#fmricourse

And now is saying they're going to publicize the private conversation we had with friends around this "there's this paper that says some of them look like DID I bet one of them is Cambrian" thing and like.

I honestly don't care. I'm betting the paper doesn't exist (though we have emailed Michael asking if there's one from him or Tanya and of course if it DOES exist we'll apologize, sincerely) and either way, we stand by what we've said in private. We don't say things in private that we'd be ashamed of if they were public. In public we do write better, we try to be clearer, we try to be less emotional (or just have Shiloh do the writing because they're a very dispassionate person) but the core of what we say is the same anywhere.

I feel like this is yet another attempt to make us look hypocritical. We're not.

I do want to apologize again for getting the exact statement wrong. What I originally said it was is definitely worse, but I still have major issues with what SAS actually said. I didn't get the actual quote of what SAS said until the other day, just what friends said about what SAS said plus it's been several weeks since then, hence the misunderstanding of what SAS said. I still stand by the assertion she's lying about this paper and that the basically-doxxing assertion that Sunny and Mitsuki are white is either a lie, seeing someone who is Asian but looks mostly white because genetics do that especially if you're mixed, or the person SAS found isn't the same person as Sunny et al because names aren't unique.

It's also not about people saying we have a CDD when we don't. That's not what we care about here and now. It's the assumption of that that's based on this supposed paper that we firmly believe at this point in time was made up. If this paper existed, it would most likely have been linked in the original server SAS was in at some point at bare minimum, and to our knowledge based on what friends who were there have said, it never was.

And like. It's not that we don't care at all if people think we have a CDD, because we do care about that. We don't have a CDD, and we feel people trying to say we do is a way of discrediting us - not because having a CDD is a discrediting thing, but because since we're adamant that we don't, if actually we do we're not a reliable source of information about ourselves. We Crew are firmly of the belief that CDDs are not trauma + plurality, and we think that painting them as such does a disservice to those who do have CDDs, especially including those who have CDDs and are not plural.