*Spoilers for the new How to Train Your Dragon, read at your own risk*
Which okay yes I know how everyone feels about live action remakes. Believe me, I feel the same way. But my sister is a huge HTTYD fan and wanted to see it so we went together. Here is my review:
Overall, this is literally the same movie. Practically shot for shot. I mean the dialogue was the same, the camera angles were the same, the music was the same. It was like 90% How to Train Your Dragon (2010). Didnât add much, didnât subtract much, but there were a few differences.
The biggest one, I would say, is that the chief of the tribe is apparently not a dynastic position. There are a couple characters who mention something about wanting to be chief someday, which I think was just inherited originally. Astrid especially is vying to be chief, which is even brought up by Hiccup when he mentions how Stoick would probably be proud to have Astrid as his successor since sheâs everything that Hiccup isnât. Also, in the original, the Viking teens dislike Hiccup because heâs puny and awkward and just Not Like Them, and in this version thatâs part of it, but the main reason they donât like him is essentially because heâs a nepo baby. They point out Hiccupâs privilege as the chiefâs son, mentioning how he doesnât have to work as hard as them, or how if he was anyone elseâs son, he wouldâve been exiled from Berk by then, but because heâs the chiefâs son he gets to stay no matter how many messes he causes, and that he wouldnât have made it to dragon training without Stoick âpulling some stringsâ. When Hiccup starts to be the star pupil because of the stuff heâs learning from Toothless, they do level off on this and start clamoring to be his friend just like in the original.
Another pretty key difference is that they cut the scene after Test Drive where Hiccup and Toothless are chilling eating fish and the group of Terrible Terrors flies in and Hiccup feeds them. I donât know why they cut this scene because itâs pretty important. Itâs the scene that establishes the Chekhovâs gun of how dragons arenât fireproof on the inside. This is a really important detail for Hiccup to learn because itâs how he defeats the Green Death. It also includes the important line âeverything we know about you guys is wrongâ, which isnât said here, but Hiccup does remark to Astrid during the scene where theyâre reading the dragon training manual something like âmaybe weâre wrong about themâ, which I suppose is pretty similar. But the not fireproof on the inside thing is pretty important. Hiccup does defeat the Green Death in the exact same way, by having Toothless ignite its fire breath first, but there wasnât a scene where Hiccup learned that dragons can be defeated that way, so that knowledge just kinda seems to come out of nowhere.
Also, when Hiccup discovers Toothless shot down in the woods and canât bring himself to kill him, he doesnât say âI did thisâ with regret. This means that Stoick also doesnât say âI did thisâ when he thinks Hiccup is dead, so we donât get that bookend of the father and son being the same in that instance. Also, when Stoick apologizes to Toothless, there is like a whole minute of dramatic tension before Toothless opens his wings to reveal that Hiccup is alive, when in the original he opened his wings right after Stoick apologized. But Iâm glad to say that they did keep the really important shot at the end where Toothless and Hiccup have matching injuries requiring prosthetics. That was a good detail.
This is the only detail of the movie that I actually do think is weird and kind of unnecessary, and thatâs the character of Snotlout. Idk why, but in this version, heâs basically the MCUâs version of Flash Thompson. Like instead of being a physically imposing bully, heâs just kind of a show off. He is bigger than Hiccup, but he doesnât seem âtoughâ. And much like the MCU Flash, he has this weird relationship with his dad?? Like there are a surprising number of scenes where he tries to impress his dad and his dad completely brushes him off and barely acknowledges his existence, and he even tells Snotlout not to speak to him in public. It was giving Flash at the end of Spider-Man: Far From Home when he gets back to New York to find that his butler/chauffeur came to pick him up but not his parents. Like that exact same vibe. It really didnât add anything to the movie except to make you feel sympathy towards Snotlout I guess but it honestly wasnât needed and I thought it was weird. (Full disclosure though, I havenât seen any of the httyd tv shows so I have no idea how Snotloutâs character is expanded in the franchise, so itâs possible that I just donât understand the full extent of his character)
Pretty much everything else about the movie is the same as the animated one, and I do mean pretty much everything. Hiccup is his normal awkward self, Astrid is a Cool Girl, Gobber suggests putting Hiccup in dragon training, Fishlegs is a dragon nerd, the twins pick on each other, Stoick and Hiccupâs Viking helmets are halves of Valkaâs breastplate, all the same dragon species are mentioned, Hiccup is left-handed, and he even eats the bit of fish that Toothless coughs up.
So since the movie is like 90% the original movie, that means that itâs good, or at least mostly good. Thereâs nothing offensive about it, very little added, very little subtracted. Being live action it obviously doesnât have the same visuals or ability to do things that you can only do in animation, but they really do try their best to copy like, all of the important shots. If you love How to Train Your Dragon youâll probably be okay with it since itâs like basically the same movie, but of course itâs hard to beat the magic of the original. But as far as live action remakes go, since it kept pretty much everything, that means that itâs generally very faithful.
Oh but the part at the end where Hiccup decides to leave Toothless behind so he can go to college in Norway to study aviation (even though he already lives in the dragon flying capital of the world) was pretty weird, idk why they did that