#midbin

Flag redesigns: Juxeraflux and Proxvirflux

Juxeraflux and proxvirflux are genderflux versions of the circabinary genders juxera and proxvir.

I wanted to redo my original flags for these terms! The originals are too saturated to me, and I ended up not liking the pure white outer stripes.

I used slightly shifted juxera and proxvir colors, and I went with the same general format as the other genderflux flags. My main concern was making them distinct enough from the girlflux and boyflux flags, which I think I've accomplished!

Abinaryn't (nonabinary/non-abinary/nonabin or nonab/non-ab/naby): not abinary; an umbrella term for anyone who is not abinary.

mcin/muin/moin/mein: masculine in nature

fiin/fain/fuin/foin: feminine in nature

Misobinary/midsobinary/misdobinary (midbinary isogender, midisogender, isomidbinary, isomid/midiso, midisobinary, isomidbinary) or midabsgender (midabs): midbinary individuals whose gender modality is both cisn’t and transn’t; nonbinary people whose experience are in between, beyond or removed from cis/trans dichotomies while their genderness is referencing, in some way, the gender binary.

Xaexell, xaerell, faexell, xensari, cenxari or xenxari: a term for those who are xiaspec, niaspec and liaspec. They can experience the xia/nia/liaspec-ness in any configuration, including but not limited to: being all three at once, being static in one or two but the others are fluid or flux, or being fluid between all alignments.

It’s the combination of censari, xenrell and faexari. The coiner of the xenoic version of faesari and cenrell used viaspec (viagender spectral) terms instead of ideospec (ideogender spectrum), her explanations used finspec/minspec terms instead of fiaspec/miaspec, other times using them interchangeably. So xenxari can be linspec/xinspec too. 

Ideo- in ideobinary represents “those who relate to having an experience that does rely on [X] or [X]-related concepts, while not relating to an experience that is similar to that of a [X] gender”. Gender qualifiers, usually ending in -ine, mean “having qualities or an appearance associated with [X]”.

Ideogender identifiers therefore reference or allude viagenders, without necessarily being viaspec. The first and most known modifiers are FMN (fingender, mingender, ningender), coined by @pastelroswell (FM orientations coined by @pleurocarpous/deactivated). (Mid)bingender encompass (mid)binary natures.

Ideo- and via- mainly focus on the difference between masculine/feminine vs male/female genders. But there’s niaspec/niagender, what could distinguish it from ninspec? Would it be like epin/epia (epicene)? Viagenders aren’t essentially tied to midbinary archetypes. Fiaspec/miaspec were coined before maingender and feingender, are they the same? Fia/mia at least use inclusion of wif-/wer-genders.

Neutrois isn’t always a neutral gender, not all neutraline genders are neutrois, and not all xenines are xenoic. Neutrine/neutrinity (neutralinity/neutrous) and androgynine/gynandrine/angine/anginity (gynandrinity/androgininity/androgynity) can be gender qualities, going with outherine, aporine/aporous, agenine and xenine/xenous.