Why the heck are they wearing shibari suitsĀ ?
On āļøalienation and āļøāš„freedom in that soccer manga you know well
AbstractĀ : We will explore the themes of submission and domination within the character dynamics, then it we'll lead us to further themes as alienation and freedom.
I will mainly focus on Kaiser/Ness, Barou and Isagi.
1) SUBMISSION AND DOMINANCE š©
The shibari suits. Theyāre awesome.
One of the first things that comes in mind (well, mine at least) when you look at Bllk art direction, is the predominance of bondage themed symbols. The shibari suits, the art covers with collars and chains. But of course itās not gratuitous.
These things are indeed symbols that lead to fundamental themes in Blue Lock, such as submission and dominance within the character dynamics.
These themes are highlighted in the characters' dialoguesĀ : « Good boy/Yes, bossĀ Ā» (NagiReo), « Iām a king and youāre a peasantĀ Ā» (Barou, probably), the infamous « Auf Die Knie/On your kneesĀ Ā» (Kaiser)⦠Thereās honestly too much to write down all the occurrences. It's a pyrotechnic festival of degrading remarks. And of course we see that dynamic in the characters' actionsĀ : blows, jersey grabbing, hair pulling, kneeling down and so on.
Several character dynamics revolve around that dom/sub thingĀ ; and of course itās not a sexual thing in the narrow sense of the expression (See previous post about libido). Theyāre not really whipping themselves in a gay club backroom.
Itās a dom/sub dynamic in a broader sense that lies at the core of any imbalanced relationship (which is a must if youāre writing character dynamics).
Rivalry, this sport manga trope (and shounen trope in general), feasts on that imbalance. It would not be interesting if the protagonist won in their first try. A compelling story is always about conflict (great or small). It needs an established struggle that the protagonist has to overcome. In that dom/sub symbolism, it means that the protagonist must shift the balance of power to go on with their journey.
š¹The sad sl*t and his puppyĀ š©
At first glance, itās obvious that Kaiser is the dom of his relationship with Ness. He acts like a complete prick, uses him and hurt him both physically and emotionally, like the sadistic psycho he is.
When Isagi enters the stage, Kaiser asserts himself as a dominant character (« On you kneesĀ Ā» is literally one of his first sentences in the manga). Their relationship as rivals is a battle of egos (as always) to see whoās going to be on which side of the leash. At first, Kaiser is holding the leash of course or the stakes would be very low.
As Isagi gradually learns to resist him, Kaiserās dom persona is thrown off balance and he loses his sh*t. He overreacts in various ways, screams, makes super scary faces, takes out his frustration on poor Ness who is always here to clean the mess.
As his dom persona is in danger, the author offers Kaiserās backstory on a plate. Perfect timing. This backstory highlights unspeakable traumas and explains a lot about his projected identity (« Iām a domĀ Ā»). He alienates others, just as he himself has been alienated. He asserts himself as a dom because itās the only coping mechanism he found to escape the dehumanization he has endured.
And this raises this issue (which does not only concern Kaiser)Ā : who is the real sub, in the endĀ ?
The marvelous scene between Ness and Kaiser at the end of NEL arc (chap. 301) embodies the shift of power.
Long story shortĀ : Kaiser is the real sub.
Hegel (XIXe s.) addresses this very issue in whatās called the « master and slave dialectic » : at first glance, the master is superior to the slave of courseĀ ; but the slave works, and struggles, and pushes himself to try to escape the situation, while the master becomes more and more passive due to over-confidenceĀ ; finally, the slave has evolved while the master has just stagnatedĀ ; he realizes, too late, that his so-called power depends entirely on the slave, and that heās nothing without him.
And that expresses a seemingly contradictory truthĀ : only the ones that experience alienation can evolve, and ultimately, gain freedom.
2) āļøALIENATION AND FREEDOMāļøāš„Ā :
The term alienation is used to describe a negation of who you are. It can be at work, when your job doesnāt fit your inner values and make you feel miserable (see Marx on that topic), it can be in basically a lot of your social interactions if you are denied by discriminatory laws and behaviors (when youāre a victim of racism, sexism, LGBTphobia etc.).
Alienation means that youāre chained in a way or another, that youāre not allowed to be yourself. It goes to a deep level, where even you donāt allow yourself to be yourself (this is an important point).
This is the meaning of that chain-themed art directionĀ : characters in Bllk experience several kinds of alienation.
First of all, there are external constraints : Hiori and Reo, for example, are held back by their parentsā expectationsĀ ; Rin is held back by his brotherās inability to acknowledge him (or just to be nice with him, come on Sae thatās not that complicated you cold b*tch)Ā ; Chigiri and Yukimiya are held back by physical wound or illness.
Thatās why we see Chigiriās leg chained in some panels. When he finally manages to shake off the fear of hurting himself again, the symbolic bond breaks.
But as always, the real deal is not the external side of alienation (the seriousness of which I do not deny), itās the internal side of it, the internal constraintsĀ :
What pulled Chigiri back was not his wound after all, it was his fear to be hurt again, and even further, itās the fear to become someone heās not. Thatās the real alienation. And since the main concept of Bllk is identity, you see how fertile the alienation theme is to character development.
šTo elaborate on this topic, we will now focus on The KingĀ š¦
At first, Barou Shouei is not at all a victim of alienation⦠Heās the King, he asserts himself as such and fears no opposition. Heās depicted as a character with a strong affirmative force. He doesnāt bother to be nice to others and calls them « peasantsĀ Ā» or « losersĀ Ā» Ā ; he asserts his dominance on them, he holds the leash, because his identity is strong and stable.
When Isagi calls into question that untouched authority (Barouās King-ness), he introduces deny and contradiction into his world view. At first Barou is not willing to change and buries himself in denial. Isagi does tell that heās ruining his potential by refusing to acknowledge any challenge or frustration (chap.61).
In chapterĀ 62, Isagi finally manages to break Barouās self-confidence, and calls him a « loserĀ Ā», which is the ultimate negation of Barouās projected self (being a winner, a king). Barouās identity is now denied and stripped off himself, which leaves him devastated, shattered. He collapses and sees a future in which heās nothing but a depressed adult watching soccer on TV with a beer in hand.
The tables are turned. The alienation has crippled the lion king.
Now, we need to use that dialectic concept briefly introduced earlier. Itās the key to understand all that alienation/freedom stuffĀ :
Dialectic is a process that applies to everything, as long as it concerns human affairs (because you need self-awareness to experience it).
It begins with one element (1). That one element, being alone, is stable. But being stable, itās stagnant and boring. Itās the affirmation phase. Then comes the second element (2). Its mere existence challenges the first element by introducing Alterity. It doesnāt necessarily have to be an actual conflict, but it can be. The first element is set off balance. Itās the negation phase. Then, if the opportunity arises, the first element overcomes the contradiction, the phase of negation, by implementing new ways of existing, inspired by the struggle it has just undergone. So it becomes a new element (3). Itās the synthesis phase, called Aufhebung in german. Itās a self-transcendence thing, meaning that the Self acknowledges the Other and absorbs (« devoursĀ Ā») some elements of that Other in order to become a different and stronger Self (See Hegel, The Phenomenology of Spirit).
If this is too abstract, check this out Ā :
When Barou overcomes the negation phase, he becomes who he truly is (a king indeed), but not in the way he had initially imagined it. He shifts to a different king persona, a villain shadowy king who is better at soccer. Because this is a soccer manga, rememberĀ ?
(Side note: all this rant about "chemical reaction" is another metaphore that works for the dialectic process; you need at least two elements to make a chemical reaction, and create a new substance.)
š§©Isagiās rivalry dialectic⤓ļøĀ
Isagi experiences the cycle affirmation/negation/synthesis several times. Itās the core of his development as a character (and the core of every character to be honest).
First, he approaches the game with a plan in mind (1), then he is confronted to a rival who annihilates his path to the goal (2), and then, he overcomes the challenge and reinvent himself in order to become better (3). And he scores. GOOOOOAAAL
Do you remember that line from NietzscheĀ ? « What does not kill me makes me stronger.Ā Ā» (Twilight of the idols, 1889). This could be Isagiās motto.
It may appears as something boring in the long run, because Isagi seems to go in circles. But the important thing to understand is that synthesis is not only phase (1) + phase (2), a mere addition or juxtaposition of two elements. Itās a trans-formative process that adds layers of content. Thatās why dialectic does not go in circles as it may seems. Itās an upward spiralĀ :
And you certainly already understood that the dialectic progress has no end, because as a human being youāll always have to face new challenges just by existing and being around people.
Thatās why Isagi can never be the worldās best once and for all. Letās say he achieves his goal. Heāll have to find other challenges to devour. If he settles comfortably into the « worldās bestĀ Ā» persona and fears no contradiction, heāll become the master of the Hegelian master/slave dynamicĀ : heāll be confident, stagnant, boring (like these wealthy men in their fifties whom you have already come across), and heāll ultimately lose to someone hungrier than him.
And maybe, then, he will regain the hunger.
The bondage aesthetic symbolizes the submission/domination character dynamic, in which the roles are not that clearly defined, and in which the tables can be turned. A seemingly dominant character can be very fragile (because of over-confidence like Barou, or hidden traumas like Kaiser), and a seemingly submissive character can be the one in charge (like Ness who is indispensable to Kaiser, or Isagi because despite his apparent inferiority, he constantly manipulates stronger characters to get what he wants).
The bondage aesthetic also embodies the concept of alienation. Alienation is indeed a painful thing to experience, but itās also an essential catalyst for change and progress. Without contradiction, you stagnate into denial of alterity and turn in circles. No one can be self-sufficient, and a fictional character cannot either. To gain their freedom (and become who they truly are (if there is such a thing as a « true selfĀ Ā», but I keep this for another time)) the character has to be challenged and has to be able to overcome the challenge (itās not easy, and it is a subject well-suited to storytelling).
Because if you canāt enter phase 3 of the dialectic process (synthesis), well, youāre just stuck into that ping-pong motion between idle assertions and slaps in your face.
What does not kill you makes you stronger, or it can just break you. And thatās not cool š¢
The more I write about this, the more I could go on. Iāve just scratched the surface, but your time is precious. If you read this, Iām really honored. You can ask for details or challenge my point of view, Iāll be glad if you do it.
I state again that I do not pretend to speak the absolute truth. I just use the tools in my possession to give an interpretation. Interpretation always allows for more interpretations. It is neither a scientific demonstration nor a dogmatic religious assertion.
I think Iāll do a bonus post for Shidou and Sae on the sub/dom topic. Another for Nagi and ReoĀ ? Who knows.
And maybe one about Ego JinpachiĀ ? Heās an interesting character, master of puppets, but certainly alienated in some ways. Did you notice that Anri is the only character to this day who does not wear a collar on the art coverĀ ? Whereas Ego, who is the Blue Lockās mastermind, does wear one. Iām curious about that. Like heās chained by his own beliefs or something.
More philosophical rants:
Eros & Thanatos or On libido and death impulses on Bllk
Sae is the trigger Shidou is the bullet