Oct 14, 2022
” I chose a half measure, when I should have gone all the way. I’ll never make that mistake again. No more half measures, Walter.“
Mike Ehrmantraut
Loading...
seen from Japan
seen from Germany
seen from Vietnam
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from China
seen from Russia
seen from Malaysia
seen from Nepal
seen from China
seen from Malaysia
seen from China
seen from China
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from Italy
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from India
” I chose a half measure, when I should have gone all the way. I’ll never make that mistake again. No more half measures, Walter.“
Mike Ehrmantraut
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Liberals love helping the poor in theory, but hate the poor in practice.
‘No more half-measures, Walter.’ ‘The time for half-measures and talk is over, Senator’.
-Mike, BREAKING BAD
-Maximus, GLADIATOR
Alot of Employers are cutting hours so they don't have to offer healthcare. Hey wouldn't it be nice if people could shop for Government-Managed/Subsidized healthcare plans online? Boy working a couple part time jobs might not be so bad if everyone paid into a healthcare system in some just way and therefore everyone had access to medical attention.
Future Bank governor Mark Carney warns Europe faces lost decade
In his last speech as Bank of Canada governor Carney warned Europe of the dangers of “half measures” to boost growth.
View Post
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
The era of procrastination, of half-measures, of soothing and baffling expedients, of delays, is coming to a close. In its place we are entering a period of consequences…
Winston Churchill, November 1936
Who Cut Off My `finger`
Overall, I'm not trying to make this, my "more serious blog" a dumping-ground for rants. So, please forgive me this rant and please feel free to skip this post....
I've been using UNIX and similar systems for a long time, now. So, I'm kind of set in my ways in the things I do on systems and the tools I expect to be there. When someone capriciously removes a useful tool, I get a touch upset.
`finger` is one of those useful tools. Sadly, because people have, in the mists of time` misconfigured finger, security folks now like to either simply disable it or remove it altogether. Fine. Whatever: I appreciate that there might be security concerns. However, if you're going to remove a given command, at least make sure you're accomplishing something useful for the penalty you make system users pay in frustration and lost time. If you decide to remove the finger command, then you should probably also make it so I can't get the same, damned information via:
• `id`• `who`• `whoami`• `last`• `getent passwd <USERID>`• (etc.)
If I can run all of those commands, I've still got all the ability to get the data you're trying to hide by removing `finger`. So, what have you accomplished other than to piss me off and make it so I have to get data via other avenues? Seriously: "WTF"?
Why the hell is it that, when someone reads a "security best practice", they go ahead and blindly implement something without bothering to ask the next, logical questions: "does doing this, by itself, achieve my security goal," "is the potential negative impact on system users more than balanced-out by increased system security", "is there a better way to do this and achieve my security goals" and "what goal am I actually acheiving by taking this measure." If you don't ask these questions (and have good, strong answers to each), you probably shouldn't be following these "best practices."
