domons-ass replied to your post: um no actually hanji is not canonically female in...
basically. there are a lot of other things that people are giving as evidence towards their sex/gender, but none of those things even really make sense
yep plus it does not even matter what ""evidence"" there is for their gender because until they are explicitly stated by the author to identify as female, do not gender them,,,,
plus boobs =/= female and i have seen that argument many a time like,,, first of all how a person dresses does not equal their gender identity so ??? gosh just because hanji doesn't fit into the tiny narrow idea of what people think of as agender doesn't make them any less agender.
aaand like. no matter what """evidence""" for them being cis like it is pretty much always better to read a character with ambiguous gender as not cis because there is so little trans* representation like do yall really need another cis person why are you fighting so hard to make this person with no stated gender cis,,,,,, nnnnh