#sascourse

It's not a threat, it's a statement about any of us-- you, me, them, them too

Syscourse is an extremely volatile space-- we've seen that in the released chat logs

Don't EVER let your guard down online, especially in discourse spaces, don't let your ego get so big that you think you're above it

It's terrifying what technology is capable of, Google lens specifically has a thing for glasses

Here's some things you can do to protect yourself:

1. When someone calls you a lonely loser on the internet, don't post a picture of you and your partner and a house in the back just to prove you're getting some, it's not worth it (or any other variation of this scenario, don't rise to the bait)

1.5. Don't post like a hundred other photos of yourself on your public discourse account, you make a lot of people very angry, this is a terrible idea

2. Don't post a near identical photo of your business photo to your discourse account, I don't think it's good for business anyways, those aren't people you want as clients

3. Don't put that you're in the process of changing your name to your well-known pen name on your real life Facebook with your current name on it (what are you going to do when that IS your legal name??? How does that work?)

4. Don't have a documentary made about yourself, the producer will likely go on to share more than you want them to (that's what Laura calls it)

5. Don't do multiple amas about yourself that can be referenced years later

6. Don't share pertinent information about when, where, and what position you used to work to win arguments

6.5. Don't put your real location on your profile if you've been legally certified in any way, past or present (this is genuine real advice)

7. Don't claim to be undoxxable

Most importantly

Don't do all of the above and then be like

When someone points out you've shared something dangerous

Like okay, you telling on yourself?

That's not innocent, that's genuinely creepy, dangerous behavior.

If you genuinely cared to help, you'd point out dangerous things in private and you wouldn't use them to dig up private info. And you wouldn't point out things where people who are more malicious could use them to cause actual harm.

We just have a very personal connection to this and have been significantly more harmed by the people against Sunny publicly then we were harmed by Mitsuki repeatedly emotional abusing us in our personal friendship with Mitsuki for over a year. Your feelings are valid but so are mind. Both sides are shit. We don't support Sunny, Mitsuki, Sophie, Dude or Clovers behavior in any of this. They have all been shity assholes and nothing about the intentional triggering and boundary breaking of Mitsukis ex friends Mitsuki abused for over a year will make any of this right. Nothing about proving Mitsuki and Sunny are the same will make any of this right.

Sophie has already blamed Mitsuki's victims for being abused and Dude has done what may be worse abuse to Mitsuki's ex friends than Mitsuki did to them over a longer period of time so even if they didn't hurt you they have done things equally as bad as Sunny and still claim to be saving the people they are abusing. It's very much an I don't care what's being said because of WHO it's coming from and HOW they are choosing to go about it.

SAS? Is that you again? 😋

But for now, I'd just like you to think about one question. With all the things you're accusing us of, please take a moment and really seriously consider:

Is someone like Sophie, who laughs at trauma survivors, repeatedly has used trauma as ragebait, is regularly bigoted in many various ways including racist and intersexist, talks over pwCDDs, champions tulpamancy as this superior tool for plurals of all kinds, and who is growing more and more angry and hate filled the longer she's here on Tumblr... And who doesn't apologize for ANY of this... (or if she has we've never seen it, but it could have happened while we had her blocked)

Is that really someone you want to support? Like look at that list. Compare it to Sophie's history.

Thanks, we do appreciate it. We're taking the brunt of it here but like. We've been prepared for that for a long while. It's absolutely creepy af but like, for us, it's an acceptable risk. We knew this could happen, we're prepared to take the necessary actions we need to.

But. We care because it affects people other than us. People who didn't sign up for this.

But you know what this actually does?

It's making SAS look like a really bad person here. And he's doubling down.

Meanwhile we've... What, said don't break the law? Don't be a creep?