#burntchip

Like maybe I'm taking things the wrong way but to imply that Arthur did not plant the trees to offset co2 emissions from his travels and then weakly backtrack saying he doesn't really know is a bit scummy ngl

Like I get joking about Arthur being performative like he did in Chippo Iceland trip (and I even defended him from people complaining about his attitude in the video) but given that's it is something Arthur really cares about and talks about a lot maybe don't be so reckless with your statements? To the point where clearly as seen in the post people got the wrong impression (took his words literally) and he had to respond posting proof?

Sometimes I really feel he's trying to be a bit too much like Freezy and much like him takes it too far to the point of becoming rather annoying idk 🤷🏻‍♀️

What do you think?

Thanks for sharing your opinion. Your own opinion on this situation is valid and your entitled to that. You will find no judgement here.🙏💚

I will post the video for context:

Arthurs tweet:

I don't think it was malicious in any way.

I think when you have podcasts like this where you are sat talking shit for an hour with friends, you are bound to say something that sets people on edge. And he just didn't think about how his comment would be percieved.

I understand how what AB said might come across as though he was throwing Arthur under the bus.

He definitely does not think before he speaks. To add something to a conversation in a podcast, which ultimately made his friend look bad, is definitely a choice, not a very well thought out one obviously. Maybe he wanted to feel more involved or feel like he has something to prove. Who knows.

I can also see how some of what AB says can be construed as annoying. I feel like he's the type of personality you either love or hate.

I think it is possible he back tracked because he saw the reactions of George, Freezy and Chip and realized his mistake.