Hope as a Discipline: from an interview with Mariame Kaba on the Beyond Prisons podcast
(transcript and audio here)
Kim: I think someone retweeted something you posted the other day and the last few days, it just really resonated with me and just has helped me tremendously. There are a lot of times where Iâm kind of lurking on Twitter, not necessarily engaging for a lot of reasons, but I saw this⌠it is something you wrote about hope being a discipline. I got to tell you, it made my day, if not my week, absolutely! Because itâs something that... it is easy to get down on everything thatâs going on.
Mariame: Sure.
Kim: Itâs really easy to kind of look around and be like, âOh my God, everything⌠set it all on fire and letâs just be done!â [laughs] Especially right now and I think that plugging in with folks and reading things and listening to things that are affirming and uplifting and do allow you to focus on the hopeful side of things are part of abolition. Iâd like you to say something about that, but I have another part to that question because they are both related or at least, in my thinking, which is about self-care for those of us doing this work. And thatâs something I spend a lot of time thinking about and talking about as well with the folks that Iâm connected with.
Mariame: I always tell people, for me, hope doesnât preclude feeling sadness or frustration or anger or any other emotion that makes total sense. Hope isnât an emotion, you know? Hope is not optimism.
I think that for me, understanding that is really helpful in my practice around organizing, which is that, I believe that thereâs always a potential for transformation and for change. And that is in any direction, good or bad. The idea of hope being a discipline is something I heard from a nun many years ago who was talking about it in conjunction with making sure we were of the world and in the world. Living in the afterlife already in the present was kind of a form of escape, but that actually it was really, really important for us to live in the world and be of the world. The hope that she was talking about was this grounded hope that was practiced every day, that people actually practiced it all the time.
And so, I bowed down to that. I heard that many years ago and then I felt the sense of, Oh my god. That speaks to me as a philosophy of living, that hope is a discipline and that we have to practice it every single day. Because in the world which we live in, itâs easy to feel a sense of hopelessness, that everything is all bad all the time, that there is nothing going to change ever, that people are evil and bad at the bottom. It feels sometimes that itâs being proven in various, different ways, so I get that, so I really get that. I understand why people feel that way. I just choose differently. I choose to think a different way and I choose to act in a different way. I choose to trust people until they prove themselves untrustworthy.
Jim Wallace, who people know as a liberal Evangelical, who thinks about faith a lot and talks about faith a lot and he always talks about the fact that hope is really believing in spite of the evidence and watching the evidence change. And that, to me, makes total sense. I believe ultimately that weâre going to win, because I believe there are more people who want justice, real justice, than there are those who are working against that.
And I donât also take a short-time view, I take a long view, understanding full well that Iâm just a tiny, little part of a story that already has a huge antecedent and has something that is going to come after that, that Iâm definitely not going to be even close to around for seeing the end of. So, that also puts me in the right frame of mind, that my little frigginâ thing Iâm doing, is actually pretty insignificant in world history, but [if] itâs significant to one or two people, I feel good about that.
If Iâm making my stand in the world and that benefits my particular community of people, the people I designate as my community, and I see them benefiting by my labor, I feel good about that. That actually is enough for me.
So, maybe I just have a different perspective and I talk to a lot of young organizers - people reach out to me a lot because Iâve been organizing for a long time - Iâm always telling them, âYour timeline is not the timeline on which movements occur. Your timeline is incidental. Your timeline is only for yourself to mark your growth and your living.â But thatâs a fraction of the living thatâs going to be done by the universe and that has already been done by the universe. So, when you understand that youâre really insignificant in the grand scheme of things, you just are, then itâs a freedom, in my opinion, to actually be able to do the work thatâs necessary as you see it and to contribute in the ways that you can see fit. So, I think thatâs my answer to that.
And self-care is really tricky for me, because I donât believe in the self in the way that people determine it here in this capitalist society that we live in. I donât believe in self-care, I believe in collective care, collectivizing our care, and thinking more about how we can help each other. How can we collectivize the care of children so that more people can feel like they can actually have their kids but also live in the world and contribute and participate in various different kinds of ways? How do we do that?
How do we collectivize care so that when weâre sick and weâre not feeling ourselves, weâve got a crew of people that are not just our prayer warriors, but our action warriors who are thinking through with us? Like, Iâm not just going to be able to cook this week, and you have a whole bunch of folks there, who are just putting a list together for you and bringing the food every day that week and youâre doing the same for your community, too.
I want that as the focus of how I do things and that really comes from the fact that I grew up the daughter of returned migrants, African-returned migrants. I donât see the world the way that people do here, I just donât. I donât agree with it, I think capitalism is actually continuously alienating us from each other, but also even from ourselves and I just donât subscribe. And for me, itâs too much with, âYeah Iâm going to go do yoga and then, Iâm going to go and do some sit-ups and maybe Iâll like, you know, go toâŚâ You donât have to go anywhere to care for yourself.
Brian: [chuckles] Right.
Mariame: You can just care for yourself and your community in tandem and that can actually be much more healthy for you, by the way. Because all this internalized, internal reflection is not good for people. You have to be able to have... Yes, think about yourself, reflect on your practice, okay, but then you need to test it in the world, youâve got to be with people. So, thatâs important. And I hate people! So, I say that as somebody who actually is really anti-social...
[Brian and Kim laugh]
Mariame: ⌠and I say, âI hate people.â I donât want to socialize in that kind of way but I do want to be social with other folks as it relates to collectivizing care.
Kim: Itâs something I say quite often, soâŚ
Brian: Yeah, I deeply identify with that.
Kim: âŚthe way you say it, like âOh my gosh, I hate people,â but yeah, I totally hear you, I mean I get it, I get it. Brian?
Brian: Yeah, I loved that so much. Thank you for that response right there.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
â Live Streamingâ Interactive Chatâ Private Showsâ HD Qualityâ Free Actions
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
But it should be remembered that the ancestors of many of today's most ardent liberals could not have imagined life without slavery, life without lynching, or life without segregation.
Podcasts have become an increasingly popular medium of communication, being used for entertainment, news and political commentary, and educational purposes.
Finding a good podcast to get into can be difficult as you search through the sea of podcasts that exist on multiple platforms today. Of course, recognizing the rising popularity of the podcast format means recognizing its rising power for political education and holding important conversations. Podcasts covering a range of topics such as race, gender, history, literature, and many other things exist out there, and it is important to uplift the ones that seek to educate and engage the listener beyond the common, mainstream political dialog.
Below I have listed my top 10 favorite podcasts (in no particular order) that you can listen to while driving in the car, cleaning your house, or in the background of your study session.
[ID - âAbolition requires that we change one thing, which is everything. When one says prison abolition, one cannot be talking about only prison... Itâs building the future from the present in all the ways we can.â Ruth Wilson Gilmore]
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
â Live Streamingâ Interactive Chatâ Private Showsâ HD Qualityâ Free Actions
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Realism in Abolition: from an Interview with Mariame Kaba on the Beyond Prisons podcast
 (transcript and audio at link)
Kim: Thank you. Iâd like to switch gears now and talk a little bit about something else that I know we always get asked as abolitionists. People always want to know, âWhat about people that have caused serious harm to others?â Iâd love to hear your thoughts about how you respond to this question.
Mariame: First, I understand, why people ask the question because society has done a really good job inculcating a bunch of fear in people. I donât know if people know whoâs actually in prison and whoâs not, so thereâs just a lot of misinformation. âLaw and Orderâ really has done a real job on people, a real kind of brainwashing job about who gets incarcerated, who those folks are, what that means. Thereâs also a huge conflation I think that people have around connecting crime and connecting incarceration, and so those things have connections to each other when even the most conservative criminologists and theorists and researchers have found that âcrimeâ and incarceration, the correlation between them is very faint and not as statistically significant as people think.
So, I understand that. I guess for me, if people think about sexual assault or murder, that usually happens between people who know each other really well. Itâs very rare that you have actual âserial rapistsâ in the world that are portrayed on TV. Thatâs not what most sexual assault actually is. Most sexual assault is actually not reported, most people who engage in it are not actually in prison. This idea that if you donât have prison thatâs going to flood the universe with all these sexual predators is completely not borne out by the actual empirical facts that we have going on right now. And itâs a great moment to think about that when more and more people are being either outed as sexual harassers and assaulters in the media through these revelations, ever since the Weinstein article in the [New York] Times. Can you imagine incarcerating all those men? Theyâre mostly men, as sexual predators. What would the system need to look like for that to be the solution to a problem that is actually about systemic, structural inequities in power?
I just think people have this idea that the 5% of the people who are actually in prison for murder and rape are everybody whoâs in prison. And so, the ending of prisons doesnât actually do the thing that youâre thinking  in your head would happen. In fact, the prison itself is such a perpetrator of sexual violence that if you are somebody who cares about ending sexual violence, you have to end the prison, too. These things are not separate from each other. If you are somebody whoâs concerned with murder, the prison is a murderer. You have to end that, too. Itâs its own form of violence.
Thatâs really a way of thinking about that. Prisons donât stop murder because we have murder, you know? So, you have to ask yourself the question about, âWhat are you trying to do?â and if itâs to increase actual safety, âWhat would lead to that? What would actually get us safe?â
We know that strong relationships with each other that are based on healthy accountability is the way to go, so, the question is how do we get to that? My interest has been in trying to figure that part of the equation out and I donât feel in any way defensive when people kind of point the finger at the abolitionist and say, [mock yelling] âWell what are we going to do about all theâŚ?â and itâs usually like that, itâs not ever like a calm-
Brian: [laughing] Right.
Mariame: âŚ[mock yelling] âBut what about all the rapists and murderers?â I always say to people, âAsk yourself whatâs happening to you right now. Why are you so agitated?â You know what I mean? âWhatâs going on?â Because the prison and the police are so in your head and your heart, youâre feeling personally affronted, because you think, these institutions matter to you quite a bit and the question is, âWhy do they matter so much to you? Are they doing what they say theyâre doing? Are they keeping the world safe?â Iâm just asking you to think about that, to answer that question yourself. If you feel like these institutions are working well and doing exactly what it is that youâd hope they do, then you shouldnât be mad at people who are trying to... then youâre fine, youâre just living in the world that exists. But if youâre somebody that thinks these things are actually damaging and you think them âworkingâ is actually working to further oppress and cause more violence, then youâre interested in something else and then, you and I can have this conversation about that. We can talk.
I also want to say that abolition is a collective project, it isnât an individual project. Even though we individually are doing abolitionist acts on a daily basis whether we know it or not, it is a collective project, which means that one person is not responsible for coming up with âthe solution.â
Kim: Absolutely.
Mariame: We have to come up with a solution based on our cultures and our communities and itâs again, based on our needs, our desires, our wants. So, me standing up there and making a big speech to you about abolition as a lofty⌠means zero. What does that mean in your life, in your world, in your context, in your community, with your people? How are you practicing abolition and how are you getting your ultimate goal if your ultimate goal is more safety?
So, when people say, âWhat about the rapists and the murderers?â I really want to say, âWell what about them?â because theyâre pretty much already not in prison.
Kim: Exactly.
Mariame: Weâre already living, if you want to call that abolition, weâre already living that kind of abolition, so thatâs why abolition for me is not mainly about the destruction or dismantling of the prison and the police and surveillance, though thatâs critically important, itâs creating the conditions necessary so that those things donât need to exist. Thatâs a very different project and thatâs a very different angle. Thatâs something that allows for a freedom to do a whole bunch of things that arenât even only and mainly about trying to end prisons or policing or surveillance. Thatâs about making sure people have living wages, thatâs about making sure people have actual housing, making sure people have good educations, making sure people have environmental health and not environmental racism, making sure we donât all die on the planet. All these things are abolitionist projects.
Thatâs the thing that most people that arenât abolitionists in terms of, people whoâve studied, who have practiced, whoâve organized under an abolitionist set of framework and ideology⌠I think most people think about it in an analytic exercise. But for me, itâs always been actual practice. Iâm an organizer and an educator first and thatâs where I learned about abolition, through practice. And yes, Iâve read a lot and Iâve read people that Iâve come to become friends with and respect, but thatâs not the gist of how I came to that. I came through action and looking for something that would change the circumstances that I was encountering that were super frustrating to me when I was working with survivors of violence.
So yeah, I think thatâs what I would say about, What about the sociopath? And the dangerous people and all this other kind of thing and, this is completely unrealistic. Oh really, is the current system realistic? Like really? I donât understand that. To me, of course itâs realistic, like itâs the most realistic thing there is. Your cynicism is unrealistic.