š¹ Is Tamlin actually the Villain, or Did We All Just Stop Caring About Him When the Author Did?
Letās talk about Tamlin. No, seriously. Not Feyreās Tamlin, not the fandomās Tamlin, not villain arc Tamlin ā just Tamlin as a character. Because I think something strange happened to him narrativamente⦠and itās worth unpacking.
When you reread A Court of Thorns and Roses, something becomes glaringly obvious: Tamlin isnāt evil ā heās uninformed. Like, painfully, repeatedly, narratively left out of every important thing that happens. He doesnāt know about the curse specifics. He doesnāt know what Lucien knows. He doesnāt know Feyre can read. He doesnāt know how to communicate. He doesnāt know how to process his trauma, either. Heās not malicious ā heās stuck. Emotionally, developmentally, narratively.
And what makes it all more telling is that he starts strong. The first few chapters are trying to make you like him ā the wounded fae lord with the tragic past, the slow-burn protector, the mysterious-but-gentle stranger in a beastās mask. We were going Beauty and the Beast-coded! And then⦠mid-book⦠the tone shiftsš¬ And the shift is NOT subtle: there's no awkward moment of silence here, no vague discomfort there, but rather, suddenly, the writer decides that Tamlin is not a viable option. And we never really get him back.
Let's be clear: Sarah J. Maas does improve her writing as the books go on, and in the beginning, the development of most characters is pretty weak. In my opinion, the first book is written around two major events (meeting the fae and the Under the Mountain arc) that are somewhat awkwardly stitched together. That's probably where a lot of the poorly handled of Tamlin as either a villain or a morally gray character comes from. In fac...
š§āāļø Ironically, his moment of greatest developmenthis is the one where he stops speaking entirely ā the Under the Mountain silence. Heās paralyzed by fear, guilt, helplessness ā and itās frustrating, yes. But itās real. Itās the closest he gets to an arc, and we skip over it. Because the narrative doesnāt stay with him. He becomes an obstacle to Feyreās growth ā not a participant in his own.
So is Tamlin the villain? Narratively, sure. Emotionally, heās a failed promise. A character who couldāve been complex and tragic and redeemable ā but instead was dropped halfway through the book, never fully picked back up, and handed to the discourse with a ādo what you will.ā
š And itās a shame, because the story could have explored something deep and painfully real ā the kind of people who, while believing themselves to be good, end up sustaining toxic relationships. But instead, weāre left with someone whoās simply never told anything, never given any real explanation, and therefore canāt logically be expected to act differently.
[Art by Madschofield]









