#bergon

Je reviens à mon projet de présenter la plupart de mes 55000 photos (nouveau compte approximatif. On se rapproche du présent !).

2016. Je passe quelques jours à Pau chez Christine “hors-saison” !

Changement d’ambiance, on va dans les Pyrénées béarnaises.

1 - l’Ossau

3 -  le Bergon, la Marère, le Permayou vus de la plaine de Bedous

4 - le Pic d'Amoulat

5 et 6 - la Pente du Permayou 

Bergon’s late mother had been perceived in Chalion as a virago, a Darthacan interloper suspected of fomenting her husband’s strife with his Heir on her son’s behalf. But Bergon seemed to remember her fondly; as a child he’d been through two sieges with her, cut off from his father’s forces in the intermittent war with his half brother. He was clearly accustomed to strong-minded women with a voice in men’s councils. When he and Cazaril had shared the oar bench he had spoken of his dead mother, although in disguised terms, when he’d been trying to encourage himself. Not of his live father. Bergon’s precocious wit and self-control as demonstrated in the dire days on the galley weren’t, Cazaril reflected, entirely the legacy of the Fox.

Cazaril’s smile broadened. “So let me tell you,” he began, “all about the Royesse Iselle dy Chalion…”

We seem to think that Time is the clock.  That "Time" belongs to numbers, wheel shaped clocks, and circular motions.

Aristotle, In the 4th Book of the physic, described time as having a circular and numerical character.  However, it wasn't anything like the type of objects we use to determine time.  He used shadows and dials.  

We strictly use the numerical characteristic of Time.  That is, Time is strictly a numerical conception now.  No longer is it circular anymore, except in some Buddhist sects.  Modernity uses digital and analog watches as representatives of time.  

However,

Let me remind you that "Time" existed before clocks, and watches, and seconds.  "Time" is a necessary mental construct (Thanks Kant).  A feature of language in order to identify the thing-like quality (The intangible character of time) of that invisible always eulisve concept.  Before it's formal, strictly numerical orientation, it was understood differently.  A kind of genealogy of Time has manifest at different epochs in understanding.  One that the philosophers below have analyzed with great irritation (in the biological sense).   

It also can be felt...  This is alluded to in the work of Bergon and Heidegger.  Being-in-the-world is an instance of experiencing Time as Temporality.

Imagine a car-accidents retrospection of Time.  We say, "Time seemed to have slowed down.  Everything seemed like it was moving in slow-motion".

Are we still, in-time in these instances?  Of course we are.  Time has not changed, for it is always changing (the next sections address this logic).  The change is our apperception of experienced "Time", not the change of Time itself.    

We have learned through Aristotelian Logic that if a-thing is always in a state change, it is ever-changing.  If it is ever-changing, it can never be accurately described because, descriptions only describe fixed states.  (An event that is framed in memory.  I.E. there is a beginning and end to that 'particular event').  Language as an intermediary for Understanding the World, provides a limited method for articulating experience.  As such, language prevents us from fusing-together, articulations of 'particular' previous event in a highly detailed linear model.  All this meaning, our tool for investigating Time, only lets us do so with highly marginal results.