I& found a post policing entities into not using the term cisharmful and it's just odd , this community supports freedom of expression , alternatives are always welcomed , but so what if the coiner turned out to be pro abuse ? Using their term doesn't mean supporting their actions , it's not even an original structure , anyone else could've came up with that concept as it's literally " cis + word " , the coiner that I& wasn't even aware of their existence till that post doesn't own the word , such terms that are meant to be used shouldn't be tied to one entity and restricted because of their actions , best way to go about it is not aassociat the word with them , actions matter more than labels , if someone is calling themself cisharmful instead of any other variants like sourceharmful and isn't displaying any signs of supporting noncon harm then mind your business , and when they do display support of such then focus on that , not whatever terms they go by .