The Land of Froud - art by Brian Froud (1976)
seen from Canada
seen from Russia
seen from China

seen from Malaysia
seen from Chile
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Israel
seen from Sweden

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Türkiye
seen from China

seen from Greece
seen from South Korea

seen from United States
seen from China
seen from Germany
seen from Pakistan
The Land of Froud - art by Brian Froud (1976)

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
The missing link! Iāve found the missing link! Iāve been fascinated by David Larkinās editorial work in the ā70s pretty much since I realized that he was behind the majority of a white-covered art books that hit shelves during that time, but it is hard to find a definitive list of books that he produced ā āeditorā isnāt reliably credited in the usual databases, and in the case of a book like Gnomes, with clear author and illustrator credit, no one is going to flag that as a āDavid Larkinā book. I still donāt have a full accounting of his books, but I am pretty sure the art series started with Magritte, in 1972. From there, through 1975, he produced a number of books featuring 19th and turn of the century artists like Arthur Rackham, the Pre-Raphaelites and Carl Larsson. In 1976, Gnomes came out, and Larkinās books suddenly showcased contemporary artists like Alan Lee, Sulamith Wülfing and even Salvador Dali, who was still alive at the time, and featured an increasing focus on fantasy. Lacking any evidence, Iāve had to just accept that Gnomes was a āEureka!ā moment for Larkin, but Iāve always suspected there was a pivot point.
I was right! Itās Once Upon a Time (1976), a curiously scarce (but inexpensive) book subtitled āSome Contemporary Illustrators of Fantasy.ā That subtitle gives the distinct impression of a concept not entirely fleshed out, of experimentation. The selection of work inside follows suit ā itās all good stuff, but seems a bit of a grab-bag. It reminds me a bit of the way Stewart Cowley forged narrative art books like the Terran Trade Authority (1978-1979) series out of a bunch of stuff laying about the art agency. Perhaps with good reason, as this book is an extension of Larkinās work in organizing the UKās Association of Illustrators. Thereās no overarching narrative (like we would soon see in Gnomes) but much of the featured work was previously unpublished, making it feel like a collection of portfolios in a way.
Some killer artist in here, as you might imagine. The first plate is a four-page fold-out of Pauline Ellisonās covers for the Earthsea trilogy. Brian Froud gets a lot of room (heād get a whole book from Larkin a few years later, in addition to Faeries). Ian Miller and Alan Lee also stand out ā I donāt think any of their pieces in here have been recollected since. There are other artists that are great that I am not too familiar with ā Chris McEwan and Wayne Anderson in particular. But it is the presence of Froud, Lee and Miller who really indicate how Larkin understood (and influenced) the future of fantasy art.
Tony Meeuwissen, painting for the story 'The Witch's Hat' by Irwin Dermer, ''Once Upon A Time'' ed. by David Larkin, 1976
Book 319
The Fantastic Kingdom: A Collection of Illustrations from the Golden Days of Storytelling
David Larkin, ed.
Ballantine Books 1975
While this thin collection of illustrations from classic books leans heavily on the major names (Rackham, Dulac, Parrish, Nielsen), it also includes wonderful selections from artists like Jessie Wilcox Smith, Charles Robinson, William Heath Robinson, Jean de Bosschere, Paul Bransom, Harry Clarke, T. Mackenzie and others. And the images are satisfyingly large.
The world did Kay Nielsen dirty. He was of the Golden Age, but with Dulac was part of a slightly younger cohort than Rackham and the old guard. By far, the defining feature of his work is an embrace of detailed pattern to a degree that has perhaps never been rivaled. The level of detail in his work is beyond sumptuous and emphasized by a certain flattening of his compositions, which often remind me of sets for a stage play. Individual elements of his illustrations are extremely precise and orderly, but often turn chaotic as the page fills ā all that potential energy bounces my eyes around ceaselessly.
This is Kay Nielsen (1975), one of David Larkinās series of books focusing on Golden Age artists, a prime reason, I think, why he remains in the public imagination. Iād be willing to bet that Nielsenās figures ā pale, oddly proportioned, somewhat alien-looking and featuring a propensity for odd clothing choices, particularly hats ā inspired Michael Moorcockās Melniboneans. Or, at the very least, inspired the artists who illustrated them.
Late in life, he worked for Disney and receives much of the credit for the Night on Bald Mountain sequence of Fantasia, but also did production work for other films, including Sleeping Beauty (once you know this, I think, itās impossible to not see his hand in Maleficent). Apparently his production work underpins sequences in The Little Mermaid and Frozen, produced 32 years and 56 years after his death. I find this supremely frustrating, considering Disney let him go in 1941 for being too dark; he struggled to find commissions after that and lived in relative poverty for the last decade and a half of his life. Rotten.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Arthur Rackham might be the epitome of the Golden Age illustrators for many folks, but I feel that Edmond Dulac had the most success producing work for more conventional literature. Rackham, Ford and so on were illustrators of fairy stories; one of Dulacās first major commissions was to illustrate Jane Eyre and the other Bronte novels. He did illustrated fairy tales, including one full volume of Hans Christian Anderson, but also tackled Shakespeare, The Arabian Nights and The Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam. That last, a portfolio of 20 images, is probably his best-known work (though the dude did design stamps and currency too, that doesnāt seem like the same sort of recognizability, but does point to the scope of his mainstream success).
This is the David Larkin-edited Dulac (1975) and it focuses mostly on his more fantastic work. He shares something of Rackhamās murky textures and rich colors, but where Rackham taps some nostalgic notion of Britainās rural life, Dulac is decidedly Orientalist in his designs and ornamentation. Most Golden Age illustrators seem keen to fill space, but Dulac is happy to let it stay empty, to show of its spotty tones. The alchemist on the cover is a good example of that. His monsters, what few there are, are reasonable-looking for the most part. No octopus tentacle beards here.
Despite that, Dulac has some clear lines of descent. Charles Vess is an obvious exponent as is, I think, Alan Lee. Ellie Jo Livingston counts him as a big influence as well. Sheās probably painting more than enough monsters to make up for Dulacās relative lack of them!
Seems strange that Iāve not written about any of the artists associated with the Golden Age of Illustration, considering how foundational they are to our concept of fantasy as a genre (which didnāt really exist, per se, until the ā70s). The period began around 1890, fueled by new printing techniques and a demand for beautiful storybooks to be given as Christmas gifts, and ended with the Great War (this is really a commercial market designation, as most of the illustrators continuing to produce work well after the war).
The artist probably most associated with the Golden Age is assuredly Arthur Rackham. And heās great! David Larkinās Arthur Rackham (1975) is an excellent overview of the artistās entire body of work (which getās increasingly realistic over time). His style of figure poses, the rich textures of his watercolor backgrounds and his whimsy all reverberate in the work of other artists of the period. He had a great talent for depicting faeries and giants in a believable rural setting. The image of the fairy ring is probably one of his most famous, but the two-headed Welsh giant is a personal fave. He wasnāt really one for monsters ā odd looking people, sure, animals, sure, combinations of the two, sure, but aside of that excellent Chimera and the occasional dragon, I canāt really think of any other Rackham beasties.
Heās an obvious influence on Tony DiTerlizziās work ā some of TDās later Planescape illustrations really experiment in the deep, textured watercolors of Rackhamās landscapes. I think folks would say heās an influence on Charles Vess, too, and I donāt disagree, really, but I think Nielsen and Dulac more strongly inform his work.
Oh, I will say, I find most of Rackhamās children extremely creepy and doll-like. They look like they bite. Maybe theyāre the monsters!
The third and final installment in David Larkinās series fantasy field guides after Gnomes and Faeries is Giants (1979), which features art from Julek Heller, Carolyn Scrace and Juan Wijngaard. Larkin gets credit here for ādevisingā the book, while Sarah Teale gets credit for the text. I am not sure how that breaks down in practice, but it sure feels like Larkin had the most to do with the direction of this book.
Faeries is really the solid gold hit of the series, endlessly fascinating, extremely varied. Gnomes feels expressly designed to capitalize on eddies of folkiness in 70s pop culture. Compared to them, Giants feels a bit one note and a bit in search of a vibe. When it boils down, it is essentially a book about very large people. It often plays to that core truth effectively, but it never feels so singular as the other two books, if that makes sense.
Partly that might just be that there are too many folks involved. Where Gnomes is one artistic vision and Faeries and elegant duet, the trio here never quite finds its harmonies. All three deliver stellar work, but rarely does that work collaborate with its neighbors in the way Lee and Froud play off each other. Giants are hard, too, because without markers for scale, they just look like people doing stuff, but if every painting has markers for scale, it gets repetitive. Both of these pitfalls are on view here. One canāt help but wonder why they didnāt do dragons instead.
Which isnāt to say this book isnāt worth getting! It totally is. Put it right on the shelf with the other two, your other Alan Lee books and your copies of the Time Life Enchanted World series. It is certainly a key part of the fantasy art renaissance of the 70s and 80s. Sure, it doesnāt measure up to Faeries. But where else are you going to find a whole book on Giants? They just donāt make āem like this any more. (OK, not entirely true ā Johan Egerkrans is bringing this sort of thing back with his books Vaesen, Norse Gods and The Undead ā thank goodness!).