The Interview Project: Bio Natsci (2016)
So, hereâs my experience at an interview for Bio NatSci. Apart from the actual interview, I first had to sit the Natural Sciences Admissions Assessment (NSAA), which I did at my school in early November I think. 2016 was the first year it was set, which was bad because I had very little idea of what to expect, but good because it was the same for the examiners/admissions officers at Cam (at least, I told myself that). I prepared using the NSAA specifications provided by the university, which if Iâm not mistaken is quite close to the A Levels specifications for Biology, Chemistry, Physics and Maths. Since I did IB and wasnât finished with my courses yet, I hadnât done all of what was on the specification, so I got some help from my teachers (strongly suggested it if thereâs something on the spec you havenât learned yet!!).
I wonât go into a lot of detail on what the assessment is made up of (you can read about it here if you go to entrance requirements), but I couldnât finish a single section, felt very unsure about what I had filled out, and essentially thought I had done a horrible job and was hoping that my personal statement and predicted grades would make up for it. To be fair though, I didnât spend an exorbitant amount of time preparing for the assessment, so for better prep Iâd recommend doing all the past papers for the NSAA you can find on the Cam website (they arenât a lot though, so it would probably also be a good idea to do it in a timed setting) since thatâs as close as youâll get to the type of questions in the actual assessment. Obviously, being Cam, the questions are quite challenging (at least they were in my opinion and as far as I can remember), and you arenât supposed to be able to finish them all I think, but the negative feelings I left the exam room with were pretty unsettling.
As for my interview, I found out about it around two weeks prior to the interview date. They were in the first week of December, and I stayed overnight at college since I donât live nearby. I arrived on Monday evening, my two interviews were Tuesday morning and I left again around noon on Tuesday. I met a few other interviewees on the bus and at dinner in college (as well as current students), and we also hung out in some sort of common room after dinner but to be honest I thought it was pretty awkward. I was quite nervous, I think the others were as well, and since we were all interviewing for NatSci we were pretty much each otherâs competition. I went to bed quite early, had breakfast the next morning and went straight to my first interview.
Some general things about both interviews: they were in the interviewerâs offices, in a casual and relaxed setting (i.e. sitting in armchairs or around a table); the interviewers were all very friendly; they only asked academic questions (nothing related to my personal statement); I had to do some data analysis and provide some answers in a graphical form, and the interviews themselves passed by extremely quickly.
My first interview consisted of biology-related questions, mostly ecology if I remember correctly. Not sure if this makes sense since Iâm not allowed to say what the actual questions were, but it was basically two questions that we each discussed in more detail. So the interviewers would present me with a scenario or an âopening questionâ and ask me questions about the scenario, going into more and more depth (and they also got more challenging). It was mostly critical thinking questions based on subject knowledge, for example how I would design an experiment to investigate a phenomenon I had learned about at school and how I could modify the experiment to make it better.
I had over an hour between the interviews, so I walked around college a bit and then spent some time in a waiting room that was run by current students as well. Some of the interviewees were chatting a bit, there was tea, coffee and biscuits as well. Most of them were also interviewing for science- or technology-related subjects (engineering, maths, natsci). Personally I found the waiting room more nerve-wracking than calming, because again some of them were also interviewing for NatSci and I couldnât help but think that they were much smarter than me, would do better in their interviews, and would get a spot while I wouldnât.
My second interview consisted of biochemistry-related questions. Again, it was two or three questions that were each discussed in more detail, and the questions got progressively more challenging. Especially for one question I remember that it moved further away from what I had learned and by the end of it I wasnât so much using my preexisting knowledge, but rather basing my answer on previous answers â I felt like through the questions they asked, the interviewers were presenting me with knowledge I already had that I then used to answer unfamiliar questions. Overall, I felt I had done a lot better in the second interview than I did in the first, mostly because I prefer biochemistry to ecology.
TL;DR: Study for the NSAA but donât worry if it goes badly since it doesnât make or break your application; interviewers tend to be kind and relaxed; be prepared for questions that progressively move you out of your academic comfort zone (but arenât too far away from what youâve learned), and make sure youâre confident with thinking and discussing answers in a graphical/visual form.
Hope that helps!! :)











