventually end? How so? What do the answers to these questions imply about the story of Star Wars itself? What is the story that Star Wars, as a whole, is setting out to tell?
I'll admit, the depth I have found in this series sometimes feels miraculously accidental and only possible due to its vastness and, consequently, it's necessary specificity and focus of its various entries. Every Star Wars story is not about finally defeating whatever current version of the fascistic empire that is at bat, but about the one thing (big or small) a specific group of people did to make that, eventually, possible. The big win, so to speak, of Star Wars has yet to come as it is presently the only logical narrative ending to the story of Star Wars.
Mejeur's chapter describes and analyzes the narrative and ethical implications of how SW, through two of its video game entries, utilizes Wild Space and frontiers and how these mirror american imperial and colonial violence. I've heard much talk, primarily praise, of Andor and how revolutionary it is. I was skeptical, but after watching the original and prequel trilogies, I have come to understand how politically audacious the series is despite its reputation and that of its bros.
Andor does indeed (at least within the only two episodes I have watched) present fertile ground for this exact exploration. It's worth reading the closing paragraph of the chapter in full:
Outside spaces play a significant role in world-building and it is crucial to develop an ethics in how we represent and use them in order to avoid inadvertently re-inscribing the colonial mythology of the frontier. I suggest that there is another meaning or approach to outside space—one that can help break the cycle of narrative violence evident in Star Wars. One can face outside spaces and learn from them in ways that are not violent, controlling, and xenophobic. Certainly, one should resist threats of conquest and domination whenever and wherever they manifest themselves. But outside spaces are not always-already evil threats and expansion through conquest does not need to be the dominant mode of the hyperdiegetic cycle. Instead, one could embrace the outside, the unknown, the strange, and the other, along with the insights and new possibilities they hold. Only by seeking such paths can we hope to unlock the transformative power of hyperdiegesis and outside spaces, and to build narrative worlds that are more inclusive, equal, and just.
Allowing the Kenari scenes to exist without transcribing subtitles draws the viewer in at a disadvantaged and vulnerable position, into the position of guest instead of that of outlander or conqueror. I don't yet know the details or fate of Kenari and its people, nor do I fully comprehend the political reality of mid-rim planets during Galactic Empire times, but I'm intrigued about how this positionality (inner, outer, mid rim) to the imperial core can influence Rebellious tendencies. Perhaps that is what Fanon meant by identifying the rural peasant as the central revolutionary. If so, does Andor present the narrative rectification that the sequel trilogy was unable to deliver on by making Rey a Palpatine-Skywalker instead of the galactic nobody-everybody?