the maskās origin isnāt stated āyouāre not telling me thatās vibranium too?ā āNah Iām just feelin itā but the whole scene is themed around Black people reclaiming artifacts from white colonizers, Erik āculturally appropriatingā seems like a derailment to me
i was wrong about the mask being wakandan--itās actually stated in the movie that itās igbo, so thatās on me. however, it does seem like a derailment to argue that he was appropriating the mask and would probably throw it away later. we donāt know what he did with it later. yes, he threw his colleagues under the bus, but they were not important to him. (obviously that makes him a dick but thatās not the POINT.) whatās important to him is CULTURE, and reclamation. he makes it very clear that he feels robbed of his birthright, both the wakandan throne, as well as a feeling of belonging. he felt isolated and robbed because of the racist, imperialist society that he grew up in. SO arguably the mask would mean more to him than klaue because it symbolized him taking back something that he feels was stolen from him.Ā
however, the fact that the mask is igbo also has a lot of importance and symbolism that makes the scene more meaningful. @littleirishaniā sent me a really great response that iām gonna quote here:Ā
āI looked into where Killmongerās mask is from and itās actually from the Igbo people (real people) and itās used to show that slavery is continuing. It strengthens his words in the museum about stealing and slavery because the Igbo people were a part of the slave trade. Theyāre known for rebelling one day on a ship, and after they killed the captain they realized they couldnāt go back home, so they committed suicide. (Which is similar to Killmongerās last statement in the movie.)
I think that they used something real in that scene instead of making up a Wakandan artifact to make it more... believable? Like these are things that you would actually see in a museum, and these are actual issues that are extremely important, so maybe they wanted to be closer to home.āĀ
obviously i think cooglerās intention was to show him as an antagonist, but when you look at him from a writing/archetype perspective, heās just NOT aĀ āsuper villainā like green goblin or riddler, that are campy and not made to be taken seriously. heās made to be taken VERY seriously and i would argue that heās written as a byronic heroĀ because he displays all of the following characteristics:
byronic heroes arenāt always theĀ āgood guysā. byronic heroes can do things that are deeply morally wrong. all i was trying to say, and all that i will continue to say, is that calling him aĀ āsuper villainā seems inappropriate because the real-life tragedies that inspired his characterās creation are meant to be taken seriously.Ā