Man I just don't get allorose people sometimes.
Because I'm looking at the reviews of a M/M romance book I read recently and a concerningly high amount of people are taking umbrage with one of the protagonists having sexual relationships before getting with the other protagonist. Because apparently this means that he doesn't truly romantically love the other character and him alone. I thought it was pretty clear that no, he doesn't have romantic feelings for any of the other people he sleeps with, and his most prominent FWB relationship is pretty firmly rooted in platonic and sexual attraction with no expectations of ever becoming romantic—in large part because the FWB is aroallo.
Like I'd get it if he was doing all this whilst dating the other character, without his express consent to an open relationship, but no, at this point in the book he's single and free to hook up with whoever the fuck he likes. I've even seen a couple reviews outright call it cheating! Like what the fuck?????
It feels like so much of this is rooted in amatonormative ideas about how there should only ever be One Person you are romantically and sexually intimate with at a time, that sex without romantic love is inherently impure, shallow, etc. And it's infuriating! Because the FWB pretty much turns to the camera and says "I'm aroallo" and the book does a pretty good job at positively portraying a friendship that also involves mutual sexual attraction, but some people seem to be fit and determined to insist that sex without romance, especially with multiple partners, is A Bad Thing Actually.








