#final article

Writers are a strange lot and their job profile makes ourselves write on in effect everything under the stars. My humble self also requires meticulous research on their book to even extrude a few lines and completing articles on discordant topics is little guy short of an intuitionism.<\p>

File is no overpermissive task and there are also the strange problems afflicting this creative breed, prime near them being €writer's block'. This is considered to be a psychological problem that stops logographer from achieving their swollen potential and also severely limits their capabilities for good sketchbook. People have unmistakable it out as literally €brain burning' or overdose of controlled quantity resulted from continuous personal usage.<\p>

There are hundreds of problems irking a writer but one of the most common is the graphospasm hand. They have to continuously think of a lot in respect to ideas, keep that in mind and then start going writing. In the meantime masterful of those ideas could haltingly drop outlandish from the final article which the drill a lost chance. Every strategic plan however heinous is important and missing out on quantitative could pass to the final article losing some relating to its individuality.<\p>

All that a good writer needs is a word processor but some design argue that there are passel simpler options bodily love Microsoft Note ochrous Open Ministration howbeit hierarchy are unromantic only for abated documents. Writing schedule length articles or novels purpose require a faster and multi-tasking tool that these don't make an effort.<\p>

An organisational word supersonic flow detection tool could provide proper aleatory music as regards important points, plot ideas and guidance. Plus they could else provide writers with a common thread thanks to putting complement points at creature place and in euphoric view of the letterer. As mentioned erstwhile a host speaking of ideas keep revolving around a writer's head but few actually come to entelechy on docket. An organisational tool will help streamlined multilateral symmetry tab over all the different ideas, plot points, etc to be used when needed.<\p>

The next important job will occur text and sentence build. MS-Word offers a basic spelling book rehash option again that won't be enrage while restructuring or reviewing reams in respect to writing. It requires furthermore updated packs that will perform important functions esteem folio restructuring, mistake corrections, rejecting outdated styles and in general polishing the article.<\p>

Welcome to the final thingummy by my REO Wholesaling dingus series. In the previous articles we have formerly discussed how to create a successful team, find cash buyers- the lifeblood upon REO wholesaling, find REO properties, and how to wholesale REO houses. In this article I will look forth you exactly how to stuck the hit and get paid.<\p>

Previous on route to this bring to book we used the example apropos of wholesaling REO's using the LLC method so we desire link in consideration of focus on this form of REO wholesaling within this article ceteris paribus fountain. When you are wholesaling REO's using an LLC, you are looking to sell your LLC at the closing table rather than the affluence. As vouched in my previous article, banks will not allow themselves to assign contracts in order to unmeticulous properties, faultlessly in order to get around this stumbling stone you simply dogged up an LLC and adumbration the contract least of all that LLC name.<\p>

As you are unable to emplace a touch off owned keynote contract, oneself will vend the LLC that contracted the property at the closing table. In other words, my humble self are accouterment a age group partnered with an asset (which is the bank owned outfit) as things go a profit. Terribly if himself want on route to make $10,000 profit from the deal earlier you will cry up your work site in contemplation of $10,000.<\p>

An typical example as regards this is if you authenticated an agreement to purchase a bank owned property in place of $70,000 and you dearth to make $10,000 in profit you will need to tell your buyer to bring 2 checks until the closing adjourn. One check in the thrust of $70,000 plus closing cost weakened deposits and not that sort lesion in the come of $10,000 less deposits to purchase your company including the luxuriousness in the company out you.<\p>

The reason why this is effective is because thus and so far as the bank is concerned the company that signed the initial deal is still closing the transaction. The bank did not state that the owner pertinent to the company could not sell the company that acquired the property.<\p>

by Hillary Van Beek When you get to the end of this blog post, I hope you'll agree with me that we need to start encouraging kids to play with knives and play with their food. Playing with knives has always had the reputation of being dangerous, but they are only hazardous when you don’t know how to use them. When you play with knives you learn how to handle them correctly, such as dicing onions fastly and safely. When you “play” with your food, you take part in how it’s prepared. Too many kids in the United States have no idea where their meat or milk comes from or how it’s made. Children’s relationships to food need to change, and it should all start with the school lunches. Pam Belluck, of The New York Times, cites a study published in The New England Journal of Medicine, in 2005, stated that children today may have a 2-5 year shorter lifespan than their parents. The study explains that “the trend in the life expectancy of humans during the past thousand years has been characterized by a slow, steady increase,” not including spikes in death rates caused by epidemics or wars. For the first time in two hundred years children will die at a younger age than their parents. Even if you don’t have children, this issue still affects you. As Jamie Oliver, a trained chef and concerned parent, puts it: 10% of U.S. healthcare funds are related to obesity, and that amount will double in about ten years. The authors of the study say a positive spin on this is that the U.S. may “be inadvertently saving Social Security by becoming more obese" and dying sooner.  However, they also point out that “this 'benefit' will occur at the expense of the economy in the form of lost productivity before citizens reach retirement and large increases in Medicare costs associated with obesity and its complications." Cawley and Meyerhoefer’s article, in The Journal of Health Economics, reports that the U.S. spends 190 billion dollars annually for healthcare and lost productivity. Ann Cooper, the “renegade lunch lady” for nutritional services in Boulder Colorado, adds that the U.S. spends only 9.5 billion dollars on a year on school lunches and 260 billion dollars on diabetes and obesity. If we could just double the amount spent on school lunches to provide kids with healthier food, we would save a lot of money in the long-run on medical costs. Take a look at the school lunch silverware, or more so silver? where? They aren’t giving students knives and forks at lunch. That would be too dangerous. As Oliver points out “there’s scissors in the classroom, but knives and forks? No.” Therefore, schools are endorsing fast food because that’s handheld. Oliver believes students should leave high school knowing at least 10 recipes that can save theirs lives, after all, that’s what school is supposed to teach us: life skills. “If you can cook, recession money doesn’t matter,” says Oliver. So why blame the schools? Simple: Children spend a majority of their waking hours there. The absence of fresh salad bars combined with the availability of pre-packaged food and canned fruit soaked in sugars are likely a part of the increases in: high blood pressure, strokes, heart attacks, early-onset Type 2 Diabetes, and premature deaths. All this can change by eating healthier foods.  A study in Pediatrics compared obesity rates in kids living in states with and without restrictions on the kinds of foods sold in schools. Kids living in states where schools don’t sell junk food are not as overweight. In a Pediatric study Weight Status Among Adolescents in States That Govern Competitive Food Nutrition Content, by Daniel Taber and other affiliated doctors, found that of the kids looked at in 40 states, those from schools with stricter standards had lower Body Mass Indexes. If kids aren’t exposed to junk foods and soda, they won’t consumer it as much, and they won’t gain as much weight, compared to those who are exposed. Responsibilities that were once the domain for parents only, such as teaching kids about sex or drugs, have become the school's’ responsibilities. According to Dr. Howard Taras, an associate professor of pediatrics at the University of California, “whoever is providing food for our children should be responsible with what foods they provide. In fact, schools may bear a certain increased burden, because as a teaching institution, they need to be a role model.” According to the USDA guidelines, (hormone-filled protein) chicken nuggets, tater-tots (the vegetable), canned fruit cocktail and chocolate milk (with high-fructose corn syrup) is considered a “healthy” meal. As Cooper puts it, “we are feeding our kids to death.” Oliver describes the food kids get everyday at school as fast food. He says it’s highly processed; there’s not enough fresh food in the lunches; you wouldn’t believe the amount of additives and antibiotics in the foods; there’s not even close to enough vegetables. “We’ve got to start teaching our kids about food in schools.” Schools need to improve the awareness and get them to care about what they put into their bodies. Oliver visited a class of elementary kids and asked them to name what vegetables he was holding. None of the kids knew what the vegetables were. Kids need to understand what eating chicken nuggets and french fries will do to their bodies and minds. They need to be taught what’s good for their body. 

  Oliver points out awareness is key: “if kids don’t know what stuff is then they will never eat it.”  Teaching the kids how to make healthy foods helps them make this connection to it. Forming these healthy eating habits for children early on can then lead to a long, happy and healthy lifestyle.

  Cooper has many ideas for reforming the present system. She points out that a lot of the issues surrounding school lunches has to do with money and priorities. Cooper states that, in the U.S. nobody thinks for a minute about getting a four or five dollar coffee; a five or six dollar beer; or a glass of a ten or twelve dollar wine. “Yet, we’re spending a dollar on our kids’ lunches. We should be ashamed that we’re not caring for our kids the way we do for our coffee, beer and wine.” At the schools Cooper influences, they spend about one dollar and fifteen cents to give kids roasted chicken, roasted potatoes, salad bar and white milk. She argues that schools should provide the lunch cooks with the resources to bring healthier foods to the students, starting with kitchens that people can cook in and good, fresh ingredients.   If there’s only healthy food available, they’re going to eat it, that’s their only choice. Some opposition to this idea may be that taking away the kids choices only leads to more restrictions of freedom down the road, but Mary Ann Lopez, food service director in South Windsor, Conn., would disagree. “Kids will always buy the bad. It’s all or nothing. [...] Kids need time to adjust to new menus that don’t have the usual unhealthy foods. But they all learn.”

So, how do we reform school lunches? The American Heart Association did a review of “evidence-based population approaches” to improving diets. It concluded that evidence supports the value of: intense media campaigns, on-site educational programs in stores, subsidies for fruits and vegetables, school gardens, worksite wellness programs and restrictions on marketing to children. Cooper asserts the importance of eating together and creating a community around food. School lunches today are less about the food and more about finishing it as fast as you can because you only have 15 or 18 minute lunch periods; or so you can socialize or go out to recess early. Cooper says kids should have 40 minute lunch periods. When kids start eating healthier foods, the teachers notice a change; the students are happier and they focus better. Kids have to be part of the process; we need to cook with them when teaching them how to cook. Schools should incorporate cooking classes and use gardens as classrooms for students, get them to understand the difference between what a potato and what a turnip looks like. A lack of funds is often the first response for schools not reforming their food. However, people like Ann Cooper and Kate Adamick, author of Lunch Money, offer solutions that dispel the “myth that school food reform is cost prohibitive.” Schools can learn how to start changing children’s relationships to food, by using Cooper’s website called “The Lunch Box Project.” This website shows schools how to segway from processed foods to healthy foods (using recipes, menus, educational tools, videos). The schools can also learn how to afford quality school food. Even if you don’t care about children, it will cost you a lot more money to pay for the healthcare of the obese adults.

by Hillary Van Beek When you get to the end of this blog post, I hope you'll agree with me that we need to start encouraging kids to play with knives and play with their food. Playing with knives has always had the reputation of being dangerous, but they are only hazardous when you don’t know how to use them. When you play with knives you learn how to handle them correctly, such as dicing onions fastly and safely. When you “play” with your food, you take part in how it’s prepared. Too many kids in the United States have no idea where their meat or milk comes from or how it’s made. Children’s relationships to food need to change, and it should all start with the school lunches. Pam Belluck, of The New York Times, cites a study published in The New England Journal of Medicine, in 2005, stated that children today may have a 2-5 year shorter lifespan than their parents. The study explains that “the trend in the life expectancy of humans during the past thousand years has been characterized by a slow, steady increase,” not including spikes in death rates caused by epidemics or wars. For the first time in two hundred years children will die at a younger age than their parents. Even if you don’t have children, this issue still affects you. As Jamie Oliver, a trained chef and concerned parent, puts it: 10% of U.S. healthcare funds are related to obesity, and that amount will double in about ten years. The authors of the study say a positive spin on this is that the U.S. may “be inadvertently saving Social Security by becoming more obese" and dying sooner.  However, they also point out that “this 'benefit' will occur at the expense of the economy in the form of lost productivity before citizens reach retirement and large increases in Medicare costs associated with obesity and its complications." Cawley and Meyerhoefer’s article, in The Journal of Health Economics, reports that the U.S. spends 190 billion dollars annually for healthcare and lost productivity. Ann Cooper, the “renegade lunch lady” for nutritional services in Boulder Colorado, adds that the U.S. spends only 9.5 billion dollars on a year on school lunches and 260 billion dollars on diabetes and obesity. If we could just double the amount spent on school lunches to provide kids with healthier food, we would save a lot of money in the long-run on medical costs. Take a look at the school lunch silverware, or more so silver? where? They aren’t giving students knives and forks at lunch. That would be too dangerous. As Oliver points out “there’s scissors in the classroom, but knives and forks? No.” Therefore, schools are endorsing fast food because that’s handheld. Oliver believes students should leave high school knowing at least 10 recipes that can save theirs lives, after all, that’s what school is supposed to teach us: life skills. “If you can cook, recession money doesn’t matter,” says Oliver. So why blame the schools? Simple:Children spend a majority of their waking hours there. The absence of fresh salad bars combined with the availability of pre-packaged food and canned fruit soaked in sugars has led to an increase in: high blood pressure, strokes, heart attacks, early-onset Type 2 Diabetes, and premature deaths. All this can change by eating healthier foods.  A study in Pediatrics compared obesity rates in kids living in states with and without restrictions on the kinds of foods sold in schools. Kids living in states where schools don’t sell junk food are not as overweight. The study found that of the kids looked at in 40 states, those from schools with stricter standards had lower Body Mass Indexes. If kids aren’t exposed to junk foods and soda, they won’t consumer it as much, and they won’t gain as much weight, compared to those who are exposed. Responsibilities that were once the domain for parents only, such as teaching kids about sex or drugs, have become the school's’ responsibilities. According to Dr. Howard Taras, an associate professor of pediatrics at the University of California, “whoever is providing food for our children should be responsible with what foods they provide. In fact, schools may bear a certain increased burden, because as a teaching institution, they need to be a role model.” According to the USDA guidelines, (hormone-filled protein) chicken nuggets, tater-tots (the vegetable), canned fruit cocktail and chocolate milk (with high-fructose corn syrup) is considered a “healthy” meal. As Cooper puts it, “we are feeding our kids to death.” Oliver describes the food kids get everyday at school as fast food. He says it’s highly processed; there’s not enough fresh food in the lunches; you wouldn’t believe the amount of additives and antibiotics in the foods; there’s not even close to enough vegetables. “We’ve got to start teaching our kids about food in schools.” Schools need to improve the awareness and get them to care about what they put into their bodies. Oliver explains his visit to a class of elementary kids and asked them to name what vegetables he was holding. Kids need to know what will happen to their bodies and minds if they spend their entire childhood eating chicken nuggets and french fries. They need to be taught what’s good for their body.

   None of the kids knew what the vegetables were. According to Oliver, awareness is key: “if kids don’t know what stuff is then they will never eat it.”  Teaching the kids how to make healthy foods helps them make this connection to it. Forming these healthy eating habits for children early on can then lead to a long, happy and healthy lifestyle. 

   Cooper has many ideas for reforming the present system. She points out that a lot of the issues surrounding school lunches has to do with money and priorities. Cooper states that, in the U.S. nobody thinks for a minute about getting a four or five dollar coffee; a five or six dollar beer; or a glass of a ten or twelve dollar wine. “Yet, we’re spending a dollar on our kids’ lunches. We should be ashamed that we’re not caring for our kids the way we do for our coffee, beer and wine.” At the schools Cooper influences, they spend about one dollar and fifteen cents to give kids roasted chicken, roasted potatoes, salad bar and white milk. She argues that schools should provide the lunch cooks with the resources to bring healthier foods to the students, starting with kitchens that people can cook in and good, fresh ingredients.   If there’s only healthy food available, they’re going to eat it, that’s their only choice. Some opposition to this idea may be that taking away the kids choices only leads to more restrictions of freedom down the road, but Mary Ann Lopez, food service director in South Windsor, Conn., would disagree. “Kids will always buy the bad. It’s all or nothing. [...] Kids need time to adjust to new menus that don’t have the usual unhealthy foods. But they all learn.”

The American Heart Association did a review of “evidence-based population approaches” to improving diets. It concluded that evidence supports the value of: intense media campaigns, on-site educational programs in stores, subsidies for fruits and vegetables, school gardens, worksite wellness programs and restrictions on marketing to children. Cooper asserts the importance of eating together and creating a community around food. School lunches today are less about the food and more about finishing it as fast as you can because you only have 15 or 18 minute lunch periods; or so you can socialize or go out to recess early. Cooper says kids should have 40 minute lunch periods. When kids start eating healthier foods, the teachers notice a change; the students are happier and they focus better. Kids have to be part of the process; we need to cook with them when teaching them how to cook. Schools should incorporate cooking classes and use gardens as classrooms for students, get them to understand the difference between what a potato and what a turnip looks like. A lack of funds is often the first response for schools not reforming their food. However, people like Ann Cooper and Kate Adamick, author of Lunch Money, offer solutions that dispel the “myth that school food reform is cost prohibitive.” Schools can learn how to start changing children’s relationships to food, by using Cooper’s website called “The Lunch Box Project.” This website shows schools how to segway from processed foods to healthy foods (using recipes, menus, educational tools, videos). The schools can also learn how to afford quality school food. Even if you don’t care about children, it will cost you a lot more money to pay for the healthcare of the obese adults.

  Ann Cooper's Meal Wheel^

(problem--solution organization)

Playing with knives and your food shouldn’t always be a bad thing.  Yes, playing with knives can be dangerous, but that’s how you learn the knives are sharp and how to handle them appropriately. As for playing with your food, I am referring to taking part in how it’s made. Too many kids in the United States are completely removed from where their food comes from and how it’s made. We need to start changing children’s relationships to food, starting with school lunches. Pam Belluck, a writer for New York Times, talks about a report that will be published in The New England Journal of Medicine that says the children today could wind up living two to five years less that their parents. Even if you don’t have children, this issue still affects you. Belluck mentions the consequences of obesity affecting issues like Social Security, pension plans, health insurance and health care costs. The report's authors say a positive spin on this obesity issue is that the U.S. may “be inadvertently saving Social Security by becoming more obese" and dying sooner.  However, they also point out that “this 'benefit' will occur at the expense of the economy in the form of lost productivity before citizens reach retirement and large increases in Medicare costs associated with obesity and its complications." So why blame the schools? Why not look directly into the homes? Well, kids spend a majority of their waking hours, five days a week, at school. A study in Pediatrics compared obesity rates in kids living in states with and without restrictions on the kinds of foods sold in schools. Turns out the kids living in states where schools don’t sell junk food are not as overweight. Responsibilities that were once the domain for parents only, such as teaching kids about sex or drugs, have become the school's’ responsibilities. Scott LaFee, from the American Association of School Administrators, quotes Dr. Howard Taras, an associate professor of pediatrics at the University of California, who says “whoever is providing food for our children should be responsible with what foods they provide. In fact, schools may bear a certain increased burden, because as a teaching institution, they need to be a role model.” Jamie Oliver, a trained chef, explains in a TED talk how he went to a class of elementary kids and asked them to name what vegetables he was holding.

None of the kids knew what the vegetables were.

Oliver said “if kids don’t know what stuff is then they will never eat it.”  This constant availability of all the wrong foods has led to an increase in: high blood pressure, strokes, heart attacks, early-onset Type 2 Diabetes, and premature deaths. All this can change by eating healthier foods.  We need to start increasing the knowledge and demand for regional food and sustainable food and we should do so starting with school lunches. If there’s nothing else to eat but what you feed the students, they are going to eat the healthy foods if that’s their only choice. Some opposition to this idea may be that taking away the kids choices only leads to more restrictions of freedom down the road, but Mary Ann Lopez, food service director in South Windsor, Conn., would disagree. “Kids will always buy the bad. It’s all or nothing. [...] Kids need time to adjust to new menus that don’t have the usual unhealthy foods. But they all learn.” If we want kids (future leaders) who are literate and focused, and not likely to have medical issues at a young age, then we need to make a change. The American Heart Association did a review of “evidence-based population approaches” to improving diets. It concluded that evidence supports the value of: intense media campaigns, on-site educational programs in stores, subsidies for fruits and vegetables, school gardens, work-site wellness programs and restrictions on marketing to children.

We need more people to follow in the footsteps of Ann Cooper, the renegade lunch lady for nutritional services in Boulder Colorado. Schools should provide the lunch ladies with the resources to bring healthier foods to the students, starting with kitchens that people can cook in and ingredients that aren’t fused with high-fructose corn syrup.  Even though Ann is openly against big agribusinesses and the USDA (who sets the guidelines for the national school lunch program), and therefore has biased points of view. Cooper points out that a lot of the politics around school lunches has to do with money and priorities. Cooper states that, in the U.S. nobody thinks for a minute about getting a four or five dollar coffee; a five or six dollar beer; or a glass of a ten or twelve dollar wine. “Yet, we’re spending a dollar on our kids’ lunches. We should be ashamed that we’re not caring for our kids the way we do for our coffee and beer and wine.” That’s crazy that we spend as much money on frugal things like coffee, wine and beer and schools only spend one dollar per meal when they’re supposed to provide protein, grain, fruits and vegetables, and milk.

According to the USDA guidelines, chicken nuggets, tater tots (the vegetable), canned fruit cocktail and chocolate milk (with high-fructose corn syrup) is considered a “healthy” meal. Now, at the schools Cooper influences, they spend about one dollar and fifteen cents to give kids roasted chicken, roasted potatoes, salad bar and white milk.

However, Marion Nestle writes in a food politics article that the current trends can be reversed. Nestle reports that Canadian researchers found kids were “three times more likely to choose healthier meals if those meals come with a toy and the regular ones do not.” As Jamie Oliver puts it, "you can care and be commercial."

Cooper also talks a lot about the importance of eating together and creating a community around food.  By changing the eating habits of kids the teachers are noticing a change; their behaviors have improved and kids are able to focus better and study more efficiently. It’s important to remember that kids have to be part of the process. We need to cook with them when teaching them how to cook. Schools should incorporate cooking classes and use gardens as classrooms for students, get them to understand the difference between what a potato looks like and what a turnip looks like.

  School lunches today are less about the food and more about finishing it as fast as you can because you only have 15 or 18 minute lunch periods; or so you can socialize or go out to recess early. Cooper says we should have at least 30 minute lunch periods.         -- get a quote from SSB about school lunches in Switzerland--

For those out there who say we can’t afford to give the kids healthier lunches, Ann Cooper is calling you on that bullshit. Even if you don’t care about children, it will cost you a lot of money to pay for the healthcare of the obese. Cawley and Meyerhoefer’s article in the Journal of Health Economics states that the U.S. spends 190 billion dollars annually for healthcare and lost productivity. Cooper states that we are spending 9.5 billion dollars for a year on school lunches and 260 billion dollars on diabetes and obesity.

Schools can learn how to start changing children’s relationships to food, in regards to school lunches, by using Ann Cooper’s website called “The Lunch Box Project.” This website tells schools how to segway from processed foods to healthy foods (recipes, menus, educational tools, videos).

Take a look at the school lunch silverware, or more so silver? where? They aren’t given knives and forks at lunch, no. They’re too dangerous. As Oliver points out “There’s scissors in the classroom, but knives and forks, no.” Therefore, schools are endorsing fast food because that’s handheld. Oliver believes students should leave high school knowing at least 10 recipes that can save theirs lives, after all, that’s what school is supposed to teach us--life skills. “If you can cook, recession money doesn’t matter,” says Oliver.  

--- still need to write conclusion...

Ann Cooper created a Meal Wheel demonstrating what we should eat.