How not to act when you have a bad take on the internet
Once upon a time, a person on X had a hideously bad take. They thought Bucky Barnes was a bad person who signed up to the army in WW2 because he liked killing and preseumbly worked for HYDRA willingly as well.
This is callled fart-sniffing. A person who has become so conceited and self-absorbed they think thier ideas are superior to everyone else's and contrary to what the evidence says.
Anyway when people questioned their bad take which proves the movies went over their head, this user decided to double down. Instead of admitting they might be wrong or reconsidering in light of the evidence they decided to attack everyone who didn't agree.
....and proclaim that obviously everyone who *doesn't* think Bucky is a bad person who just does bad stuff because he likes killing is just stupid and can't tolerate criticism of Bucky.
Clearly they think he's perfect and has no flaws. (Also they llike to throw in long words llke "infantilize" without context because because it they think it makes them sound smart.)
Not that their take is contradicted by like.... everything we are shown across 5 movies.
One of their friends stumbled across this thing called *evidence which didn't support their position*. What oh what to do about this insurmountable obstacle?
Easy: reinterpret it to fit your opinion. Stan Lee said Bucky was one of the good guys because he *used* to be a one-dimensional bad guy who served HYDRA willingly but changed (because Sam gave such a good inspirational speech).
The end. Pay heed to this cautionary tale.
