Battleaxe bisexuals rise up

seen from United States
seen from China
seen from United States

seen from Sri Lanka

seen from Egypt
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from China

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from Costa Rica

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Chile
seen from United States

seen from Norway

seen from United States
Battleaxe bisexuals rise up

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Another post about pansexuals, Iâm so original I know. People who identify as m-spec labels do not belong in bisexual spaces. âYou canât say their bisexual and then exclude them from bi spaces and discussions,â yes we absolutely can.
Yes they are bisexual, but they are actively choosing not to identify as such. You canât make your entire identity around not being bi and then expect toďżź be able to take refuge in our spaces and speak over us. You choose not to identify as bisexual why would you want to be in our spaces and conversations?
"Hearts not parts" was originally a bisexual slogan. It was used to combat the stigma around bisexualityâthat we were dirty, cheaters, genital-obsessed, overly sexual, perverted freaks. Pansexuals took it and have used it as a terrible way to attempt to differentiate themselves from us which only continues this stigma. They imply that they care about hearts while we care about parts.
Remember why this was started and now look at what it's being used for. I am not okay with this. We are taking it back.
Update 2/27/21 I think I made this post last year so not everything will be current. Iâll make a new post about my updated general lgbt opinions later
Hereâs some updated opinions~
â˘Pan and Bi people can have the same experiences, but Pan much more closely defines certain experiences and usually a different form of attraction entirely.
â˘Pan, Poly, and Omni are all valid. They can function as synonymous to Bi but they are still valid.
â˘All people attracted to multiple genders should be considered in roughly the same community, just that these certain identities experience nuanaced differences. (I prefer using Bi+ as to me it sounds more âprofessionalâ but that might be from studying business etiquette đ).
â˘Anti-Pan people have inherently harmful beliefs. Being critical of Bi+ communities however, isnât -phobic.
â˘Anti-Pan people are really only anti-Pan to due different and often inaccurate views on how attraction and nuances work or that things can overlap and some people feel that they are a certain label due to its specific nuances.
â˘You can be critical of your own community and the others in Bi+ and still support all Bi+ identities. Objectivivity doesnât equal hate.
yeah can we stop with the whole âpedophiles are trying to enter the community so you shouldnât care about biphobia and the only reason I donât want you to talk about the biphobia is because I contribute to it and donât want to accept it so instead of trying to understand Iâm going to borderline gaslight by saying your problems and opinions donât matter because there a âbigger issuesââ thing.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Hey! Would other Pan people please reblog with this with their definition of Pan and how it compares to Bi? Thereâs a post a want to make but I want this info first! Any kind of âwell Iâm attracted to soulsâ or anything else that tries to paint Pan as morally good or inclusive will be not considered.
Please donât use the âit includes trans peopleâ or âBi is exclusively two gender attractionâ!
My definition: Attraction regardless of gender; attraction where gender isnât a factor.