The second screen cap is from this article which address some basic things people might say which are unintentionally offensive and/or racist.

Here’s a whole bunch more articles on unintentional racism and implicit bias and how “I didn’t know therefore you shouldn’t be offended” is not a valid response. Apologize and change.

• https://everydayfeminism.com/2016/04/unintentional-racist/

• https://pepcleve.org/news-events/unintentional-racism-taking-action-to-reduce-hidden-bias/

• https://uniteforchange.com/en/blog/racism/unconscious-racism/

• https://racismnoway.com.au/about-racism/understanding-racism/unconscious-bias/

My South Asian brother-in-law literally called me just the other week to ask how myself and my sisters turned out “not racist.” My response was that I wouldn’t call myself that. I strive to be not racist, but I am a product of white privilege within a white supremacist, colonialist culture. No matter how hard I try to understand these concepts, I will and I have made mistakes. I’ve learned how to respond and most importantly, I sincerely try.

The trick is to accept the responsibility for the fact that you fucked up, to apologize to the offended party who is absolutely allowed to be offended, and to educate yourself as to what you did wrong. That’s it.

The difficult part of that is accepting the fact that your intentions in life do not matter if you don’t have the ability to self-reflect. If you can’t examine why the effect didn’t match your intentions negatively, you also can’t effectively do so positively.

provided by PBS and produced by California Newsreel

RACE- The Power of an Illusion

The whole thing does a very decent job of explaining the historical basis behind our modern idea of 'race,' as well as educating on the social issues it fosters. Areas of focus include What Is Race?, Sorting People, Human Diversity, Me My Race And I, Where Race Lives, and a Race Timeline that divides between major historical periods and the various social applications of the idea spanning those periods.

I encountered a few contentious arguments however, like

"When the Powhatan princess Pocahontas marries colonist John Rolfe, the union causes a scandal in the British court, not because Rolfe has married an Indian, but because Pocahontas, a princess, has married a commoner. In 17th-century England, social station is more important than physical differences."

While I am certainly not an expert historian on the period, the elimination of any trace racial bias on the part of the British aristocracy--or people, for that matter--sounds pretty extreme, if not completely inaccurate.