Graphical Craft As Extensions of Thought, Not Authors of it.
Throughout history, every era has faced the same question: does the tool define the artist?
Michelangelo did not invent marble, nor did he merely carve it. He made choicesβabout form, proportion, and expressionβthat the stone itself could not dictate. The work we admire is the product of his decisions, not of the physical labor or the chisel alone.
Rembrandt did not depend on the brush to decide where shadow should fall. The brush was an instrument for his thinking, a conduit for his perception. The genius lies in the judgment, the intentionality, and the responsibility for the effect of each stroke.
Yet Van Goghβs bold impasto or Warholβs mechanical silkscreens are not legitimized by the hand alone β they are legitimized by decisions and intentionality. Effort is a byproduct; thought is the core.
Just as artists of every era expanded their toolsets without losing their essence, designers today expand theirs β not to escape labor, but to extend thinking.
The lesson is clear: history proves it. The hand does not make the artist. The mind does.
