The Bachelor. Nightingale edition
While trying to navigate through not_so_transparent RoLâs lore, character development and pretty fucked up emotional baggage of Thomas and Peter (god help them), the lovely @punnyadt-goreny and I at some point came to a conclusion that âStarlingaleâ, as a popular pairing as it is, has a lot of flaws. One can forget about the age gap and the chain of command, one can get used to social, cultural and economical differences. But one canât fix psychology. Overall, for âStarlingaleâ to work (realistically)⊠they need to work⊠HARD. And none of them (realistically) seem to be capable of doing such work.
And that got me thinking. There are at least two other suitable candidates for the role of a perfect guardian of Nightingaleâs battered heart. Less tricky and more reliable. So, ladies, gents and non-binary folks, letâs take a closer look at Alexander Seawoll and Abdul Walid.
Quick note: Yes, I'm considering only same-sex relationships. Partly because of the personal preferences and partly because I for the life of me cannot see a more or less suitable straight pairing for Nightingale in canon (unless Dr Vaughan is secretly waiting to seize the opportunity, that is). Yes, I know that Abdul is canonically married, but since no one ever saw Mrs Columbo Walid⊠And, yes, when it comes to Nightingaleâs heart we could always just resurrect David Mellenby and be happy with that. BUT⊠in order to do that, Iâm afraid weâre gonna need a healer. And when I say a healer I mean The Doctor. Vwoorp-vwoorp!
âThis is my fucking investigation, Nightingale,â said Seawoll. âI donât care who youâre currently fucking â I donât want any of your X-Files shit getting in the way of proper police work.â (Book 1, chapter 2)
Yeah⊠If it isnât the vibe of a bad break up⊠I honestly donât know what it is then. But of course BA never intended it like that. He obviously wants to be good and progressive, but apparently not that good and progressive (cough I do want to have some words with BA cough). AnywayâŠ
The obvious sparks aside, this pairing seems oddly believable and strangely workable.
They both know what the job is and how it always comes first. Theyâre equal in ranks. And the " weird bollocksâ aspect doesnât seem like a big problem. Alex can get used to it, certainly.
Alexâs apparent⊠simplicity (letâs call it that) in manners is easily overshadowed by his loyalty and pragmatism. He is as reliable as a staff made by Sons of Weyland and really clever. He would definitely rip Nightingaleâs shooter to shreds with his bare hands (who needs impello, right?), then would get suspended and move to the Folly to take an eye on the inpatient patient, to Mollyâs delight and Peterâs confusion.
His relationship with his emotions, however, leaves a lot to be desired. Like Peterâs shrink pointed out in AoW: Alexâs barking is his way of showing affection. Because showing affection in a proper healthy way involves showing too much vulnerability, apparently (from the creators of âboys donât cryâ bollocks). Him and Thomas are pretty similar in this regard and that makes them⊠a bit dry (although totally English). And here lies one small technical problem. You can soften them up only to a point. If you want to make them properly cute⊠you have to sacrifice Nightingale. And by sacrifice I mean making him the weaker one. You canât fiddle with Seawoll. He is a rock. And if he gets a bit less rocky, he stops being Seawoll. So any potential softness gets to come at Nightingale expense. And itâs a tough decision.
Overall, with no-OOC, this relationship is something that could fit in the canon easily, mostly because of its emotional dryness and no-nonsense vibe. I couldâve mentioned dramatical blandness, but⊠There are still a lot of potential conflicts and job-related situations one could come up with to shake things up a little. So, it might not be so bland after all. And the initial âgetting togetherâ story could be quite fascinating as well.
WellâŠÂ Those of you who havenât read âA Gentlemanâs Agreementâ series, I do recommend you take a look. Itâs a gem. And most of my theorising is based on the experience of reading it.Â
I have to admit, Abdul is very close to being the perfect partner. But as it usually is, itâs his blessing and his curse.Â
Letâs start with blessings. He is a self sufficient, sophisticated man, a professional with a brilliant career, a man of science, no less, which makes him a faint reminder of a poor old David. And maybe itâs a different sort of science but the same sort of curiosity, that familiar to Thomas (and that Thomas secretly is quite fond of, otherwise, why would he willingly obey Abdulâs âdoctor ordersâ and let himself be poked, prodded and put in an MRI in the name of science). But this curiosity doesnât blind Abdul (which, Iâm afraid, we canât say about David). He appreciates Thomas as a person, and not solely as a project, a specimen to be studied. The man fascinates Abdul (so does magic), but his fascination is more on a tender side. Itâs a good starting point, but then they get to talk. And with Abdul they would talk, becauseâŠ
Abdul is mentally stable and emotionally available. Of course, heâs not explicitly touchy-feely, but being a doctor he knows a thing or two about psychology and what is healthy or not. He wouldnât want to change Thomas, thou, more likely he would guide him subtly to a more open way of expressing emotions, the way Thomas still would be comfortable with (which is important). Abdul doesnât care about vulnerability, it doesnât affect his judgement of character, I mean, heâs seen Thomas gravely wounded and drugged to the oblivion, how much more vulnerable one could get. So, basically, when Alex is a man who can physically catch Thomas if he falls, Abdul is the one who can catch him mentally. And, imo, psychological comfort is what the current version of Nightingale desperately needs.Â
You can easily make them cute and domestic without sacrificing Nightingaleâs slightly dry demeanour. Abdul would adapt to his partnerâs quirks, being absolutely comfortable with the way Thomas is. However if youâre partial to a more soft Nightingale, that will work as well. Iâd say, with more tenderness they would just flourish. But here comes the curse.
Perfect partners tend to be boring⊠dramatically speaking. The easiest solution is to overflow them with love and cuteness. But love and cuteness get old pretty fast. One should be really careful with the amount of sugar, especially in M/M relationships, especially if one of these M is Thomas bloody Nightingale. Another obvious way is to make Abdul a âdamsel in distressâ, but this trope doesnât really work with him. Heâs not so much a part of the job so he can be in immediate danger quite frequently. And his relationship with Thomas might as well be pretty closed so no one would really know about them. So this practically leaves us with a quite limited variety of inner conflicts, such as, for instance, Abdulâs religious beliefs and Abdul getting older while Thomas is not. The former, however itâs an interesting subject of study, is also a big bloody minefield. And as an atheist I wouldnât go this path, Iâd prefer to assume that Abdul was a grown man and knew what heâs doing in regard to the potential controversy. The latter, on the other hand, might spice up their pairing a bit. But at the end of the day itâs kinda sad, slightly morbid and⊠predictable. Everyone already knows how itâll end. Even if Thomas starts ageing again, the chances are he still will outlive Abdul. And Abdul being near perfect just makes this inevitability even more tragic. Itâs pretty much David 2.0. Itâs gonna fucked up Thomas again. Unless he decides to⊠well⊠you know⊠to take the matter in his own hands.Â
And thatâs what brings us back to the start and (god help me) a potential drama queenâŠ
I used the âdrama queenâ term here a bit too freely. What I actually mean is that Peter is the queen for those who love drama. I mean, oh, boy, where do I start?!Â
Heâs a subordinate and an apprentice, which is already a problem and quite serious one, at least for Thomas. Heâs emotionally fucked up, had a controversial childhood and his relationship with his dad⊠for a long time has been non-existened. He craves validation and love at the same time being justifiably anxious about potential âfather figuresâ. And yes, I agree, heâs showing symptoms of avoidant attachment style. That being said I should mention that after a thorough consideration I came to a conclusion that Thomas is more likely anxious-avoidant than just anxious. And those who know about attachment styles already guessed that itâs even more⊠fucked up.Â
Peter also has a tendency of being bravely stupid or stupidly brave (whatever you prefer) and this accompanied with the scientific curiosity that makes him a reminder of David as well, can drive poor Thomas to an untimely death from a heart attack. The ageing predicament be damned.Â
In no way Peter is a perfect or even comfortable partner for Thomas. And their initial getting together that usually gets simplified in fanfics (for totally understandable reasons) realistically shouldn't be simple. Theyâve got issues. Both of them. A lot of ussies. And this obviously makes them interesting⊠dramatically speaking. However, if they wonât get their heads out of their arses and surender to the therapy, theyâre doomed. And given how much is at stake here⊠with Peter being the only apprentice and with the whole future of the Folly on his shoulders, and if the relationship went awry, he would probably transfer and it would be a square one again for Thomas⊠Yeah, well, you get the idea.Â
Why wouldnât it work the same way it apparently would with Alex? Firstly, because of inequality. And not even in ranks but in age as well. Thomasâs âborrowed timeâ aside, Alex and him are still more equal in this regard. Alex is a grown ass man, who knows what he wants and what heâs doing, heâs got a lot more experience with life (love-life included) and people. He may not be the most patient of men, but he knows how to care for others. As opposed to Peter whoâs got little to none of such experience. Heâs too young. I might even go further and say he is too young to appreciate Thomas beyond his crush on âtiger tank destroyerâ. Simply because (truth be told) he doesnât really know the man. They donât talk to each other. Itâs not solely Peterâs fault. Them talking to each other would have to include Thomas getting a bit vulnerable in front of Peter. Which is not an easy task for Thomas. And, more importantly, might affect Peterâs judgement of him, because of the clearly existing âpedestalâ. Neither Alex nor Abdul put Thomas on a pedestal. But Peter does. And itâs a shaky foundation for a relationship that is destined to fall sooner rather than later.Â
So in order for them to work they need to transform. The transformation in itself is a very interesting story, add to that the job-related dangers and ooh! So as much as Stralingale is a flawed pairing, itâs pretty damn interesting as well⊠if you want them to suffer a bit first.Â
What does it tell us? In the paradigm of âwrite what you wantâ nothing much really. I wonât be nagging about âthe right waysâ of utilizing characters. But still there are some hints on what type of story would be better suited for each pairing.Â
So, if youâre up to some gruesome character development that eventually will help them to be a bit less fucked up, Peter is your boy. Heâll drive Thomas insane but through this insanity he will (probably) find clarity.Â
If you want just a happy Thomas whoâs loved just because he exists, you may consider putting him in Abdulâs careful hands.Â
And if you donât really care about cuteness and just want to add a workable relationship with a reliable partner that wonât look out of place in a canonical setting â try Seawoll, youâll be surprised (and so will Peter).Â