đč Is Tamlin actually the Villain, or Did We All Just Stop Caring About Him When the Author Did?
Letâs talk about Tamlin. No, seriously. Not Feyreâs Tamlin, not the fandomâs Tamlin, not villain arc Tamlin â just Tamlin as a character. Because I think something strange happened to him narrativamente⊠and itâs worth unpacking.
When you reread A Court of Thorns and Roses, something becomes glaringly obvious: Tamlin isnât evil â heâs uninformed. Like, painfully, repeatedly, narratively left out of every important thing that happens. He doesnât know about the curse specifics. He doesnât know what Lucien knows. He doesnât know Feyre can read. He doesnât know how to communicate. He doesnât know how to process his trauma, either. Heâs not malicious â heâs stuck. Emotionally, developmentally, narratively.
And what makes it all more telling is that he starts strong. The first few chapters are trying to make you like him â the wounded fae lord with the tragic past, the slow-burn protector, the mysterious-but-gentle stranger in a beastâs mask. We were going Beauty and the Beast-coded! And then⊠mid-book⊠the tone shiftsđŹ And the shift is NOT subtle: there's no awkward moment of silence here, no vague discomfort there, but rather, suddenly, the writer decides that Tamlin is not a viable option. And we never really get him back.
Let's be clear: Sarah J. Maas does improve her writing as the books go on, and in the beginning, the development of most characters is pretty weak. In my opinion, the first book is written around two major events (meeting the fae and the Under the Mountain arc) that are somewhat awkwardly stitched together. That's probably where a lot of the poorly handled of Tamlin as either a villain or a morally gray character comes from. In fac...
đ§ââïž Ironically, his moment of greatest developmenthis is the one where he stops speaking entirely â the Under the Mountain silence. Heâs paralyzed by fear, guilt, helplessness â and itâs frustrating, yes. But itâs real. Itâs the closest he gets to an arc, and we skip over it. Because the narrative doesnât stay with him. He becomes an obstacle to Feyreâs growth â not a participant in his own.
So is Tamlin the villain? Narratively, sure. Emotionally, heâs a failed promise. A character who couldâve been complex and tragic and redeemable â but instead was dropped halfway through the book, never fully picked back up, and handed to the discourse with a âdo what you will.â
đ And itâs a shame, because the story could have explored something deep and painfully real â the kind of people who, while believing themselves to be good, end up sustaining toxic relationships. But instead, weâre left with someone whoâs simply never told anything, never given any real explanation, and therefore canât logically be expected to act differently.
[Art by Madschofield]















