Getting married is a rigged game
In eighteenth-century tradition, acceptable behavior for women was encapsulated by the parameters of marriage since that appeared to be their only possible state. Although "there was no consensus between the state, church, and popular opinion as to how marriage should be defined," (Evans 47)marriage still was a socially ingrained institution which seemed almost a natural state for women, and it was opposed by their fall into disgrace and even prostitution. There was no middle ground for them. Adequate behavior in those terms could be summarized as turning women from individual agents into objects property of their husbands. As objects, they would have to be beautiful ornaments that did not cause trouble. They were supposed to be submissive, quiet, and obedient. If a subjectivity was given to them, it would have been one of the upper servants, but not because of their qualities, but of their obligations as wives.
One could think of works that offer a different representation of women to portray the possibilities that they could have if a fairer ground was offered to them in society such as The Female Quixote and The History of Miss Betsy Thoughtless. Nevertheless, Moll Flanders is not one of those novels. When analyzing Daniel Defoe's novel, we need to consider that society does not judge women and men by the same standards. In this work, women need to be reeducated through (bad) experiences and redeem themselves to fit the expectations society had and demanded of them. This reeducation causes them to change and renounce the person they were in order to still be part of society.
But let us start from the beginning of Moll Flanders' fall: falling for the promise of the older brother of the house in which she was a servant. The narration establishes their relationship with the eager interest he first showed on her: "The eldest, a gay Gentleman that knew the Town as well as the Country (...) he began with that unhappy Snare to all Women, taking notice upon all Occasions how pretty I was, as he call'd it: how agreeable, how well Carriaged, and the like; and this he contriv'd so subtilly, as if he had known as well, how to catch a Woman in his Net." (Defoe 57) This quote lets us see how experienced he is in comparison to her and how, in retrospect, Moll recognizes her own naivety. The fact that he is the eldest is important since "[i]n the early eighteenth century, the arrangements by which the English aristocracy and gentry commonly provided for their families conformed to a standard pattern, the strict settlement, in which the essential questions were settled at the marriage of the eldest son."(Habakkuk 1) Therefore, with this knowledge, their relationship is doomed since she has nothing to offer for a good arrangement to be made out of their marriage. Nevertheless, Moll's perspective is biased from her own perception of herself which does not consider her social and economic status: "I had the Advantages of my Ladies, tho' they were my Superiors; but they were all the Gifts of Nature, and which all their Fortunes could not furnish. First, I was apparently Handsomer than any of them. Secondly, I was better shap'd, and Thirdly, I sung better." (Defoe 56) Moll's vanity surpassed her own vision of the world, and makes her "to be so elevated, that [she] scarce knew the Ground [she] stood on." (62) Since she immediately believes that this education and natural gifts were enough for her to make an arrangement for herself. By giving up on the eldest brother's propositions, she loses her "virtue" and "modesty" (68). I argue that this loss is based on mismanagement of her "conduct".
Jones argues that "the concern of all eighteenth-century 'conduct' manuals for women is how women might create themselves as objects of male desire, but in terms which will contain the desire within the publicly sanctioned form of marriage." (14) That is, even if the marriage between them was impossible considering their economic and social status, Moll ignored that her conduct was based on looking for a sanctioned marriage that is public and creates obligations towards her from him, and not a promise in exchange of her most valuable asset: her virtue.
One could argue that Moll did not have these ideas as clearly ingrained in her mind as other women for her upbringing, but if she received a similar education to the ladies, this must have been named since "(...) [y]oung women are taught 'natural' femininity in terms of negation and repression —silence, submission, 'abstinence or continence,'—" (15) this gives them the power of negotiation during courtship, but this power is so susceptible to seduction, rape, lies and more that their power seems almost an illusion. Their roles in this process seem to remain passive and compliant to male desire.
The objectification and limitation of female sexuality play into the idea of women being objects of exchange "within a mercantilist discourse which conflates economic self-interest and moral rectitude." (59) One can see this in the change of circumstances that make Moll marry the younger brother. For the eldest son, Moll was an object that was used and then discarded, and for the younger son, Moll was a new object ready to be used, even if he was gentler and kinder to her.
Jones argues that "public interest is privileged over individual desire" (15) which would justify the decision of the eldest brother and Moll to hide their relationship after it finished: to make it public would have affected a public interest such as his role in English society as a gentleman. Moll goes from being a respectable working woman to a whore. The active use of her sexuality contravened the notion of "conduct" and therefore, she was no longer an embodiment of moral value.
It may seem that sexuality, if it is not within the limits of marriage, is a threat to society since it could fall into very different situations: prostitution, rape, seduction, adultering, ill relationships, etc. Nevertheless, women are the only ones punished for these passions that lead to sex. Men maintain their reputations and can go and marry someone else, women cannot. Therefore, women are not only tied by their inevitable destiny as someone's wife but are also at risk at every moment until they are married. This process is rigged for women in vulnerable situations like Moll. They have no one to help them negotiate their value and their only respectable option for life becomes an impossible goal.
Ellis, Lorna. “Reacting to Romance and Building the Bildungsroman,” Appearing to Diminish, Bucknell University Press, 1999, pp. 70-87.
Evans, Tanya. "Unfortunate Objects". Courtship, Sex, and Marriage in Eighteenth-Century Popular Literature.Palgrave Macmillan, London, 2005, p. 48.
Defoe, Daniel. Moll Flanders. Penguin Classics, 1989.
Habakkuk, H. J. "Marriage Settlements in the Eighteenth Century." Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, vol. 32, 1950, pp. 15-30.
Jones, Vivien, "Conduct" Women in the Eighteenth Century. Constructions of femininity. Routledge London and New York, 1990, pp. 14-22
Jones, Vivien, "Sexuality" Women in the Eighteenth Century. Constructions of femininity. Routledge London and New York, 1990, pp. 57-61.









