Catfordâs translation shifts VS language learningÂ
Iâm not going to grace your eyes with some fancy definitions of translation theories. Believe me, the fancier/smarter something sounds, the worse it is to understand. Instead, Iâll try to present a brief and easy-to-comprehend explanation and examples.Â
I majored in translation, and while I thoroughly donât enjoy it, I find some strategies and theories extremely useful in language learning.Â
Check out this post to learn more about the application of translation theories in language learning.Â
John Catfordâs TRANSLATION SHIFTS.Â
 First things first, what are shifts?Â
: to exchange for or replace by another: change (Merriam-Webster)
In translation, they refer to changes/shifts in language form.Â
There two types of shifts:
Simply put, the target language doesnât have a corresponding word but a grammatical construction. We replace grammatical constructions with words or vice versa.
Halliday states that language is realized at 4 different levels: lexis, phonology, graphology, and grammar. Iâm not sure if graphology can influence a language learning process, but lexis, grammar, and phonology surely can. I mean, graphology (the way we write) can definitely slow down the whole process (looking at you Japanese! You and your kanji⊠ugh). Studying phonology (comparing sounds in different languages), on the other hand, can help you work on your accent (studying phonetics would be even better in this case).
To put things into perspective, letâs look at some examples:
Iâm working  VS  Teraz pracujÄ Â
Present Continuous indicates that the action is happening NOW. We donât need to add the word now because the tense alone is enough.Â
In Polish, you must add the word TERAZ (now) to show that the action is happening now. The verb alone could indicate Present Simple as well.Â
We changed the PRESENT CONTINUOUS to TERAZ. GRAMMAR -> LEXISÂ
My car has been repaired VS Moje auto zostaĆo naprawione
Here, we have the Present Perfect Tense in its passive form and âzostaĆo + adjective (naprawione),â which indicates passive voice in Polish. GRAMMAR -> LEXISÂ
which consist of changes in:
It refers to changes in word order. Polish is a very flexible language. We can start sentences with adjectives, verbs, nouns, or even adverbs. In English, unless we need to emphasize something, we start sentences with nouns. Â
Adjectives change to verbs, or nouns to verbs, etc.
Iâm thirsty (adjective) VS ChcÄ (verb) mi siÄ piÄ (verb)
I want (verb) a dog VS Inu ga hoshi (adjective)
Unit (sentences, clauses, phrases, words, morphemes)
Some languages are wordy (Polish is) and some are rather concise and flexible when it comes to word-formation. Japanese is a perfect example here.Â
Ikigai (single word) VS a reason for being (phrase)
Mono no aware(phrase) VS a whole description because we canât even put the meaning into one sentence
Nii-chan (word) VS older brother (phrase)
It refers to grammatical constructions that are present in both languages but are used differently. In Japanese, plural nouns are technically non-existent. The context will tell you if we talk about one thing or many things. However, we can create plural nouns when we talk about animate objects. The concept of plural nouns does exist but is used differently in Japanese and English.Â
Bonnie âtachi VS Bonnie and friends/and others
In Japanese, we used a suffix indicating that there is more than one person, but in English, we used an extra plural word to show it.Â
 So, how this knowledge can help you?
It will help you ask better questions in class.
Understanding how your native language works will speed up your learning process tremendously.
If comparing languages is your favorite language learning method, Catfordâs translation shifts can give an idea where to start and what to notice.
If youâre a teacher, it can help you explain some grammatical phenomena.
If you help others learn your native language, youâll be able to explain grammatical issues, or at least give examples.
Youâll speed up your translation abilities.
Halliday, M.A.K. 1961. Categories of the theory of grammar.