Feb 10, 2025
bbc talking about Chinese film:
bbc: this is functionally a propaganda piece, and the basis of our propagandist red scare headline is a single imdb review!
?????
Loading...
seen from United States
seen from Lithuania
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from Philippines
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from Poland
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
bbc talking about Chinese film:
bbc: this is functionally a propaganda piece, and the basis of our propagandist red scare headline is a single imdb review!
?????
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch β’ No registration required β’ HD streaming
Laura Kuensburg apparently called whatβs happening in America a βscuffleβ.
I know this is a very minor criticism compared to the racism, transphobia, genocide apologism, legitimising of fascist violence etc but something else I've noticed about the BBC recently is they just do not bother putting any effort into any article relating to the railways
So many use outdated images, muddle simple details, and often outright just act as a platform for opponents to any rail project - see this one for example in which the 'analysis' from the BBC completely derails the focus of the article to talk about roads instead https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx2mnz9xejyo - as a transport advocate it pisses me off no end
Look ofc there are bigger and smaller issues but those are features of subpar journalism! the news that peddles itself as peak journalism and objective fact to keep people informed invested in its representation of issues should not be muddling details or using misleading images! I don't have the knowledge of rails or transportation infrastructure generally to add much to this but I welcome any details.
The aforementioned "analysis" on an article headlined "Railway sorely in need of investment, study finds" is below for the curious.
how on earth does this get published?
incredible and accurate reporting from bbc reporters who definitely know what autism is
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch β’ No registration required β’ HD streaming
Indigenous peoples have lived in and moved thru Yosemite since time immemorial but the bbc's chronic colonizer mindset is incurable
BBC news articles on Indigenous peoples never fail to disappoint
""ancient society"" so the Chumash. you tell us right there in the article it's the Chumash, the living people whose land that is.
while we're on the topic why tf do you think they're little-known π€ π€π€π€ nothing to do with how Native ppls in "California" have been treated??
what if we didn't make the first peoples of Turtle Island "settlers" and make a false equivalence white settlement and theft
what if you didn't instroduce the article, the Chumash, and their lands via a completely made up and racist childrens book????
the article ends with this summary quote, any element of which could have been incorporated into the headline, subheader, or open paragraph, which people actually look at: "
"These are Chumash lands and it feels important that we educate the public about that. The Chumash live today, they are part of society and are still alive and well today. They are not the past, they are here now, a culture that's thriving, and they are sharing the cultural traditions with the younger generations."