'Antiwar protest in front of Australian Parliament House, 2003 [Photographer: David Foote]' Credit: National Archives of Australia (Item ID: 14844091)
seen from United States

seen from France
seen from Malaysia
seen from Vietnam

seen from Mexico
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Netherlands
seen from Germany
seen from Brazil
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Japan

seen from Germany
seen from Japan
seen from Russia
seen from Germany
seen from United States

seen from China
'Antiwar protest in front of Australian Parliament House, 2003 [Photographer: David Foote]' Credit: National Archives of Australia (Item ID: 14844091)

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Now premiering on The Disinfo Detox: “Manufacturing the 9/11 Generation: Patriotism, Propaganda, and the Lies We Were Told.” Matthew Warshauer
So much about 9/11 remains hidden from the American public — this episode pulls back the curtain.
Hamas has called for Tony Blair to be tried in international courts for his crimes, particularly during the Iraq War, and opposes any plan involving him in Gaza’s governance. #Hamas #TonyBlair #Palestine #IraqWar #InternationalJustice ⚖️🌍
The stark details of the stunning collapse in local reporting: "Local Journalist Index 2025" @muckrack.com @rebuildlocalnews.bsky.social
(Plus- Novak outs Plame)
Read all about it: https://roughlydaily.com/2025/07/14/were-it-left-to-me-to-decide-whether-we-should-have-a-government-without-newspapers-or-newspapers-without-a-government-i-should-not-hesitate-a-moment-to-prefer-the-latter/
Review of "Iraq: The Rape of a Country" by Terry Gardiner 👉 https://youtu.be/LKCWSiZbaEQ
#acikulatbuku #ulasanbuku #bookreview #iraqtherapeofacountry #terrygardiner #geopolitics #iraqwar #ulatbuku #bookworm #bookdragon

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
The American people who claim a moral high ground have been committing terrorism against us and our people for decades. This is from 2005.
There’s no doubt that they’re suffering from their evil crimes and will suffer further in their afterlife.
Tony Blair: A Paradox in Politics
After watching the BBC Documentary Blair & Brown: The New Labour Revolution you can't deny that in the realm of politics, few figures have left as indelible a mark as Tony Blair. A charismatic and dynamic leader, Blair's tenure as the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom from 1997 to 2007 was marked by a blend of modernization, economic prosperity, and, unfortunately, controversy. While I find myself at odds with Blair on several key issues, most notably regarding Northern Ireland and the Iraq War, one cannot deny the undeniable charm that defined his political persona.
Blair's charisma was a potent force that permeated both domestic and international politics. His eloquence and oratory skills were often cited as instrumental in winning the hearts and minds of the British public. Blair possessed a rare ability to connect with people, transcending traditional political boundaries. His communication style was polished, persuasive, and relatable, enabling him to navigate complex issues with apparent ease.
However, my disagreement with Blair on matters such as Northern Ireland and the Iraq War remains steadfast. The decision to involve Britain in the Iraq War in 2003, based on intelligence that later proved to be flawed, resulted in significant consequences and sparked widespread public dissent. Additionally, Blair's approach to the Northern Ireland peace process drew criticism for its compromises and concessions.
Despite these contentious decisions, Blair's charisma remained a powerful force. It is this enigmatic quality that allowed him to weather political storms, maintain popularity, and secure three consecutive terms as Prime Minister. Even in the face of opposition and skepticism, Blair's charm often seemed to provide a shield, deflecting some of the criticisms that might have been more damaging to a less charismatic leader.
The paradox of disagreeing with Blair on substantive policy matters while acknowledging his charisma raises questions about the nature of leadership in politics. Charisma can be a double-edged sword, as it has the potential to rally support and create a positive image, but it may also be used to mask controversial decisions or distract from substantive issues.
As I reflect on the legacy of Tony Blair, it is essential to appreciate the complexities that define political leadership. Charisma, while a captivating quality, should not overshadow a critical evaluation of policy decisions and their real-world consequences. In recognising Blair's charisma, we must also remain vigilant in holding leaders accountable for the choices they make, even when wrapped in the allure of charm.
How 9/11 Was Used To Sell A War
The 9/11 attacks, a tragic and devastating event, not only shook the United States but also played a pivotal role in shaping the country's foreign policy, including the decision to wage war. Let's explore how this tragic event was leveraged to sell a war.👈
1. Immediate Response: In the immediate aftermath of 9/11, there was a profound sense of shock and anger across the nation. The desire for justice and retribution was palpable, and the U.S. government swiftly launched a global campaign to root out the perpetrators responsible for the attacks.
2. Linking 9/11 to Terrorism: The U.S. government, led by President George W. Bush, made a deliberate effort to connect the 9/11 attacks to terrorism, specifically the extremist group Al-Qaeda, led by Osama bin Laden. This linkage created a powerful narrative that framed the attacks as an act of war rather than a criminal act.
3. The War on Terror: The phrase "War on Terror" became a central theme in the government's response. The administration asserted that the United States was at war with terrorists and the states that harbored them. This framing created a sense of urgency and a mandate for military action.
4. The Invasion of Afghanistan: In October 2001, the U.S. initiated Operation Enduring Freedom, invading Afghanistan with the primary goal of toppling the Taliban regime, which had provided a safe haven for Al-Qaeda. The connection between the 9/11 attacks and the need to eliminate terrorism was a powerful selling point for this military action.
5. The Iraq Invasion: The 9/11 attacks were also used to justify the invasion of Iraq in 2003. The U.S. government asserted that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) and had links to terrorism. While these claims were later disputed and proved to be inaccurate, they were instrumental in building public support for the war.
6. Political Rhetoric and Public Opinion: Key political figures frequently invoked the memory of 9/11 to garner public support for military actions. The fear of another terrorist attack and the desire to prevent future threats were powerful emotional drivers that influenced public opinion.
7. The Patriot Act and Enhanced Security Measures: The government also used the post-9/11 environment to push for legislative changes, including the passage of the Patriot Act. This legislation expanded law enforcement and surveillance powers, further emphasizing the need for a comprehensive response to the threat of terrorism.
8. Long-Term Consequences: The use of 9/11 to sell a war had profound and long-lasting consequences. The wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, initiated in response to the attacks, lasted for years and had complex geopolitical ramifications. The rhetoric surrounding these conflicts also sparked debates about civil liberties, international relations, and the role of the United States in the world.
In conclusion, the 9/11 attacks were a turning point in U.S. history, not only in terms of national security but also in the way they were used to justify military action. The emotional impact of the attacks, coupled with the fear of future terrorism, played a significant role in selling the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq to the American public and the world. The consequences of these decisions continue to be debated and scrutinized to this day.