So a long time ago (not actually so long ago) people would look at lichens and be like "huh yeah, those pretty much look the same. They must be the same." And then some nerds were like "actually if you look at the really really closely and look at the chemicals they produce and stuff, you will notice they are actually different, but probably closely related." And then more nerds invented genetic analysis and were like "um actually, a lot of these lichens that don't look the same are actually the same, and a lot of these lichens that do look the same are not actually that closely related at all." And then because some other nerds invented computers and the internet, all the lichen nerds can argue about it from around the world, and we (also nerds) are stuck trying to clean up the messes made with naming these species before we had this all great new technology. Exhausting, really. So here I have a lichen that on one site is called Caloplaca pellodella synonymized with Callopisma conglomeratum, and on another is Caloplaca conglomerata synonymized with Caloplaca peludella, and look, I just gotta assume they are all talking about the same dude and he has just been named and renamed and typoed a thousand times over in the many years since someone first decided to classify him. And if any of y'all recall my good pal Jan Vondrák, he is currently working on disentangling the messy Teloschistaceae family and will probably end up reassigning/renaming it soon anyway. The Sisyphean reality of learning lichens.