This is going to be a long ask, so I apologize in advance, but I want to address the history of Chinese face veils, specifically in relation to Hanfu, and how the discussion within the princessfur community has been flattened into an overly simplistic âracist vs. not racistâ binary. Beau, in particular, has repeatedly accused multiple people of racism over this topic, including individuals who are themselves Chinese, including myself.
The issue is that Beauâs argument relies on historically inaccurate framing and a rigid âthis is acceptable, that is notâ approach, without any real engagement with cultural overlap, historical exchange, or how the meaning and use of clothing changes over thousands of years. China has an extremely long and well documented fashion history, so this is not intended to be a comprehensive breakdown, just necessary context.
The most well known historical Chinese veil is the Mili, a full-body veil used to preserve a womanâs modesty. Its origins are tied to Rong and Yi cultures, and historical records often describe it as originating from âbarbarianâ or non-Han influences rather than being indigenous to Han Chinese culture.
During the Sui dynasty, societal expectations shifted, and women were no longer required to fully veil their bodies. As a result, the Mili evolved into the Weimao, a veiled hat designed to obscure the face. The Weimao itself has roots in Hufu, which was explicitly described as foreign or âbarbarianâ clothing. These garments were incorporated into Chinese fashion largely to enforce ideals of modesty, reflecting long standing patterns of misogyny and xenophobia that, like many cultures, exist within Chinese history.
What Beauâs characters are depicted wearing is closer to Hanfu, which is broadly considered traditional Chinese clothing. Hanfu has gone through many changes across centuries, but itâs important to focus on its modern usage. The sheer face veils Beau refers to are known as Miansha, lightweight veils sometimes adorned with beads. These are commonly seen in C-dramas, cosplay, photoshoots, and modern fashion contexts. C-drama costuming, in particular, tends to lean closer to stylized historical fantasy than strict historical accuracy.
When Beau says âthis is from my culture,â that statement is not inherently incorrect. However, presenting face veils as anything more than a fashion choice in a modern context is misleading. While Beau is free to dress their characters in Chinese inspired clothing that suits their aesthetic, it is disingenuous to ignore the fact that much of what we see in C-dramas and fantasy Hanfu is designed for visual appeal and mass consumption, not historical realism.
Additionally, face veils have long been used in orientalist and odalisque imagery, and China is not immune from these portrayals. Historically, there is also a well documented pattern of exploitation and abuse of women and children, including concubinage. Something can still be fetishistic or harmful even if it originates within a culture. Many long-time members of the princessfur community will remember repeated stories romanticizing emperors and favored concubines, which echoes these dynamics.
All of the historical information referenced here comes from Wikipedia and its cited sources, which are publicly accessible and verifiable. Tumblr does have blogs discussing Hanfu and its history, but many fail to provide proper citations, which makes them unreliable as historical references.
Thank you for the much needed context, although Wikipedia is considered unreliable to some as a source, I appreciate the education nonetheless.













