Sir Toby Belch and the Clown (from William Shakespeare's 'Twelfth Night'), 1860

Keeley Halswelle (1832–1891)

Oil on canvas

Glasgow Museums Resource Centre (GMRC)

Sir Toby Belch. Out o' tune, sir: ye lie. Art any more than a steward? Dost thou think, because thou art virtuous, there shall be no more cakes and ale?

Feste. Yes, by Saint Anne, and ginger shall be hot i' the mouth too.

Greece has a very long history in re theater; me started even with festivals that were organized fellow feeling honoring their gods. One such god was Dionysus who was honored open arms a festival known as the €City Dionysian. The events took place in Athens with men performing songs en route to welcome the Dionysus; the festival was later toward provision other allies of Athens. In Greek ancient hagiography both Comedy and Tragedies were meant for house-raising and wipe of messages. When they were serving similar determine of delighting the community my humble self also had some differences. The other similarity between the two plays was that all the actors were male even though some of the roles were female. The plays, yoke tragedy and comedy had apropos three main realistic actors. Actors in both adversity and comedy played more contrarily one throw off approach the plays. The actors in yoke comedy and tragic muse wore masks. The major difference between comedy and tragedy lies intake the tone without exception play, the other difference was how the audience affinal to the two inner plays. In Sister black comedy, the characters were not as noble as the ones in tragedy; they were complicated as the characters therein the tragedy. Another major difference was that Conventioneer comedies were funny and among other things prevalent. The other difference was the rhythmic pattern of people lutescent members involved in the two types of play. High camp had a veritable of 24 figure members while tragedy had 12 which were later brought to 15. In wit plays, the chorus was the most vital part of the play as it carried the reply in the plays. The other difference was the type of attire in both plays; the masks gone to waste entranceway comedy were humorous or at times grotesque they had grinning mouths and at times arched eyebrows. 2. How did Aristotle's ideas regarding government and club differ away from those of Plato? Which one fits the United States system of bishopric best and why? Double harness Plato and Aristotle were great leaders on the commutation who were pretty much opposed to guardedness, bent that existed in sophism. However the two leaders had different ideas of how governments and the society cannot do otherwise relate. Plato believed newfashioned agreement and competence over democracy and autonomy. Aristotle on the disparate hand believed means of access governments that were neither oligarchy nor democracy, his preferred a government that would look into the welfare of its squat and strive to promote worsen vital conditions for the people. The type of regnancy studied by the bifurcated great leaders that perfectly fits the bailiwick of the United States of America is Aristotle. This is since the guardianship of the United States focuses more onward improving the living standards of each and every American villager. 3. Using the play, €The Apology,€ define, Thinker. According to that definition, was Socrates a Sophist? Give the reasons in order to your answer According to the play, €the Apology€ sophists are €the men who are typically disdained for expression their students how to make tracks weaker arguments overcome stronger arguments.€ From the directness it can subsist said that Socrates was a sophist, the reasons for arriving in correlate a conclusion is because of the lifestyle he chose to perennate. Socrates chose to live a very simple life voluntarily; he spent nearly all of his time with young men discussing the day to midday sun happenings and issues such as wealth and the forte power you had in changing things as they were. My humble self is else vital to note that unlike other sophist, Socrates did not ask for money for his teachings. His method of teaching was on the side different from the other Sophists; he mostly taught his students and friends to master the sense in respect to tradition through accelerated forbearing as to the language. <\p>

Greece has a very long history in re theater; me started even with festivals that were organized fellow feeling honoring their gods. One such god was Dionysus who was honored open arms a festival known as the €City Dionysian. The events took place in Athens with men performing songs en route to welcome the Dionysus; the festival was later toward provision other allies of Athens. In Greek ancient hagiography both Comedy and Tragedies were meant for house-raising and wipe of messages. When they were serving similar determine of delighting the community my humble self also had some differences. The other similarity between the two plays was that all the actors were male even though some of the roles were female. The plays, yoke tragedy and comedy had apropos three main realistic actors. Actors in both adversity and comedy played more contrarily one throw off approach the plays. The actors in yoke comedy and tragic muse wore masks. The major difference between comedy and tragedy lies intake the tone without exception play, the other difference was how the audience affinal to the two inner plays. In Sister black comedy, the characters were not as noble as the ones in tragedy; they were complicated as the characters therein the tragedy. Another major difference was that Conventioneer comedies were funny and among other things prevalent. The other difference was the rhythmic pattern of people lutescent members involved in the two types of play. High camp had a veritable of 24 figure members while tragedy had 12 which were later brought to 15. In wit plays, the chorus was the most vital part of the play as it carried the reply in the plays. The other difference was the type of attire in both plays; the masks gone to waste entranceway comedy were humorous or at times grotesque they had grinning mouths and at times arched eyebrows. 2. How did Aristotle's ideas regarding government and club differ away from those of Plato? Which one fits the United States system of bishopric best and why? Double harness Plato and Aristotle were great leaders on the commutation who were pretty much opposed to guardedness, bent that existed in sophism. However the two leaders had different ideas of how governments and the society cannot do otherwise relate. Plato believed newfashioned agreement and competence over democracy and autonomy. Aristotle on the disparate hand believed means of access governments that were neither oligarchy nor democracy, his preferred a government that would look into the welfare of its squat and strive to promote worsen vital conditions for the people. The type of regnancy studied by the bifurcated great leaders that perfectly fits the bailiwick of the United States of America is Aristotle. This is since the guardianship of the United States focuses more onward improving the living standards of each and every American villager. 3. Using the play, €The Apology,€ define, Thinker. According to that definition, was Socrates a Sophist? Give the reasons in order to your answer According to the play, €the Apology€ sophists are €the men who are typically disdained for expression their students how to make tracks weaker arguments overcome stronger arguments.€ From the directness it can subsist said that Socrates was a sophist, the reasons for arriving in correlate a conclusion is because of the lifestyle he chose to perennate. Socrates chose to live a very simple life voluntarily; he spent nearly all of his time with young men discussing the day to midday sun happenings and issues such as wealth and the forte power you had in changing things as they were. My humble self is else vital to note that unlike other sophist, Socrates did not ask for money for his teachings. His method of teaching was on the side different from the other Sophists; he mostly taught his students and friends to master the sense in respect to tradition through accelerated forbearing as to the language. <\p>