Explaining ideogenders
Ideo- in ideobinary represents “those who relate to having an experience that does rely on [X] or [X]-related concepts, while not relating to an experience that is similar to that of a [X] gender”. Gender qualifiers, usually ending in -ine, mean “having qualities or an appearance associated with [X]”.
Ideogender identifiers therefore reference or allude viagenders, without necessarily being viaspec. The first and most known modifiers are FMN (fingender, mingender, ningender), coined by @pastelroswell (FM orientations coined by @pleurocarpous/deactivated). (Mid)bingender encompass (mid)binary natures.
Ideo- and via- mainly focus on the difference between masculine/feminine vs male/female genders. But there’s niaspec/niagender, what could distinguish it from ninspec? Would it be like epin/epia (epicene)? Viagenders aren’t essentially tied to midbinary archetypes. Fiaspec/miaspec were coined before maingender and feingender, are they the same? Fia/mia at least use inclusion of wif-/wer-genders.
Neutrois isn’t always a neutral gender, not all neutraline genders are neutrois, and not all xenines are xenoic. Neutrine/neutrinity (neutralinity/neutrous) and androgynine/gynandrine/angine/anginity (gynandrinity/androgininity/androgynity) can be gender qualities, going with outherine, aporine/aporous, agenine and xenine/xenous.
Sometimes, they interchangeably overlap each other. So this post is up for discussions.
