RIP 🪦

seen from China

seen from Germany

seen from United States
seen from Montenegro
seen from Canada
seen from Ireland
seen from France
seen from China
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Malaysia
seen from Germany
seen from China

seen from United States
seen from Canada
seen from Georgia

seen from United States

seen from Sweden
seen from Venezuela

seen from Venezuela

seen from Venezuela
RIP 🪦

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
The @guardian @guardiannews along with Editor-in-chief @katharineviner promote disinformation, foreign influence and interventionism in US policy and politics with their fundraiser AGAINST President Elect @realDonaldTrump. Doesn't Labour, Starmer and the UK have enough problems of their own without interfering AGAIN with the US election? #AlliesDon'tDoThis
(article starts after Holby story)
Marius Borg Holby, detained in August after an incident at a woman’s apartment in Oslo, was arrested on Monday evening
“The defenders of interventionism often appeal to the notion that classical liberalism belongs to a past era. Today, they tell us, we are living in the age of "constructive economic policy," namely, interventionism. The wheel of history cannot be turned back, and that which has vanished cannot be restored. He who calls for classical liberalism and thus proclaims the solution as "back to Adam Smith" is demanding the impossible.
It is not at all true that contemporary liberalism is identical with the British liberalism of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. Certainly modern liberalism is built on the great ideas developed by Hume, Adam Smith, Ricardo, Bentham, and Wilhelm Humboldt. But liberalism is no closed doctrine and rigid dogma. It is an application of the principles of science to man's social life, to politics. Economics and social science have made great strides since the beginning of liberal doctrine, and thus liberalism also had to change, although the basic thought remained unaltered.
He who makes the effort to study modern liberalism will soon discover the differences between the two. He will learn that knowledge of liberalism cannot be derived from Adam Smith alone, and that the demand for repeal of interventionistic measures is not identical with the call, Return to Adam Smith.
Modern liberalism differs from the liberalism of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries at least as much as modern interventionism differs from the mercantilism of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. It is illogical to call the return to free trade an anachronism if the return to the system of protection and prohibition is not also seen as an anachronism.
Writers who credit the change in economic policy simply to the spirit of the age surely expect very little from a scientific explanation of interventionism. The capitalist spirit is said to have been replaced by the spirit of the hampered economy. Capitalism has grown old and, therefore, must yield to the new. And this new is said to be the economy that is hampered by government and other intervention. Anyone who seriously believes that such statements can refute the conclusions of economics regarding the effects of import duties and price controls truly cannot be helped.” - Ludwig von Mises, ‘A Critique of Interventionism’ (1929) [p. 58, 59]
~ na skin de trabalhador sksksksks

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
“Every time the United States ‘saves’ a country, it leaves it turned into a madhouse or a cemetery.”
—Eduardo Galeano
As a rule of thumb, if you hear about the alleged crimes of any enemy country, consider the following:
Are the working people of that country able to organize & potentially express organic leverage against that issue?
Would evidence of foreign intervention hinder the efforts/legitimacy of those groups more than it would accomplish?
Are there other interests whose conditions foreign intervention would impose on them that would leave their situation worse than it began?
If the above are true, regardless of the verifiable information presented, perhaps try focusing on domestic concerns where you can actually work to change conditions.
There are always more countries out there in the world where potential crimes may be committed, and empires don't tend to have the greatest attention spans when it comes to the more boring maintenance side of foreign intervention.
For you it may be "an intervention we did decades ago", but people have to live their lives in the wake of it.
The response from the West to this development [of trade between China and African countries] has been a military one. Economic dependence on the West has been replaced by a new military dependence. If African countries are no longer reliant on Western loans, export markets, and investment finance, they are now reliant on Western military aid. The U.S. Africa Command, or AFRICOM, provides military aid and has put most African states under the effective military control of the United States.
Since the 1950s, U.S. and Western European-dominated institutions like the World Trade Organization, World Bank, and International Monetary